2021_02.11 CIAC Packet
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2021 5:30 PM
VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY JOIN BY VISITING
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/7732695410 AND/OR BY DIALING 877 853 5257 AND
USING MEETING ID Meeting ID: 773 269 5410
I. CALL TO ORDER
NOTE: Pursuant to Texas Government Code §551.071, the Planning & Zoning Commission
reserves the right to adjourn into Executive Session at any time during the Work Session or the
Regular Session to discuss posted Executive Session items or to seek legal advice from the City
Attorney on any item posted on the agenda.
II. REGULAR SESSION
III. ROLL CALL
IV. VISITOR AND CITIZEN FORUM
At this time, any person may address the board or governing body, provided that an official ‘Speaker’s
Request Form’ has been submitted to the secretary prior to the start of the meeting. All comments must
be directed towards the body as a whole, rather than individual members or staff. All speaker s must limit
their comments to the subject matter as listed on the ‘Speaker’s Request Form.’ No formal action can be
taken nor discussion held regarding these items.
V. REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
VI. MINUTES APPROVAL
A. Consider approval of minutes for the November 12, 2020 regular meeting
VII. DECISION ITEMS
A. Consider approval of Capital Improvements Program and maximum impact fee
calculation
VIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Planning & Zoning Commission reserves the right to convene in Executive Session(s) during this
meeting pursuant to §551.071(2) when the Planning & Zoning Commission seeks the advice of its
attorney concerning any item on this agenda or a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the Planning
& Zoning Commission under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of
Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code.
IX. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION, AND TAKE ACTION NECESSARY PURSUANT TO
EXECUTIVE SESSION, IF NEEDED
X. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Kennedale will provide for reasonable
accommodations for persons attending public meetings. This facility is wheelchair accessible and accessible
parking spaces are available. Requests for sign interpreter services must be made forty-eight (48) hours prior
to the meeting. Please contact the City Secretary at 817-985-2104 or (TTY) 1-800-735-2989.
CERTIFICATION
_________________________
MELISSA DAILEY, AICP
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
POSTED ___________ (DATE) ___________ (TIME)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2020 5:30 PM
VIA VIDEOCONFERENCE
ZOOM INFO: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/7732695410 DIALING 877 853 5257 AND
USING MEETING ID Meeting ID: 773 269 5410
I. CALL TO ORDER
NOTE: Pursuant to Texas Government Code §551.071, the Planning & Zoning Commission
reserves the right to adjourn into Executive Session at any time during the Work Session or the
Regular Session to discuss posted Executive Session items or to seek legal advice from the City
Attorney on any item posted on the agenda.
II. REGULAR SESSION
III. ROLL CALL
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
PLACE MEMBER PRESENT ABSENT VOTING
1 GREG ADAMS X
X
2 MARTHA DIBELLA X X
3 AUSTIN DEGENHART X
X
4 KAYLA HUGHES X X
5 VACANT
6 BILLY DON GILLEY
7 MARK PERKINS X
X
8 BRENT JONES (Alt)
9 PERRY CLEMENTI (Alt)
IV. VISITOR AND CITIZEN FORUM
At this time, any person may address the board or governing body, provided that an official ‘Speaker’s
Request Form’ has been submitted to the secretary prior to the start of the meeting. All comments must
be directed towards the body as a whole, ra ther than individual members or staff. All speakers must limit
their comments to the subject matter as listed on the ‘Speaker’s Request Form.’ No formal action can be
taken nor discussion held regarding these items.
V. REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
VI. MINUT ES APPROVAL
VII. DECISION ITEMS
A. Receive a report and consider approval of land use assumptions for water, wastewater and
roadway impact fees
Staff Presentation
A team from Freese & Nichols consisting of Eddie Haas, Andrew Franco, and Nicholas Mccormick
are present for to give a presentation about impact fees and land use assumptions.
