2018_05.21 CC Packet
KENNEDALE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING | May 21, 2018
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 405 MUNICIPAL DRIVE
WORK SESSION at 5:30 PM | REGULAR SESSION at 7:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
NOTE: Pursuant to §551.071, Texas Government Code, City Council reserves the right to adjourn into
Executive Session at any time during the Work Session or the Regular Session to discuss posted Executive
Session items or to seek legal advice from the City Attorney on any item posted on the agenda.
II. WORK SESSION
A. Interviews for various Advisory Boards and Commissions
B. Discuss Arlington Water Contract negotiations
C. Discuss potential appointments to Charter Study Committee
D. Discussion regarding a compensation survey and a climate survey being conducted for the
Police and Fire Departments
E. Discussion regarding budgeting strategies for Fiscal Year 2019
F. Hold a discussion and provide staff direction regarding calling of a public hearing to
consider the business climate in the City of Kennedale
G. Discussion of the process to be used for the City Manager's annual performance review
H. Discussion of items on Regular Session
III. REGULAR SESSION
IV. ROLL CALL
V. INVOCATION
VI. UNITED STATES PLEDGE AND TEXAS PLEDGE
“Honor the Texas Flag; I Pledge Allegiance to Thee, Texas, One State under God; One and Indivisible."
VII. VISITOR/CITIZENS FORUM
At this time, any person with business before the City Council not scheduled on the agenda may address the
Council, provided that an official ‘Speaker’s Request Form’ has been completed and submitted to the City Secretary
prior to the start of the meeting. All comments must be directed towards the Mayor and Council, rather than
individual Councilmembers or staff. All speakers must limit their comments to the subject matter as listed on the
‘Speaker’s Request Form.’ No formal action or discussion can be take n on these items.
VIII. REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
In addition to specific matters listed below, the City Council may receive reports about items of community interest,
including but not limited to recognition of individual officials, citizens, or departments, information regarding holiday
schedules, and upcoming or attended events.
A. Updates from the City Council
B. Updates from the City Manager
C. Updates from the Mayor
• Recognition of Public Works Director Larry Ledbetter's service to the City of Kennedale
• Recognition of Fire Chief Mike McMurray's service to the City of Kennedale
IX. MONITORING INFORMATION
A. Monthly Financials – April 2018
B. Schedule of Investment Activity for quarter ending March 31, 2018
C. Monthly EDC Financials and Activity Report
X. INCIDENTAL ITEMS
XI. REQUIRED APPROVAL ITEMS (CONSENT)
All matters listed under Required Approval Items (Consent) have been previously discussed, require little or no
deliberation, or are considered to be routine by the City Council. If discussion is desired, an item can be removed
from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.
A. Consider approval of minutes from March 19, 2018 regular meeting
B. Consider approval of minutes from April 16, 2018 regular meeting
C. Consider approval of minutes from April 23, 2018 special meeting
D. Discuss and consider acceptance of independent auditor's report (Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR)) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017
E. Consider approval of Ordinance 642, reappointing Municipal Judge Bill Lane to a two -year
term and approval of a two -year extension of the municipal judge’s contract
F. Consider approval of tax collection contract with Tarrant County
G. Consider Approval of Amendment 2 to the Engineering Contract with Freese and Nichols
for the TxDOT New Hope Road Bridge Replacement Project
H. Consider approval of the engineering contract with Freese and Nichols for the local match
projects related to the New Hope Road Bridge TxDOT Bridge Replacement Project
I. Consider approval of Resolution 525, authorizing the Mayor to sign the Advanced Funding
Agreement (AFA) for the New Hope Road Bridge Replacement Project with TXDOT
XII. DECISION ITEMS
A. CASE # PZ 18 -01 to conduct a public hearing, receive comments, and consider approval
on a request by Skorburg Retail Corp., for a Zoning change and Concept Plan for
approximately 23.1 acres from “AG” Agricultural District to “PD” Planned Development
District for a new ne ighborhood consisting of 92 single -family lots on property located at
1118 and 1132 Kennedale Sublett Road, legal description of Lots 4R1 & 3B1, JM Estes
Home Tracts, Tarrant County, Texas.
1. Staff Presentation
2. Applicant Presentation
3. Public Hearing
4. Applicant Response
5. Staff Response and Summary
B. Discuss and provide staff direction regarding the creation of a new bank account
specifically for the Kennedale Economic Development Corporation and/or combined utility
funds
C. Consider making appointments to fill vacancies on various Advisory Boards and
Commissions
XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Council may meet in Closed Session at any time during the Work Session or the Regular
Session, pursuant to the following sections of the Texas Government Code :
Section 551.071 for consultation with the City Attorney pertaining to any matter in which the duty of the
City Attorney under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of P rofessional Conduct may conflict with the Open
Meetings Act, includin g discussion on any item posted on the agend a , legal issues regarding the Open
Meetings Act , and the following:
A. Appointment and removal authority regarding members of City Boards and Commissions
B. Briefing on Arlington Water Contract
Section 551.074 deliberation of the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties,
d iscipline, or dismissal of a public officer or employee :
C . Discussion of City Manager's Annual Evaluation
XV. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Kennedale will provide for reasonable
accommodations for persons attending City Council meetings. This building is wheelchair accessible, and parking
spaces for disabled citizens are available. Requests for sign int erpreter services must be made forty -eight (48) hours
prior to the meetings. Please contact the City Secretary at 817.985.2104 or (TDD) 1.800.735.2989.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that a copy of the May 21, 2018 agenda was posted on the bulletin board next to the main entrance of City
Hall, 405 Municipal Drive, of the City of Kennedale, Texas, in a place convenient and readily accessible to the
general public at all times, and that said agenda was posted at least 72 hours preceding the scheduled time of said
meeting, in accordance with Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code.
____________________________
LESLIE GALLOWAY, CITY SECRETARY
ARLINGTON/KENNEDALE
COLLABORATION
Previous discussion –Oct. 10, 2017
Informal Report to Council Mayor and
Council on possible interlocal
cooperation agreement
COLLABORATION GOALS
Arlington will take responsibility for operation and maintenance of Kennedale Water and Wastewater System.
Kennedale will retain ownership of all utility assets in place at time of agreement.
Kennedale, inside City, water and sewer rates will be transitioned to Arlington rates or an alternate rate structure that will significantly reduce costs for Kennedale residents.
Eligible Kennedale employees will be hired by Arlington and have access to wages and benefits currently available to similar employees.
COLLABORATION GOALS
Kennedale will transition its water supply to
Arlington to the fullest extent possible.
Arlington will honor all existing contractual
obligations of Kennedale that cannot be
eliminated by the change in operation
responsibility.
The agreement will have a term which will
allow the Cities to evaluate the viability of
the collaboration.
SYSTEM COMPARISON
City of Kennedale City of Arlington
# of Water Accounts 2,927 102,757
# of Sewer Accounts 2,551 100,932
O & M Budget $ 1,649,405.00 $ 10,428,845.00
O & M Costs per Customer (Water/Sewer)$ 301.10 $ 51.20
Average Water Bill $ 57.83 $ 28.29
Average Sewer Bill $ 55.61 $ 29.66
Monthly Fixed Fee for Water $ 26.00 $ 10.30
Monthly Fixed Fee for Sewer $ 36.00 $ 12.94
Average Residential Usage 8,000 W/4,000 S (est) 7,000 W/4,000 S
Average Total System Usage 11,000 W/9,000 S (est ) 12,000 W/9,000 S
Employees (Full -time and Part -time)10.50 178.50
Customers per Employee (W/S customers)522 1,141
Water/Sewer Accounts Added 2013 -2017 4,692
CONTRACT HIGHLIGHTS
Initial term of 2 years –renewable in 5 -year increments.
Annual maintenance and repair limit.
Single maintenance expenditure limit.
Kennedale employees (approx. 10) may be offered employment in same or similar positions, subject to successful results on all pre -employment screenings.
CONTRACT HIGHLIGHTS
Kennedale retains ownership of all system assets.
Funding is provided in Arlington’s fee to construct an interconnect to deliver Arlington water to Kennedale.
Arlington will provide Kennedale with an annual capital improvement plan.
Kennedale will grant Arlington transmission rights for water distribution at a set fee with a fee adjustment formula.
Both parties perceive this
collaboration will be financially
beneficial to the residents of
Arlington and Kennedale.
QUESTIONS?
Page 1 of 7
CITY MANAGER
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Evaluation P eriod: April 1, 2017 to C urrent
Each Council member should complete this evaluation form, sign below, initial the
remaining pages , and return to City Secretary Leslie Galloway
(lgalloway@cityofkennedale.com ) by 5:00 p.m., T uesday, June 14, 2018 .
A discussion of the responses is scheduled for the Executive Session of the Monday,
June 18 , 2018 meeting.
SIGNATURE
PRINTED NAME
DATE
INSTRUCTIONS
This evaluation form contains ten categories of evaluation criteria. Each category
contains a statement to describe a behavior standard in that category. For each
statement, use the following scale to indicate your rating of the city manager's
performance.
5 = Excellent (almost always exceeds the performance standard)
4 = Above average (generally exceeds the performance standard)
3 = Average (generally meets the performance standard)
2 = Below average (usually does not meet the performance standard)
1 = Poor (rarely meets the performance standard)
Any item left blank will be interpreted as a score of "3 = Average"
This evaluation form also contains a provision for entering narrative comments,
including an opportunity to enter responses to specific questions and an opportunity to
list any comments you believe appropriate and pertinent to the rating period. Please
write legibly.
Leave all pages of this evaluation form attached. Initial each page. Sign and date the
cover page. On the date space of the cover page, enter the date the evaluation form
was submitted. All evaluations presented prior to the deadline identified on the cover
page will be summarized into a performance evaluation to be presented by the
governing body to the city manager as part of the agenda for the meeting indicated on
the cover page.
PERFORMANCE CATEGORY SCORING
1. INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS
__ Diligent and thorough in the discharge of duties, "self-starter"
__ Exercises good judgment
__ Displays enthusiasm, cooperation, and will to adapt
__ Mental and physical stamina appropriate for the position
__ Exhibits composure, appearance and attitude appropriate for executive position
Add the values from above and enter the subtotal __ + 5 = __ score for this category
Page 2 of 7 Initials
2. PROFESSIONAL SKILLS AND STATUS
__ Maintains knowledge of current developments affecting the practice of local government
management
__ Demonstrates a capacity for innovation and creativity
__ Anticipates and analyzes problems to develop effective approaches for solving them
__ Willing to try new ideas proposed by governing body members and/or staff
__ Sets a professional example by handling affairs of the public office in a fair and impartial
manner
Add the values from above and enter the subtotal __ + 5 = __ score for this category
3. RELATIONS WITH ELECTED MEMBERS OF THE GOVERNING BODY
__ Carries out directives of the body as a whole as opposed to those of anyone member or
minority group
__ Sets meeting agendas that reflect the guidance of the governing body and avoids
unnecessary involvement in administrative actions
__ Disseminates complete and accurate information equally to all members in a timely
manner
__ Assists by facilitating decision making without usurping authority
__ Responds well to requests, advice, and constructive criticism
Add the values from above and enter the subtotal __ + 5 = __ score for this category
4. POLICY EXECUTION
__ Implements governing body actions in accordance with the intent of council
__ Supports the actions of the governing body after a decision has been reached, both
inside and outside the organization
__ Understands, supports, and enforces local government's laws, policies, and ordinances
__ Reviews ordinance and policy procedures periodically to suggest improvements to their
effectiveness
__ Offers workable alternatives to the governing body for changes in law or policy when an
existing policy or ordinance is no longer practical
Add the values from above and enter the subtotal __ + 5 = __ score for this category
Page 3 of 7 Initials
5. REPORTING
__ Provides regular information and reports to the governing body concerning matters of
importance to the local government, using the city charter as guide
__ Responds in a timely manner to requests from the governing body for special reports
__ Takes the initiative to provide information, advice, and recommendations to the
governing body on matters that are non-routine and not administrative in nature
__ Reports produced by the manager are accurate, comprehensive, concise and written to
their intended audience
__ Produces and handles reports in a way to convey the message that affairs of the
organization are open to public scrutiny
Add the values from above and enter the sUbtotal __ + 5 = __ score for this category
6. CITIZEN RELATIONS
__ Responsive to requests from citizens
__ Demonstrates a dedication to service to the community and its citizens
__ Maintains a nonpartisan approach in dealing with the news media
__ Meets with and listens to members of the community to discuss their concerns and
strives to understand their interests
__ Gives an appropriate effort to maintain citizen satisfaction with city services
Add the values from above and enter the subtotal __ + 5 = __ score for this category
7. STAFFING
__ Recruits and retains competent personnel for staff positions
__ Applies an appropriate level of supervision to improve any areas of substandard
performance
__ Stays accurately informed and appropriately concerned about employee relations
__ Professionally manages the compensation and benefits plan
__ Promotes training and development opportunities for employees at all levels of the
organization
Add the values from above and enter the subtotal __ + 5 = __ score for this category
Page 4 of 7 Initials
8. SUPERVISION
__ Encourages heads of departments to make decisions within their jurisdictions with
minimal city manager involvement, yet maintains general control of operations by
providing the right amount of communication to the staff
__ Instills confidence and promotes initiative in subordinates through supportive rather than
restrictive controls for their programs while still monitoring operations at the department
level
__ Develops and maintains a friendly and informal relationship with the staff and work force
in general, yet maintains the professional dignity of the city manager's office
__ Sustains or improves staff performance by evaluating the performance of staff members
at least annually, setting goals and objectives for them, periodically assessing their
progress, and providing appropriate feedback
__ Encourages teamwork, innovation, and effective problem-solving among the staff
members
Add the values from above and enter the subtotal __ ..;. 5 = __ score for this category
9. FISCAL MANAGEMENT
__ Prepares a balanced budget to provide services at a level directed by council
__ Makes the best possible use of available funds, conscious of the need to operate the
local government efficiently and effectively
__ Prepares a budget and budgetary recommendations in an intelligent and accessible
format
__ Ensures actions and decisions reflect an appropriate level of responsibility for financial
planning and accountability
__ Appropriately monitors and manages fiscal activities of the organization
Add the values from above and enter the sUbtotal __ ..;. 5 = __ score for this category
Page 5 of 7 Initials
10. COMMUNITY
__ Shares responsibility for addressing the difficult issues facing the city
__ Avoids unnecessary controversy
__ Cooperates with neighboring communities and the county
__ Helps the council address future needs and develop adequate plans to address long
term trends
__ Cooperates with other regional, state and federal government agencies
Add the values from above and enter the sUbtotal __ + 5 = __ score for this category
NARRATIVE EVALUATION
What would you identify as the manager's strength(s), expressed in terms of the principle
results achieved during the rating period? ___________________ _
What performance area(s) would you identify as most critical for improvement? _____ _
Page 6 of 7 Initials
What constructive suggestions or assistance can you offer the manager to enhance
pe~ormance? __________________________________________________________ __
What other comments do you have for the manager; e.g., priorities, expectations, goals or
objectives for the new rating period? _________________________________________ __
Page 7 of 7 Initials
PUBLIC WORKS
Larry Ledbetter | Since September 2007
817 -985 -2171 lledbetter@cityofkennedale.com
Larry g raduated from Northwood University in 1991 with a BBA , and is
licensed by TCEQ as a B -Class Water Operator and Waste Water Operator.