Mr. Franco explained that Kennedale has an impact fee program (water, sewer and roadway fees)
which was last updated in 2016. State of Texas Local Government Code ma ndates that if a city
has an impact fee program, they must update every five years. Impact fee studies determine what
the maximum allowable fee per law is; city council determines the actual feel; CIAC makes a
recommendation of fees to City Council. An impact fee is a one-time charge assessed to new
development. Impact fees are a mechanism of funding for the infrastructure needed to
accommodate new development. Impact fees allow the city to cover costs associated with
infrastructure (Chapter 395 of Texas Local Government Code). An impact fee can pay for
construction costs, survey costs, engineering costs, la nd costs and any debt services. Impact fees
cannot pay for upgrading, updating, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements; repair,
operation or maintenance of new facilities Mr. Franco explained that CIAC is to provide input on
the Land Use Assumptions and Growth Rate; Capital Improvements Plans for Water, Wastewater
and Roadway; fee recommendation to City Council.
Kayla Hughes asked if new fees are passed, does that impact development currently on -going?
Melissa Dailey explained that on-going development was processed with current fees.
Mr. Franco explained the Land Use Assumptions and historical growth data for Kennedale, with
data from the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTOG) and the Census Bureau.
NCTOG shows a 1.5% growth rate per year and census shows a 3% growth rate per year over a
decade study. Franco highlighted current development in the city and discussion with the city staff
to recommend a 3.50% growth rate in terms of projected population, over the next 5, 10 years,
etc.
Mr. Franco then explained the water and roadway service area(s), showing visually wher e the
coverage is within the city. Mr. Franco showed water demand projections for the city as well as
road demands. Freese & Nichols is projecting a 140 MGD water use average per day. Mr. Haas
explained that the impact fee recommendation for roadway is based on 10-year growth.
Mr. Franco showed the calculation for roadway fees, showing that calculation consists of the
number of development units, vehicle-miles per development unit which gives you the
development vehicle miles. Then, calculation consists of developme nt vehicle-miles, cost per
vehicle mile which gives you the impact fee due from developer. Maximum allowable impact fee is
calculated with the impact fee eligible cost – credit or 50% divided by the growth in equivalent
meters. Mr. Franco showed impact fees of other metro towns and where Kennedale compares in
terms of single family residence applicable fees.
Board Discussion
Kayla Hughes asked if developers could be deterred by an increase of fees. Melissa Dailey
explained that developers are typically used to impact fees being charged in most cities, and
Kennedale’s are in line with or below many other cities.
Martha Dibella asked if projections are based on the co mprehensive plan of Kennedale. Mr. Haas
explained that projections are based on growth currently happening. Ms. Dibella asked about
neighboring cities on the chart that don’t have fees – specifically Grand Prairie and Euless not
having roadway fees. Mr. Haas explained that other cities could have other mechanisms to cover
capital improvements.
Kayla Hughes asked Melissa Dailey her thoughts about future growth in regards to these fees.
Melissa Dailey explained that development is continuing , but still substantial vacant and
underdeveloped land remains in the city.
Austin Degenhart asked and Mr. Haas explained that there is capacity to cover growth.
Martha Dibella asked about the difference between census growth data and COG data. Mr. Haas
explained that Kennedale growth could be occurring quicker than COG estimated, and census is
more of an actual number.
Board Decision
Mark Perkins made a motion to adopt the 3.5% rate. Austin Degenhart seconded that motion.
Motion passed with a 6-0 vote.
VIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The Planning & Zoning Commission reserves the right to convene in Executive Session(s) during this
meeting pursuant to §551.071(2) when the Planning & Zoning Commission seeks the advice of its
attorney concerning any item on this agenda or a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the Planning
& Zoning Commission under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Co nduct of the State Bar of
Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code.
IX. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION, AND TAKE ACTION NECESSARY PURSUANT TO
EXECUTIVE SESSION, IF NEEDED
X. ADJOURNMENT
Water, Wastewater, & Roadway
Impact Fee Update
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC)
Presentation #2
February 11, 2021
Discuss CIAC Recommendation to Council
Overview of Study Tasks
Service Areas
Land Use Assumptions
Service Units
Existing Capacity, Usage & Deficiencies
Projected Demand
Capital Improvement Plans
Service Unit Equivalency
Cost per Service Unit Calculation
Ch 395, TLGC
Technical
Requirements
Addressed in
Study Report
2
Impact Fee Process
3
•Identify Service AreasStep 1
•Update Land Use AssumptionsStep 2
•CIAC Presentation #1
•Update Capital Improvements PlanStep 4
•Public Hearing & Council ApprovalStep 7
•Update Impact Fee OrdinanceStep 8
•Impact Fee Calculations & Report PreparationStep 5
•CIAC Presentation #2Step 6
Step 3
Role as CIAC Member
Targeted Meetings:
•No. 1 –Basics, Land Use Assumptions, and
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
•No. 2 –Cost per service unit, benchmarking,
policy discussion
Letter to City Council:
•Recommended collection rates
Impact Fee Calculation
Impact Fee
per Service Unit =
Impact Fee CIP Cost
New Service Units
•IF CIP Cost credited 50%for the portion of ad-
valorem taxes / water and wastewater rates
generated by projects
•Fee collected can be less than maximum by
policy; by service area
Water and Wastewater
Impact Fee Summary
6
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee
Calculation –Water/Wastewater
7
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
50%
Credit
Growth In
Service Units
Maximum Allowable
Impact Fee
-
=
Impact Fee Eligible Costs –
Water/Wastewater
8
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
50%
Credit
Growth In
Service Units
Maximum Allowable
Impact Fee
-
=
9
Water CIP
•Updated construction
costs to 2020 dollars.
•Added Phase II 12-inch
Water Line at Interstate
20 and Highway 287
•Removed Proposed
Ground Storage Tank at
Trinity Well #3
Proj.
No.Description of Project
Percent Utilization
Capital Cost
Costs Based on 2020 Dollars
2020*2030
10-Year
2020-2030
Current
Development
10-Year
2020-2030 Beyond 2030
EXISTING
A 16-inch Water Line from Gail Drive to North Little School Road 60%80%20%$753,255 $451,953 $150,651 $150,651
B 12-inch Bowman Springs Road Water Line 15%50%35%$303,243 $45,486 $106,135 $151,622
C 12-inch Swiney Hiett Road Water Line 30%60%30%$18,477 $5,543 $5,543 $7,391
D 2014 Water/Wastewater Master Plan (Water Portion)60%100%40%$49,874 $29,924 $19,950 $0
E 2020 Impact Fee Study (Water Portion)0%100%100%$33,333 $0 $33,333 $0
EXISTING TOTAL $1,158,182 $532,906 $315,612 $309,664
PROPOSED
1 12-inch Water Line South of Interstate 20 Phase I 0%45%45%$733,700 $0 $330,165 $403,535
2 12-inch Water Line Replacement South of Interstate 20 Phase
II 20%45%25%$963,900 $192,780 $240,975 $530,145
3 16-inch South Eden Road Water Line 0%45%45%$515,900 $0 $232,155 $283,745
4 12-inch Dick Price Road and Linda Road Water Line 0%30%30%$1,177,500 $0 $353,250 $824,250
5 12-inch Dick Price Road Water Line Replacement North of
Shady Lane 35%75%40%$390,100 $136,535 $156,040 $97,525
6 12-inch Water Line from Dick Price Road to South New Hope
Road 0%30%30%$1,158,400 $0 $347,520 $810,880
7 12-inch Hudson Creek and Highway 287 Water Line 0%50%50%$1,818,400 $0 $909,200 $909,200
8 12-inch Water Line Replacement from Wildcat Way to Swiney
Hiett Road 45%80%35%$2,002,200 $900,990 $700,770 $400,440
9 12-inch South New Hope Road Water Line Replacement 25%55%30%$442,200 $110,550 $132,660 $198,990
10 Offsite Water Line Improvements -Arlington Supply at Eden
Road 0%15%15%$1,031,300 $0 $154,695 $876,605
PROPOSED TOTAL $10,233,600 $1,340,855 $3,557,430 $5,335,315
Total Water Capital Improvements Cost $11,391,782 $1,873,761 $3,873,042 $5,644,979
*Utilization in 2020 on proposed projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system and therefore not
eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth.