He has 40 years ’ experience in local government, including the Cities of
Aledo and Arlington. During his career , he has served as the Texas Water
Utilities Association (TWUA ) Pretreatment and Environmental Section
Chairman and ha s written numerous articles for the TWUA Journal. Larry
has received numerous awards , including the TWUA Lifet ime
Achievement Award and the Pretreatment and Environmental Section,
FILE Award. He has been a guest speaker and instructor at numerous EPA
Region 6 and TWUA c onferences and workshops . Larry co -authored a white paper (The Tale of Two
Cities ) for the Texas Section American Water Works Association (T AWWA ), r eceived Haz -Mat
certification through Texas A&M , and was a Haz -Mat first -responder for the C ity of Arlington F ire
D epartment for 10 years. Locally, he ’s a charter member of the Kennedale Rotary Club.
WHAT I DO FOR KENNEDALE
During his tenure , Larry has vastly improved both the city ’s infrastructure and the working
environment in the Public Works Department . The last three inspections by TCEQ resulted in zero
violations ; t he Kennedale Water Utility is n ow a TCEQ A dvisory City ; the city added TownCenter
and Rogers Farm Park s and expanded Sonora Park ; m any streets have been rebuilt or newly
constructed; t he water system was made more robust and reliable by adding the City of Fort Worth
as an additional wat er source and installing a 16 ” water line . Larry has also instituted chloramine as
our water treatment chemical, improved the booster pump , installed e nergy -saving equipment,
repaired aging waste water lines utilizing Community Development Block Grant (CDBG ) funding ,
reduced Inflow and Infiltration (I&I ) – saving money on waste water treatment costs , installed
automated metering system through Global Water FATHOM , and implemented valve box cleaning
and valve exercising p rotocols . Under his leadership, th e City of Kennedale Public Works
D epartment now maintains excellent working relationship s with TCEQ, Tarrant C ounty , and
neighboring municipalities – all of which prove professionally and financially beneficial . Another of
Larry ’s priority is promoting p ro fessionalism , personal development, and training among his staff –
which he sees as one of the best in the business. He has been known to say that his staff and the
services they provide have gone from 0 -100.
AWAY FROM WORK
Larry grew up in the country, and now s pend s most of his free time at his ranch working cattle ,
repairing fences, farming, ranching, hunting, and fishing . It ’s a lifestyle that requires hard work, but
one he really enjoy s – and definitely gets him plenty of exercise. He enjoys classic rock, country,
Green Day, Jimmie Hendrix, and Stevie Ray Vaughn; and provides guitar, bass, and vocals in a band
with his friends at special events. Larry enjoys reading about the Old West, and one of his favorite
books is Lonesome Dove . One of his favorit e movies is Raiders of the Lost Arc – one of the greatest,
ground -breaking cinematic marvels.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Mike McMurray | Since March 2008
817 -985 -2151 mmcmurray@cityofkennedale.com
Mike is a Texas Master Firefighter who retired from the Hurst Fire
Department as Battalion Fire Chief before coming to Kennedale. He has an
AA Degree in Fire Protection Technology from Tarrant County College and
is a Fire Service Chief Executive Officer. H is excellent relationships within
the community recently led to Carl Hall of Speed Fab -Crete offering to
send his crew out to perform some much -needed repairs on the Fire
Station, at no cost to the city. Mike is also dedicated to securing grant
funding to keep his responders safe. In 2016, KFD received a $20,000
grant from Firehouse Subs Public Safety Foundation for new turnout gear,
and a grant from Koch Pipeline through their Helping Heroes program. Mike is devoted to hiring
dedicated Fire Fighters, EMTs, and Paramedics who will provide the highest quality fire rescue and
emergency medical response. The department takes great pride in their ability to serve customers
in an average response time of four minutes or less. The department maintains a strong mut ual -aid
partnership with all of the suburban cities in South Tarrant County as well as Arlington and Fort
Worth. Mike is well -known for having created a widely used Incident Command Template in the
form of a macro -enabled Microsoft Excel file. This tool va stly improves the organization,
management, and tracking of Fire and Rescue resources during emergency incidents and training
simulations. He freely shares this template for use by other fire officers at
www.cityofkennedale.com/ics. (Attribution to Chief M cMurray is required if the file is published,
referenced, or shared.)
WHAT I DO FOR KENNEDALE
Mike is responsible for leading fire protection and emergency responders and serves as the city ’s
Emergency Management Coordinator. Under his supervision, the city ’s Fire Insurance Rating Class
was improved from Class IV to Class III. The Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection
Classification (PPC™) rating is used by insurance companies to set premiums for homeowner and
commercial property insurance wi thin our jurisdiction. This rating increase came after an extensive
on -site survey of our emergency communications system, fire staffing and equipment, and water
supply facilities. Mike ’s fire fighters are also dedicated to community service work, includin g their
annual participation in the MDA Fill the Boot program. The Kennedale Professional Firefighters
Association (KPFFA) also hosts an annual Angel Tree, which provided gifts, clothing, and winter
coats to 100 children in 2016, and helped a family who lo st their home to a fire.
AWAY FROM WORK
Mike is a Christian, a husband and father, a Rangers and Cowboys fan, and an avid fisherman. He
has many fishing stories, including the time a 30 -foot whale shark swam within ten feet of his boat
when he was about two miles off Mustang Island. Another day, he and a friend boated 48 kingfish in
four hours – but he says his all -time favorite fishing partner will always be his wife. He also belongs
to the Kennedale Rotary Club.
Favorite Quote: “Of all sad words of ton gue or pen the saddest are these – It could have been.”