Water CIP Summary
10
Impact Fee Eligible Costs –
Water
11
Water Category Water Total Cost
Water Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
Existing Eligible Projects $1,158,182 $315,612
Future Eligible Projects $10,233,600 $3,557,430
Sub-Total $11,391,782 $3,873,042
Cumulative Interest*$1,085,583
Water Impact Fee Eligible Cost $4,958,625
*Finance costs are based on the interest paid over a 20-year bond at a 3.0% interest rate –For Future Eligible Projects
only.
Wastewater CIP
12
•Updated construction
costs to 2020 dollars.
•Added 12-inch Interceptor
Replacement along South
New Hope Road
•Revised the sizing of the
Interceptor to the
Interstate 20 Arlington
Delivery Point to be 24-
inches
Proj.
No.Description of Project
Percent Utilization
Capital Cost
Costs Based on 2020 Dollars
2020*2030
10-Year
2020-2030
Current
Development
10-Year
2020-2030 Beyond 2030
EXISTING
A 2014 Water/Wastewater Master Plan (Wastewater
Portion)60%100%40%$49,874 $29,924 $19,950 $0
B 2020 Impact Fee Study (Wastewater Portion)0%100%100%$33,333 $0 $33,333 $0
EXISTING TOTAL $83,207 $29,924 $53,283 $0
PROPOSED
1 15-inch Wastewater Interceptor Replacement along
North Road and Valley Lane 25%70%45%$1,896,100 $474,025 $853,245 $568,830
2 18-inch Wastewater Interceptor Replacement in Basin B 30%75%45%$978,500 $293,550 $440,325 $244,625
3 24-inch Wastewater Interceptor Replacement to
Arlington Interstate 20 Interconnect 45%85%40%$1,889,300 $850,185 $755,720 $283,395
4 15-inch Wastewater Interceptor Replacement in Basin
C 50%90%40%$1,070,700 $535,350 $428,280 $107,070
5 12-inch Wastewater Interceptor Replacement along
South New Hope Road 30%80%50%$1,038,700 $311,610 $519,350 $207,740
6 8-inch Wastewater Line Extension in Basin B-1 0%65%65%$422,900 $0 $274,885 $148,015
7 10/12-inch Wastewater Line Extension in Basin B-2
Phase I 0%45%45%$875,300 $0 $393,885 $481,415
8 10-inch Wastewater Line Extension in Basin B-2 Phase
II 0%50%50%$857,900 $0 $428,950 $428,950
9 8-inch Wastewater Line Extension along Oak Crest
Drive 0%30%30%$195,500 $0 $58,650 $136,850
10 8-inch Wastewater Line Replacement along Dick Price
Road 30%70%40%$455,100 $136,530 $182,040 $136,530
11 8-inch Wastewater Line Extension along Highway 287 0%70%70%$508,500 $0 $355,950 $152,550
PROPOSED TOTAL $10,188,500 $2,601,250 $4,691,280 $2,895,970
Total Wastewater Capital Improvements Cost $10,271,707 $2,631,174 $4,744,563 $2,895,970
*Utilization in 2020 on Proposed Projects indicates a portion of the project that will be used to address deficiencies within the existing system and therefore not
eligible for impact fee cost recovery for future growth.
Wastewater CIP
13
Impact Fee Eligible Costs –
Wastewater
14
Wastewater
Category
Wastewater Total
Cost
Wastewater Impact
Fee Eligible Cost
Existing Eligible Projects $83,207 $53,283
Future Eligible Projects $10,188,500 $4,691,280
Sub-Total $10,271,707 $4,744,563
Cumulative Interest*$1,431,588
Wastewater Impact Fee Eligible Cost $6,176,151
*Finance costs are based on the interest paid over a 20-year bond at a 3.0% interest rate –For Future Eligible Projects
only.
Credit –Water/Wastewater
15
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
50%
Credit
Growth In
Service Units
Maximum Allowable
Impact Fee
-
=
Credit –Water/Wastewater
16
•Chapter 395 prescribes that a utility must provide a
credit if the growth related outstanding debt is more
than Impact Fees to be collected. The remainder must
be included in the RATES.