– John Greenleaf Whittier
CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
April 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
REVENUES YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD EARNED EARNED REMAINING
GENERAL FUND 4,616,532 $ 6,174,185 $ 6,386,639 $ 191,957 $ 5,025,558 $ 74.8%78.7%1,361,081 $
OTHER GENERAL FUNDS 528,033 $ 1,621,385 $ 973,127 $ 4,292 $ 359,814 $ 32.6%37.0%613,313 $
GENERAL FUND 5,144,565 $ 7,795,570 $ 7,359,766 $ 196,249 $ 5,385,372 $ 66.0%73.2%1,974,394 $
-$
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,225,088 $ 1,453,154 $ 1,665,934 $ 44,519 $ 1,338,508 $ 84.3%80.3%327,426 $
-$
WATER/SEWER FUND 2,455,561 $ 4,950,455 $ 4,479,449 $ 353,689 $ 2,415,326 $ 49.6%53.9%2,064,123 $
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND 241,030 $ 463,360 $ 256,664 $ 22,016 $ 153,118 $ 52.0%59.7%103,546 $
WATER IMPACT FUND 66,726 $ 152,432 $ 120,450 $ 5,534 $ 98,457 $ 43.8%81.7%21,993 $
SEWER IMPACT FUND 19,636 $ 41,762 $ 28,625 $ 2,785 $ 52,584 $ 47.0%183.7%(23,959)$
WATER/SEWER FUND 2,782,953 $ 5,608,009 $ 4,885,188 $ 384,024 $ 2,719,485 $ 49.6%55.7%2,165,703 $ -$
EDC4B FUND 259,793 $ 522,549 $ 575,878 $ 54,424 $ 616,139 $ 49.7%107.0%(40,261)$ -$
CAPITAL FUND 73,602 $ 193,473 $ 162,535 $ 4,571 $ 93,795 $ 38.0%57.7%68,740 $ -$
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 93,593 $ 95,393 $ 25,067 $ -$ 1,750 $ 98.1%7.0%23,317 $
TOTAL REVENUES 9,579,594 $ 15,668,147 $ 14,674,368 $ 683,787 $ 10,155,049 $ 61.1%69.2%4,519,319 $
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY BUDGET % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
EXPENDITURES YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD EXPENSED EXPENSED REMAINING
GENERAL FUND 3,426,328 $ 6,195,408 $ 6,453,680 $ 475,562 $ 3,516,864 $ 55.3%54.5%2,936,816 $
OTHER GENERAL FUND 971,560 $ 1,820,470 $ 920,034 $ 54,491 $ 449,314 $ 53.4%48.8%470,720 $
GENERAL FUND 4,397,888 $ 8,015,879 $ 7,373,714 $ 530,053 $ 3,966,178 $ 54.9%53.8%3,407,536 $ -$
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,176,841 $ 1,423,034 $ 1,663,884 $ 121,044 $ 1,288,954 $ 82.7%77.5%374,930 $ -$
WATER/SEWER FUND 2,131,789 $ 4,244,829 $ 4,258,316 $ 130,569 $ 2,121,448 $ 50.2%49.8%2,136,868 $
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND 8,958 $ 52,571 $ 271,303 $ 8,958 $ 81,760 $ 17.0%30.1%189,543 $
WATER IMPACT FUND -$ 154,415 $ 153,573 $ -$ -$ 0.0%153,573 $
SEWER IMPACT FUND -$ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ -$ -$ 0.0%60,000 $
WATER/SEWER FUND 2,140,747 $ 4,511,814 $ 4,743,192 $ 139,527 $ 2,203,208 $ 47.4%46.4%2,539,984 $ -$
EDC4B FUND 445,974 $ 604,408 $ 592,963 $ 202,555 $ 554,722 $ 73.8%93.6%38,241 $ -$
CAPITAL FUND 89,081 $ 168,210 $ 175,170 $ -$ 7,293 $ 53.0%4.2%167,877 $ -$
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND 94,361 $ 104,097 $ 22,984 $ -$ 9,971 $ 90.6%43.4%13,013 $ 0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,344,892 $ 14,827,443 $ 14,571,907 $ 993,179 $ 8,030,326 $ 56.3%55.1%6,541,581 $
REVENUE SUMMARY BY FUND
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY FUND
CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
April 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
GENERAL FUND YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD EXPENSED EXPENSED REMAINING
CITY MANAGER 204,386 $ 356,066 $ 352,423 $ 35,453 $ 205,608 $ 57.4%58.3%146,815 $
MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL 50,897 $ 129,553 $ 115,113 $ 7,732 $ 80,664 $ 39.3%70.1%34,449 $
CITY SECRETARY 78,439 $ 152,017 $ 144,246 $ 8,031 $ 76,423 $ 51.6%53.0%67,823 $
MUNICIPAL COURT 56,220 $ 11,003 $ 128,197 $ 9,216 $ 61,454 $ 511.0%47.9%66,743 $
HUMAN RESOURCES 72,291 $ 110,036 $ 128,583 $ 5,020 $ 79,837 $ 65.7%62.1%48,746 $
FINANCE 192,825 $ 293,954 $ 301,564 $ 31,065 $ 213,184 $ 65.6%70.7%88,380 $
POLICE 1,261,538 $ 2,190,318 $ 2,405,689 $ 185,853 $ 1,280,883 $ 57.6%53.2%1,124,806 $
FIRE 942,292 $ 1,679,349 $ 1,835,873 $ 121,695 $ 967,572 $ 56.1%52.7%868,301 $
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 158,114 $ 305,758 $ 341,663 $ 19,270 $ 133,477 $ 51.7%39.1%208,186 $
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER 26,934 $ 66,084 $ 51,439 $ 3,481 $ 27,255 $ 40.8%53.0%24,184 $
LIBRARY 150,152 $ 284,790 $ 258,031 $ 19,452 $ 145,938 $ 52.7%56.6%112,093 $
NONDEPARTMENTAL 232,241 $ 504,400 $ 390,859 $ 29,295 $ 244,569 $ 46.0%62.6%146,290 $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,426,329 $ 6,083,328 $ 6,453,680 $ 475,563 $ 3,516,864 $ 56.3%54.5%2,936,816 $
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY BUDGET % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
WATER/SEWER FUND YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD EXPENSED EXPENSED REMAINING
UTILITY BILLING 487,918 $ 1,011,907 $ 1,237,043 $ 38,484 $ 475,328 $ 48.2%38.4%761,715 $
WATER OPERATIONS 680,629 $ 1,043,692 $ 1,649,405 $ 90,219 $ 843,671 $ 65.2%51.2%805,734 $
DEBT 461,034 $ 271,274 $ 677,361 $ -$ 464,750 $ 170.0%68.6%212,611 $
W&S CAPITAL 46,397 $ 181,782 $ 39,796 $ -$ 2,765 $ 6.9%37,031 $
NONDEPARTMENTAL 455,810 $ 1,736,173 $ 654,711 $ 1,866 $ 334,934 $ 26.3%51.2%319,777 $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,131,788 $ 4,244,827 $ 4,258,316 $ 130,569 $ 2,121,448 $ 50.2%49.8%2,136,868 $
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY BUDGET % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
STREET IMPROVEMENT FUND YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD EXPENSED EXPENSED REMAINING
STREETS 363,467 $ 728,593 $ 698,143 $ 37,231 $ 320,192 $ 49.9%45.9%377,951 $
PARKS MAINTENANCE 43,150 $ 82,981 $ 161,368 $ 3,623 $ 34,957 $ 52.0%21.7%126,411 $
CAPITAL 281,935 $ 331,716 $ 60,523 $ 32 $ 32 $ 0.1%60,491 $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 688,552 $ 1,143,290 $ 920,034 $ 40,886 $ 355,181 $ 60.2%38.6%564,853 $