•Utility can choose to do the detailed credit analysis, or
automatically cap the maximum allowable Impact Fee
at 50%.
•The City has opted to automatically cap the maximum
allowable Impact Fee at 50%.
Growth in Equivalent Service Meters –
Water/Wastewater
17
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
50%
Credit
Growth In
Service Units
Maximum Allowable
Impact Fee
-
=
Service Unit Equivalencies (SUE) –
Water/Wastewater
18
Meter Size
Maximum Safe
Operating Capacity(1)
(gpm)
Service Unit
Equivalents
5/8”20 0.67
3/4"30 1.00
1"50 1.67
1 1/2"100 3.33
2"160 5.33
3"350 11.67
4"600 20.00
6"1250 41.67
8"1800 60.00
10”2900 96.67
(1) Safe maximum operating capacity is based on AWWA standards C700 and C702.
Growth in Service Units –
Water/Wastewater
19
Meter
Size
2020 2030 Growth in
Service Unit
Equivalents
Number of
Meters(1)
Service Unit
Equivalents(2)
Number of
Meters(3)
Service Unit
Equivalents(2)
5/8”0 0 0 0 0
3/4"2,772 2,772 3,910 3,910 1,138
1"370 618 522 872 254
1 1/2"18 60 23 77 17
2"42 224 53 282 58
3"44 513 56 654 141
4"3 60 4 80 20
6"0 0 0 0 0
8"0 0 0 0 0
10”0 0 0 0 0
Total 3,249 4,247 4,568 5,875 1,628
(1)Meter count provided by the City of Arlington.
(2)Based on AWWA C700 and C702 Maximum Safe Operating Flow.
(3)Based on population and employment growth rates.
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee –
Water/Wastewater
20
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
50%
Credit
Growth In
Service Units
Maximum Allowable
Impact Fee
-
=
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee per
Service Unit –Water/Wastewater
21
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
50%
Credit
Growth In
Service Units
Maximum Allowable
Impact Fee
-
=
WATER WASTEWATER
Impact Fee Eligible Cost $4,958,625 $6,176,151
Credit (50%)-$2,479,313 -$3,088,076
Growth in Service Units 1,628 1,628
Max Allowable Impact Fee*$1,522 $1,896
Total $3,418
*Maximum Allowable Impact Fee is calculated for a 3/4” meter.
Roadway Impact Fee
Summary
22
Changes to Roadway CIP
•Removed Kennedale
Sublett Road 250’ east of
Vera Ln since that portion is
in the City of Arlington
•Added 2 projects
1.Collett Sublett Road
2.Swiney Hiett Road
Sublett Rd
Vera LnSwiney Hiett RdCollett Sublett Rd(Removed)
23
Roadway
CIP
24
Service
Area
Projected Growth
(veh-mi)2,479
Net CIP Capacity
Supplied (veh-mi)14,301
Capacity Consumed
by New Growth 17.3%
Thoroughfare Plan Amendments
25
•Changes
•Add Oak Crest Drive
•Update Swiney Hiett
Road to an Avenue
Thoroughfare Plan Adjustment
26
Roadway CIP Cost Development
•Construction Costs
•Engineering 10% of
Construction
•ROW $1.7/SF
•Debt Service: 3% over
20 Years
•Recoupment Projects
•Actual costs
•Data from City
County participation
•Assumed at 60%
27
add graphic
Roadway CIP
28
Cost/SU Summary
29
Cost Attributable
10-Year Growth
= Cost per Service Unit
Comparison of Collection Rate
30
Roadway 2016
(S/SU)
2021
($/SU)
Calculated Max (50%)$ 1,269 $ 1,256
Collection Rate $ 1,269 ?
Collection Rate Policy*
Residential $ 1,269.00 $ 1,256.00
Office $ 634.50 $ 628.00
Retail/Commercial $ 888.30 $ 879.20
Industrial $ 888.30 $ 879.20
Institutional $ 420.00 $ 415.70
* Assumes maximum collection rate consistent with current policy
Updated Land Use Equivalency
31
Updated Land Use Equivalency
32
ITE Dev.Ave. Trip Rate Ave. Trip Veh-Mi Per
Code Unit w/ Deductions Length Dev Unit
3 4 5 6
Hotel 310 Rooms 0.60 2.15 1.29 1.29
Movie Theater 444 Screens 14.60 2.15 31.32 36.87
Building Materials and Lumber Store 812 1000 sq. ft.1.55 2.15 3.31 7.22
Free-Standing Discount Superstore 813 1000 sq. ft.3.12 2.15 6.69 6.72
Variety Store 814 1000 sq. ft.5.13 2.15 11.00 14.63
Hardware/Paint Store 816 1000 sq. ft.1.43 2.15 3.06 7.68
Nursery (Garden Center)817 1000 sq. ft.5.21 2.15 11.16 14.89
Nursery (Wholesale)818 1000 sq. ft.3.89 2.15 8.33 8.32
Shopping Center 820 1000 sq. ft.1.86 2.15 3.99 5.25
Automobile Sales (New)840 1000 sq. ft.2.43 2.15 5.21 3.37
Automobile Sales (Used)841 1000 sq. ft.3.75 2.15 8.04 3.37
Automobile Parts Sales 843 1000 sq. ft.2.43 2.15 5.22 7.31
Tire Store 848 1000 sq. ft.2.58 2.15 5.53 6.41
Tire Superstore 849 1000 sq. ft.1.37 2.15 2.93 3.26
Supermarket 850 1000 sq. ft.3.67 2.15 7.86 13.01
Convenience Market w/ Gasoline Pumps 853 1000 sq. ft.13.50 0.35 4.74 6.61
Discount Club 857 1000 sq. ft.2.93 2.15 6.28 8.97
Home Improvement Superstore 862 1000 sq. ft.0.92 2.15 1.98 2.60
Electronic Superstore 863 1000 sq. ft.1.71 2.15 3.67 5.79
Toy/Children's Superstore 864 1000 sq. ft.3.50 2.15 7.51 10.70
Apparel Store 876 1000 sq. ft.2.88 2.15 6.19 8.22
Arts and Crafts Store 879 1000 sq. ft.4.35 2.15 9.32 13.32
Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Through Window 881 1000 sq. ft.4.57 2.15 9.79 10.84
Furniture Store 890 1000 sq. ft.0.17 2.15 0.36 0.45
DVD/Video Rental Store 896 1000 sq. ft.#N/A 2.15 0.00 7.88
Drive-in Bank 912 1000 sq. ft.10.65 2.15 22.84 27.63
Quality Restaurant 931 1000 sq. ft.3.19 2.15 6.84 9.00
High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 1000 sq. ft.4.12 2.15 8.84 12.13
Fast-Food Restaurant w/ Drive-Through Window 934 1000 sq. ft.12.58 2.15 26.98 35.02
Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop 941 Serving Positions 3.64 2.15 7.80 5.01
Automobile Care Center 942 1000 sq. ft.3.11 2.15 6.67 6.67
TOWN OF SUNNYVALE
LAND USE EQUIVALENCY TABLE
ITE Land Use 2014
Retail / Commercial
CITY OF KENNEDALE
Sample Impact Fee Calculation
33
ROADWAYS -A Two Step Process:
Step 1:Determine number of service units (vehicle-miles) generated by the
development using the equivalency table.
No. of Development x Vehicle -miles =Development's
Units per development unit Vehicle-miles
Step 2:Calculate the impact fee based on the fee per service unit for the roadway service area
where the development is located.
Development's x Cost per =Impact Fee due
Vehicle-miles Vehicle-mile from Developer
WATER/WASTEWATER:
Determine the service unit equivalency based on the development’s
meter connection size. Calculate the impact fee based on the fee per service unit.
Service Unit x Cost per =Impact Fee due
Equivalency Service Unit from Developer
Sample Calculation (2020)
34
Example: New Development located in Kennedale with collection rates for Roadway at $1,256 per vehicle-
mile; Water at $1,522 per service unit; and Wastewater at $1,896 per service unit.