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY BUDGET % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
EDC4B FUNDS YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD EXPENSED EXPENSED REMAINING
ADMINISTRATION 115,799 $ 192,298 $ 195,517 $ 3,758 $ 64,391 $ 60.2%32.9%131,126 $
DEBT SERVICE 300,678 $ 234,250 $ 322,365 $ 130,927 $ 225,613 $ 128.4%70.0%96,752 $
TOWN SHOPPING CENTER 28,416 $ 75,209 $ 45,362 $ 10,869 $ 146,262 $ 37.8%322.4%(100,900)$
TOWNCENTER REDEVELOPMENT 1,080 $ 12,653 $ -$ 57,000 $ 118,455 $ #DIV/0!(118,455)$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 445,973 $ 514,408 $ 563,244 $ 202,554 $ 554,721 $ 86.7%98.5%8,523 $
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT
Year October November December January February March April May June July August September Total
FY2018 103,820 $ 114,506 $ 86,956 $ 95,425 $ 163,502 $ 95,017 $ 123,760 $ 782,985 $
FY2017 88,748 $ 116,156 $ 81,855 $ 88,956 $ 105,794 $ 78,644 $ 87,130 $ 100,121 $ 80,241 $ 100,943 $ 49,590 $ 86,549 $ 1,064,725 $
FY2016 93,137 $ 119,137 $ 97,985 $ 75,878 $ 116,006 $ 87,589 $ 79,516 $ 114,543 $ 83,718 $ 84,586 $ 87,693 $ 91,377 $ 1,131,165 $
FY2015 71,955 $ 94,438 $ 82,545 $ 73,782 $ 107,571 $ 72,312 $ 81,193 $ 119,350 $ 128,463 $ 165,756 $ 146,297 $ 177,697 $ 1,321,359 $
FY2014 65,971 $ 89,600 $ 94,982 $ 67,373 $ 97,781 $ 69,685 $ 79,236 $ 93,957 $ 77,496 $ 71,927 $ 86,597 $ 67,978 $ 962,584 $
FY2013 100,850 $ 93,890 $ 70,338 $ 60,406 $ 90,009 $ 62,374 $ 60,955 $ 96,061 $ 63,409 $ 67,304 $ 83,919 $ 78,075 $ 927,591 $
FY2012 94,619 $ 111,587 $ 115,048 $ 89,778 $ 92,977 $ 73,453 $ 111,689 $ 123,691 $ 73,106 $ 122,489 $ 80,038 $ 82,836 $ 1,171,313 $
*Net payment after correcting an audit error.-$
Industry Amount % Change Adjusted Chang YTD FYTD
Manufacturing $29,597.21 374.61%-29.52%$98,193.62 $114,207.02
Retail $18,989.78 -4.98%39.16%$96,264.69 $164,373.86
Wholesale $18,608.72 17.43%-81.76%$84,564.08 $141,679.51
Agricultural $15,907.27 132.10%0.00%$16,378.42 $26,097.88
Professional Services $15,550.18 -4.98%9.32%$62,746.58 $111,759.14
General Services $15,473.02 8.44%9.51%$85,053.77 $162,994.59
Food $10,812.14 24.80%-20.11%$36,597.06 $61,353.96
Miscellaneous $281.42 75.49%-29.04%$815.16 $1,602.36
Accomodation $0.00 0.00%0.00%$0.00 $0.00
Sales Tax By Month
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
October November December January February March April May June July August September
Sales Tax vs Expectation
FY 2018
Five Year Average
City of Kennedale, Texas
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
For The Quarter Ending March 31, 2018
SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS FOR THE QUARTER
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO ALLOWABLE BREAKDOWN
MONTHLY BALANCES- INVESTMENTS
Investment Pool Account Name Interest Rate January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 Interest Earned
Texas Daily Consolidated Cash 0.35%31,845.91 $ 31,880.08 $ 31,920.58 $ 110.95 $
TexStar Consolidated Cash 0.34%331,623.02 331,966.93 332,389.70 1,129.62
TexPool $2.0M CO Bond 0.34%29,848.98 29,879.74 29,918.22 102.14
TexPool Central Deposit 0.37%5,771,847.54 4,392,131.65 4,458,231.04 16,596.61
TOTAL INVESTMENT POOLS 6,165,165.45 $ 4,785,858.40 $ 4,852,459.54 $ 17,939.32 $
MONTHLY BALANCES- WELLSFARGO
Bank Account Name Interest Rate January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 Interest Earned
Wellsfargo Consolidated Cash N/A 685,198.93 $ 1,524,777.26 $ 1,799,493.12 $
Wellsfargo Payroll Clearing 0.04%-0.05%42,619.70 43,207.25 112.03 1.77
Wellsfargo Section 125 Flex 0.04%-0.05%- 345.16 345.16
Wellsfargo Dick Price Rd 0.005%- - -
Wellsfargo Health Reimbursement 0.00%- - 867.00
Wellsfargo Employee Health Benefit Trust 0.00%5.08 5.50 5.56 0.84
TOTAL WELLSFARGO 727,823.71 $ 1,568,335.17 $ 1,800,822.87 $ 2.61 $
TOTAL MONTHLY BALANCES- ALL 6,892,989.16 $ 6,354,193.57 $ 6,653,282.41 $ 17,941.93 $
TRANSACTION ACTIVITY- INVESTMENTS Balance Balance
Investment Pool Account Name 12/31/2017 Deposits Withdrawls Interest 3/31/2018
Texas Daily Consolidated Cash 31,809.63 $ -$ -$ 110.95 $ 31,920.58 $
TexStar Consolidated Cash 331,260.08 - - 1,129.62 332,389.70
TexPool $2.0M CO Bond 29,816.08 - - 102.14 29,918.22
TexPool Central Deposit 3,420,015.96 3,551,731.24 (2,530,112.77) 16,596.61 4,458,231.04
TOTAL INVESTMENT POOLS 3,812,901.75 $ 3,551,731.24 $ (2,530,112.77)$ 17,939.32 $ 4,852,459.54 $
TRANSACTION ACTIVITY- WELLSFARGO Balance Balance
Bank Account Name 12/31/2017 Deposits Withdrawls Interest 3/31/2018
Wellsfargo Consolidated Cash 1,980,203.79 $ 4,388,998.01 $ (4,569,708.68)$ -$ 1,799,493.12 $
Wellsfargo Payroll Clearing 196.57 1,020,577.64 (1,020,662.18) 1.77 112.03
Wellsfargo Section 125 Flex - 2,085.37 (1,740.21) - 345.16
Wellsfargo Health Reimbursement - 4,266.00 (3,399.00) - 867.00
Wellsfargo Employee Health Benefit Trust 4.72 130,986.10 (130,985.26) 0.84 5.56
TOTAL WELLSFARGO 1,815,446.12 $ 5,546,913.12 $ (5,726,495.33)$ 2.61 $ 1,800,822.87 $
The City's main objectives in managing the portfolio are as follows:suitability,preservation &safety of principal,liquidity,marketability,diversification,and
yield.
Certificates of Deposit (25%),Investment Pools (100%)*,Money Market Mutual Funds (100%)*,Repurchase Agreements (50%)*,Government Obligations
(25%),US Treasury &US Agency Callables (25%),US Government Agencies &Instrumentalities (100%),and US Treasury Notes/Bills (100%)
*(no more than 50% in any individual pool, fund, or repurchase agreement)
CITY OF KENNEDALE, TEXAS
INVESTMENT REPORT
FOR QUARTER ENDING March 31, 2018
The Quarterly Investment Report provides the City's investment portfolio position as of the report period indicated above.Fund of the City are invested in
accordance with the City of Kennedale Investment Policy as originally adopted on September 13, 2001 and subsequently reviewed in October of 2016.
99.5%of the City of Kennedale's investments are owned by the Pooled Cash Fund.The remaining .5%goes to the $2.0M 2010 CO Bond Fund,$1.7M TX
Leverage Fund,and Clearing Funds.As of the reporting quarter,72.94%of the City's investments are in investment pools,and 27.06%are invested in money
market savings accounts.
CASH BREAKDOWN BY FUND January 2018 February 2018 March 2018
01- General Fund $3,274,554.84 $3,368,644.76 $3,155,900.66
02- Debt Service Fund $720,545.32 $52,194.09 $74,551.58
04- Capital Project Fund $55,495.24 $60,327.95 $60,376.21
05- Capital Replacement Fund $390,746.88 $387,970.07 $384,010.76
07- Storm Drainage Utility Fund $41,031.32 $61,009.06 $80,011.40
10- Water/Sewer Fund $1,154,720.25 $941,534.66 $1,047,486.87
12- Court Security Fund $15,342.96 $15,570.05 $15,879.98
13- Capital Bond Fund $ - $ - $ -
14- Park Dedication Fund $236,085.95 $236,178.43 $236,383.87
15- Economic Development Fund $249,512.82 $301,044.73 $227,946.50
16- Court Technology Fund $4,225.56 $4,515.84 $4,915.02
17- Streets Improvement Fund $285,156.72 $310,113.54 $343,963.87
18- Juvenile Case Manager Fund $18,803.44 $18,105.64 $17,447.66
19- EDC4B Capital Bond Fund $ - $ - $ -
21- TIF #1 New Hope Fund -$8,858.42 -$9,858.42 -$18,829.78
31- Police Seizure Fund $ - $ - $ -
32- Library Building Fund $3,008.93 $3,211.18 $3,449.04
34- LEOSE Fund $155.49 $1,940.35 $1,905.49
41- Park Rec/Other Donation Fund $21,718.84 $21,121.47 $19,813.82
45- Roadway Impact Fee Fund $160,121.39 $182,960.61 $207,151.47
61- Water Impact Fee Fund $150,528.19 $181,644.84 $210,519.46
62- Sewer Impact Fee Fund $101,917.55 $116,898.22 $136,425.60
65- Water Improvement Fund $ - $ - $ -
83- Tree Reforestation Fund $68,351.63 $68,404.42 $68,463.86
85- Unclaimed Property Fund $1,990.24 $1,990.24 $1,990.24
95- EDC Reserve Fund $120,941.97 $121,035.38 $121,140.55
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 7,066,097.11 $ 6,446,557.11 $ 6,400,904.13 $
-
50,000.00
100,000.00
150,000.00
200,000.00
250,000.00
300,000.00
350,000.00
January
2018 February
2018 March
2018
Other Accounts
$2.0M CO Bond
Payroll Clearing
Texas Daily
TexStar
-
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
January
2018
February
2018
March
2018
Main Accounts
Central Deposit
Wellsfargo
-
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
January
2018 February
2018 March
2018
Holding Accounts
Section 125 Flex
Employee Health
Benefit Trust
0.48% 5.00%
67.47%
27.06%
Distribution of Money
Texas Daily
TexStar
TexPool
Wellsfargo
1 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
Budget Amendment
15-4885-00-00- Sale of Asset- Change to 349,179 to incorporate hotel land sale
15-5403-02-00 Building Maintenance- Change from 25,112 to 125,112 for town center redesign
15-5847-03-00 Construction- Change to $110,000 for further town center construction
Monthly Information
1. $31,672 Sales Tax continues to outperform expectations, partially due to new business coming on the books
2. Due to staff turnover, this month's report does may not have every typical end of month journal entry.
3. Paid for parking lot repais and beginning of building one renovation
4. EDC continues to explore findings tenants to fill out the town center.
5. Danielle Clarke is continuing to acclimate as EDC manager
Brady Olsen
Finance Director
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FUND 15- OPERATING FUND (ALL BILLS AND REVENUE RECEIVED IN THIS FUND)
FUND 19- CAPITAL BOND FUND (REMAINING CAPITAL MONEY)
FUND 95- RESERVE FUND FOR DEBT REQUIREMENTS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FINANCIALS SUMMARY
Rental Fees, MMD Tax and Rental Insurance are reported on the Accrual Basis of Accounting, while all
other revenues and expenditures are reported on the Cash Basis. This procedure has been in effect for
several years, but can be changed should the Board wish.
2 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
EDC CASH POSITION
FY17-18
CATEGORY DESCRIPTION YTD
FROM PREVIOUS MONTHS REPORT:
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE - FUND 15 (Operating Cash)307,412 $
BEGINNING TEXPOOL BALANCE - FUND 15 (Operating Investments)-$
BEGINNING TEXPOOL BALANCE - FUND 19 (Unspent bond proceeds)29,849 $
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE - FUND 95 (Required reserves)120,942 $
BEGINNING CASH BALANCE - TOTAL 458,203 $
BEGINNING AVAILABLE CASH - TOTAL 186,412
TOTAL REVENUES MINUS EXPENDITURES FOR MONTH (69,305)$ *
ENDING CASH BALANCE - FUND 15 (Operating Cash)227,595 $
ENDING TEXPOOL BALANCE - FUND 15 (Operating Investments)-$
ENDING TEXPOOL BALANCE - FUND 19 (Unspent bond proceeds)29,920 $
ENDING CASH BALANCE - FUND 95 (Required reserves)121,141 $
ENDING CASH BALANCE - TOTAL 378,656 $
UNAVAILABLE CASH - EARMARKED
COMMITTED TO BUILDING ONE RENOVATION 121,000 $
2010 $2.0M BOND SALE REMAINING CASH (Unspent bond proceeds)29,920 $
RESERVES FOR LEVERAGE NOTE (Required reserves)121,141 $
TOTAL UNAVAILABLE CASH 272,061 $
AVAILABLE CASH 106,595 $
*Due to prior period adjustments, beginning cash balance plus monthly income will not always be an exact match for ending cash balance
3 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
COMBINED EDC4B FUNDS SUMMARY
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
CATEGORY YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 313,866 $ 313,866 $ 134,784 $ 302,131 $
AD VALOREM TAXES 2,360 2,360 35,000 - - 100.0%0.0%35,000
SALES/BEVERAGE TAXES 119,221 361,319 373,835 31,672 145,142 33.0%38.8%228,693
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 305 790 65 444 1,811 38.6%2785.6%(1,746)
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 50,992 76,716 45,120 493 23,996 66.5%53.2%21,124
SURPLUS SALES/RENTALS 47,991 82,071 121,858 11,952 391,459 58.5%321.2%(269,601)
TRANSFERS - - 29,719 - - 0.0%0.0%-
TOTAL REVENUES 220,869 $ 523,257 $ 605,597 $ 44,563 $ 562,407 $ 42.2%92.9%13,471 $
SUPPLIES - - 2,100 - - #DIV/0!0.0%2,100