1 Single-Family Dwelling
Roads:1 dwelling unit x 1.69 veh-miles/dwelling unit = 1.69 veh-miles
1.69 veh-miles x $1,256/veh-mile =$2,122.64
Water (3/4” Meter):1.00 service units x $1,522/service unit =$1,522.00
Wastewater (3/4” Meter):1.00 service units x $1,896/service unit = $1,896.00
Total Impact Fee:Roads + Water + Wastewater = $5,540.64
Impact Fee Collection Rate
Comparison and Path
Forward
35
2016/2020 Impact Fee Collection Rate
Per Service Unit Comparison
36
*Ordinance Approved on August 15th, 2016
**Rates do not include Fort Worth wholesale provider pass-through costs.
Category
2016 Impact Fee Update 2020 Impact Fee Update
Maximum
Allowable
Impact Fee
Adopted
Collection
Rate*
% of
Maximum
Allowable
Maximum
Allowable
Impact Fee
Adopted
Collection
Rate
Water**$1,487 $1,487 100%$1,522 ?
Wastewater**$1,080 $1,080 100%$1,896 ?
Roadway -
Residential
$1,269
$1,269 100%
$1,256
?
Roadway -
Office $634.50 50%?
Roadway -
Commercial $888.30 70%?
Roadway -
Industrial $888.30 70%?
Roadway -
Institutional $420.00 33%?
Comparison Cities –1 SF Residence
$7,560
$6,398 $6,300 $6,250
$5,936 $5,831
$5,541
$5,174
$4,864
$4,622
$4,489 $4,378
$2,003
$1,309
$0$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
Roadway Impact Fee*
Water Impact Fee
Wastewater Impact Fee
*Roadway Impact Fee is the average fee calculated from each service area for each comparison city.
Note: Collection Rates shown do not include wholesale provider pass-through costs.
Comparison Cities –10,000 s.f.Office
Building
$62,494
$47,322
$40,164
$36,660
$31,969 $30,640 $30,326 $30,042
$25,530
$21,369
$19,416
$15,750
$5,007
$2,186
$0$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
Roadway Impact Fee*
Water Impact Fee
Wastewater Impact Fee
*Roadway Impact Fee is the average fee calculated from each service area for each comparison city.
Note: Collection Rates shown do not include wholesale provider pass-through costs.
Comparison Cities –50,000 s.f.Light
Industrial Building
$148,892
$135,597
$128,075
$98,565 $95,550
$89,688 $88,169
$82,902
$76,547 $75,716
$50,400
$45,459
$16,021
$6,977
$0$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
$160,000
Roadway Impact Fee*
Water Impact Fee
Wastewater Impact Fee
*Roadway Impact Fee is the average fee calculated from each service area for each comparison city.
Note: Collection Rates shown do not include wholesale provider pass-through costs.
Project Milestone Schedule
40
•January 26, 2021
•FNI and City Staff meeting to review Impact Fee CIPs and Max Allowable Impact Fee calculation
•February 4, 2021
•Draft Impact Fee Report to City for Review
•February 11, 2021
•Meet with CIAC to present CIP and Max Allowable Impact Fee calculation
•February 14, 2021
•Public Notice of public hearing (30-day advertisement)
•February 16, 2021
•City Council adopts a resolution for a public hearing date at regularly scheduled City
Council meeting
•March 9, 2021
•Last day for the CIAC to submit recommendation to City Council
•March 16, 2021
•Public hearing at City Council meeting for LUA, CIP, and Impact Fee Ordinance at
regularly scheduled City Council meeting
Path Forward
41
•February 11, 2021
•Consideration/Approval of CIP and Maximum Impact
Fee Calculation
•March 9, 2021
•Last Day to Send Letter to City Council on
Recommendation for Collection Rates (Due 5 Business
Days Prior to Public Hearing)
•March 16, 2021
•Public Hearing for LUA, CIP, and Impact Fee Ordinance
at Regularly Scheduled City Council Meeting (No CIAC
Involvement Required)
Water, Wastewater, & Roadway
Impact Fee Update
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC)
Presentation #2
February 11, 2021
Thank you!