MAINTENANCE 9,278 44,464 25,112 4,821 93,259 20.9%371.4%(68,147)
SUNDRY 91,716 201,042 213,667 10,152 74,960 45.6%35.1%138,707
DEBT 56,869 169,431 169,777 9,632 60,892 33.6%35.9%108,885
TRANSFERS 34,909 154,819 182,307 - 33,794 22.5%18.5%148,513
CAPITAL 1,274 14,621 - 89,262 111,262 8.7%#DIV/0!(111,262)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 194,045 $ 584,377 $ 592,963 $ 113,867 $ 374,167 $ 33.2%63.1%218,796 $
REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 26,824 $ (61,120)$ 12,634 $ (69,305)$ 188,240 $
ENDING FUND BALANCE 340,690 $ 252,746 $ 147,418 $ 490,371 $
FUND BALANCE AS % OF EXP 175.6%43.3%24.9%0.0%131.1%
RESERVE ($115,000) REQUIREMENT)-$ -$ 115,000 $ -$ -$
RESERVE SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL)340,690 $ 252,746 $ 32,418 $ -$ 490,371 $
4 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
15: EDC4B FUND
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
CATEGORY YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 164,460 $ 164,460 $ (15,517)$ 152,017 $
AD VALOREM TAXES 2,360 2,360 35,000 - - 100.0%0.0%35,000
SALES/BEVERAGE TAXES 119,221 361,319 373,835 31,672 145,142 33.0%38.8%228,693
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 68 82 65 301 1,119 83.3%1721.0%(1,054)
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 50,992 76,716 45,120 493 23,996 66.5%53.2%21,124
SURPLUS SALES/RENTALS 47,991 82,071 121,858 11,952 391,459 58.5%321.2%(269,601)
TOTAL REVENUES 220,633 $ 522,549 $ 575,878 $ 44,419 $ 561,715 $ 42.2%97.5%14,163 $
SUPPLIES - - 2,100 - - #DIV/0!0.0%2,100
MAINTENANCE 9,278 44,464 25,112 4,821 93,259 20.9%371.4%(68,147)
SUNDRY 91,716 201,042 213,667 10,152 74,960 45.6%35.1%138,707
DEBT 56,869 169,431 169,777 9,632 60,892 33.6%35.9%108,885
TRANSFERS 34,909 154,819 152,588 - 33,794 22.5%22.1%118,794
CAPITAL 1,274 14,621 - 89,262 111,262 8.7%#DIV/0!(111,262)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 194,045 $ 584,377 $ 563,244 $ 113,867 $ 374,167 $ 33.2%66.4%189,077 $
REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 26,587 $ (61,828)$ 12,634 $ (69,449)$ 187,548 $
ENDING FUND BALANCE 191,047 $ 152,017 $ (2,883)$ 339,565 $
FUND BALANCE AS % OF EXP 98.5%26.0%-0.5%0.0%90.8%
RESERVE (NO REQUIREMENT)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
RESERVE SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL)191,047 $ 152,017 $ (2,883)$ -$ 339,565 $
5 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
15: EDC4B FUND
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
4002-00-00 MMD TAX-CURRENT YEAR 2,360 2,360 35,000 - - 100.0%0.0%35,000
AD VALOREM TAXES 2,360 $ 2,360 $ 35,000 $ -$ -$ 100.0%0.0%35,000 $
4081-00-00 SALES TAX 119,221 361,319 373,835 31,672 145,142 33.0%38.8%228,693
SALES/BEVERAGE TAXES 119,221 $ 361,319 $ 373,835 $ 31,672 $ 145,142 $ 33.0%38.8%228,693 $
4401-00-00 INVESTMENT INCOME 68 82 65 301 1,119 83.3%1721.0%(1,054)
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 68 $ 82 $ 65 $ 301 $ 1,119 $ 83.3%1721.0%(1,054)$
4409-00-00 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 50,992 76,716 45,120 493 23,996 66.5%53.2%21,124
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 50,992 $ 76,716 $ 45,120 $ 493 $ 23,996 $ 66.5%53.2%21,124 $
4805-00-00 RENTAL FEES-SHOPPING CENTER 47,630 81,710 121,112 11,952 42,280 58.3%34.9%78,832
4806-00-00 RENTAL INSURANCE 361 361 746 - - 100.0%0.0%746
4884-00-01 SALE OF ASSETS - - - - 349,179 #DIV/0!#DIV/0!(349,179)
SURPLUS SALES/RENTALS 47,991 $ 82,071 $ 121,858 $ 11,952 $ 391,459 $ #DIV/0!#DIV/0!(269,601)$
TOTAL REVENUES 220,633 $ 522,549 $ 575,878 $ 44,419 $ 561,715 $ 42.2%97.5%14,163 $
TOTAL REVENUES (EXCLUDING INTEREST/TRANSFERS)220,564 $ 522,467 $ 575,813 $ 44,118 $ 560,596 $
10% ADMIN CHARGE-GENERAL FUND 22,056 52,247 57,581 4,412 56,060
6 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
15: EDC4B FUND
01: ADMINISTRATION
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
5240-01-00 PRINTED SUPPLIES - - 2,000 - - #DIV/0!0.0%2,000
5260-01-00 GENERAL OFFICE SUPPLIES - - 50 - - 0.0%0.0%50
5261-01-00 POSTAGE - - 50 - - 0.0%0.0%50
SUPPLIES -$ -$ 2,100 $ -$ -$ #DIV/0!0.0%2,100 $
5501-01-00 ADVERTISING - 390 1,200 - - 0.0%0.0%1,200
5510-01-00 ASSOC DUES/PUBLICATIONS - 4,855 5,320 - - 0.0%0.0%5,320
5512-01-00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES -
5525-01-00 TRAINING/SEMINARS - 175 250 - - 0.0%0.0%250
5565-01-00 LEGAL SERVICES 5,750 17,252 10,000 - 4,200 33.3%42.0%5,800
5567-01-00 AUDIT SERVICES 2,250 2,250 2,250 - 2,250 100.0%100.0%-
5570-01-00 SPECIAL SERVICES 39,745 81,145 68,650 - 5,700 49.0%8.3%62,950
5574-01-00 FILING FEES 40 40 - -
5578-01-00 TRAVEL - - 100 - - 0.0%0.0%100
5580-01-00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1,903 2,128 - - - 89.4%#DIV/0!-
5595-01-00 ADMIN CHARGE-GENERAL FUND 22,056 44,926 81,647 6,804 40,823 49.1%50.0%40,824
5615-01-00 FUNCTIONAL GRANT 4,278 17,137 24,000 2,248 7,660 25.0%31.9%16,340
SUNDRY 76,061 $ 170,298 $ 193,417 $ 9,052 $ 60,633 $ 44.7%31.3%132,784 $
5800-01-00 LAND 1,274 1,968 - - 22,000 64.7%0.0%(22,000)
5813-01-00 KENNEDALE ENTRANCE SIGN - - - - - 0.0%0.0%-
5820-01-00 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT - - - - - 0.0%0.0%-
5875-01-00 CONSTRUCTION - - - - - 0.0%0.0%-
CAPITAL 1,274 $ 1,968 $ -$ -$ 22,000 $ 64.7%#DIV/0!(22,000)$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 77,335 $ 172,266 $ 195,517 $ 9,052 $ 82,633 $ 44.9%42.3%112,884 $
7 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
15: EDC4B FUND
01: ADMINISTRATION
03: DEBT SERVICE
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY BUDGET % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
5643-01-03 2007 $1.2M TAX BOND-INTEREST 29,325 58,689 54,905 - 27,378 50.0%49.9%27,527
5644-01-03 2007 $1.2M TAX BOND-PRINCIPAL - 55,000 60,000 - - 0.0%0.0%60,000
5645-01-03 2011 $1.7M TX LEVERAGE-INT 8,276 15,879 14,278 3,106 10,090 52.1%70.7%4,188
5646-01-03 2011 $1.7M TX LEVERAGE-PRI 19,268 39,863 40,594 6,526 23,424 48.3%57.7%17,170
DEBT 56,869 $ 169,431 $ 169,777 $ 9,632 $ 60,892 $ 33.6%35.9%108,885 $
5702-01-03 TRANSFER OUT-DEBT SERVICE FUND 34,909 154,819 152,588 - 33,794 22.5%22.1%118,794
TRANSFER 34,909 $ 154,819 $ 152,588 $ -$ 33,794 $ 22.5%22.1%118,794 $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 91,778 $ 324,250 $ 322,365 $ 9,632 $ 94,686 $ 28.3%29.4%227,679 $
8 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
15: EDC4B FUND
02: TOWN SHOPPING CENTER
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
5403-02-00 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9,278 44,464 25,112 4,821 93,259 20.9%371.4%(68,147)
MAINTENANCE 9,278 $ 44,464 $ 25,112 $ 4,821 $ 93,259 $ 20.9%371.4%(68,147)$
5530-02-00 ELECTRIC SERVICES 2,917 5,924 6,700 600 2,846 49.2%42.5%3,854
5545-02-00 INSURANCE-PROPERTY 6,507 6,507 6,500 - 8,341 100.0%128.3%(1,841)
5570-02-00 SPECIAL SERVICES 6,230 18,312 7,050 500 3,141 34.0%44.5%3,909
SUNDRY 15,654 $ 30,744 $ 20,250 $ 1,100 $ 14,327 $ 50.9%70.8%5,923 $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 24,932 $ 75,209 $ 45,362 $ 5,921 $ 107,586 $ 33.2%237.2%(62,224)$
9 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
15: EDC4B FUND
03: TOWN CENTER REDEVELOPMENT
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
5580-03-00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - 2,573 - - - 0.0%#DIV/0!-
5847-03-00 CONSTRUCTION - 10,080 - 89,262 89,262 0.0%#DIV/0!(89,262)
CAPITAL -$ 12,653 $ -$ 89,262 $ 89,262 $ 0.0%#DIV/0!(89,262)$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$ 12,653 $ -$ 89,262 $ 89,262 $ 0.0%#DIV/0!(89,262)$
10 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
15: EDC4B FUND
04: TEXAS LEVERAGE PROGRAM
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
5800-04-00 LAND - - - - - #DIV/0!0.0%-
CAPITAL -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ #DIV/0!0.0%-$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ #DIV/0!0.0%-$
11 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
19: EDC4B CAPITAL BOND FUND
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
CATEGORY YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 29,444 $ 29,444 $ 29,719 $ 29,649 $
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 73 205 - 38 186 35.4%#DIV/0!(186)
TOTAL REVENUES 73 $ 205 $ -$ 38 $ 186 $ 35.4%#DIV/0!(186)$
TRANSFERS - - 29,719 - - 0.0%0.0%-
CAPITAL - - - - - 0.0%0.0%-
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$ -$ 29,719 $ -$ -$ 0.0%0.0%-$
REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 73 $ 205 $ (29,719)$ 38 $ 186 $
ENDING FUND BALANCE 29,517 $ 29,649 $ 0 $ 29,835 $
FUND BALANCE AS % OF EXP N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RESERVE (NO REQUIREMENT)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
RESERVE SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL)29,517 $ 29,649 $ 0 $ -$ 29,835 $
12 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
19: EDC4B CAPITAL BOND FUND
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
4401-00-00 INVESTMENT INCOME 73 205 - 38 186 35.4%#DIV/0!(186)
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 73 $ 205 $ -$ 38 $ 186 $ 35.4%#DIV/0!(186)$
TOTAL REVENUES 73 $ 205 $ -$ 38 $ 186 $ 35.4%#DIV/0!(186)$
19: EDC4B CAPITAL BOND FUND
01: TOWN CENTER REDEVELOPMENT
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
5580-01-00 TRANSFER OUT - - - - - 0.0%0.0%-
TRANSFERS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0%0.0%-$
5800-01-00 LAND - - - - - 0.0%0.0%-
5847-01-00 CONSTRUCTION - - - - - 0.0%0.0%-
CAPITAL -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0%0.0%-$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0%0.0%-$
13 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
95: EDC4B RESERVE FUND
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY ACTUAL % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
CATEGORY YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 119,962 $ 119,962 $ 120,582 $ 120,464 $
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 164 502 - 105 506 32.6%#DIV/0!(506)
TOTAL REVENUES 164 $ 502 $ -$ 105 $ 506 $ 32.6%#DIV/0!(506)$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0%0.0%-$
REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES 164 $ 502 $ -$ 105 $ 506 $
ENDING FUND BALANCE 120,126 $ 120,464 $ 120,582 $ 120,971 $
FUND BALANCE AS % OF EXP N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RESERVE ($112,606 REQUIREMENT)112,606 $ 112,606 $ 112,606 $ 112,606 $ 112,606 $
RESERVE SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL)7,520 $ 7,858 $ 7,976 $ (112,606)$ 8,365 $
14 CITY OF KENNEDALE
ANNUAL PROGRAM OF SERVICES
March 2018
"YOU'RE HERE. YOUR HOME."
95: EDC4B RESERVE FUND
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY BUDGET % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
4401-00-00 INVESTMENT INCOME 164 502 - 105 506 32.6%#DIV/0!(506)
INVESTMENT EARNINGS 164 $ 502 $ -$ 105 $ 506 $ 32.6%#DIV/0!(506)$
TOTAL REVENUES 164 $ 502 $ -$ 105 $ 506 $ 32.6%#DIV/0!(506)$
95: EDC4B RESERVE FUND
FY16-17 FY16-17 FY17-18 CURRENT FY17-18 % OF PY BUDGET % OF CY BUDGET BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NAME YTD ACTUAL ADOPTED MONTH YTD USED USED REMAINING
TRANSFERS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0%0.0%-$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.0%0.0%-$
Year October November December January February March April May June July August September Total
FY2018 34,607 $ 38,169 $ 28,985 $ 31,808 $ 54,501 $ 31,672 $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 73,247 $
FY2017 29,583 $ 38,719 $ 27,285 $ 29,652 $ 35,265 $ 26,215 $ 29,043 $ 33,374 $ 26,747 $ 33,648 $ 16,530 $ 28,850 $ 118,303 $
FY2016 31,046 $ 39,712 $ 32,662 $ 25,293 $ 38,669 $ 29,196 $ 26,505 $ 38,181 $ 27,906 $ 28,195 $ 29,231 $ 30,459 $ 125,685 $
FY2015 23,985 $ 31,479 $ 27,515 $ 24,594 $ 35,857 $ 24,104 $ 27,064 $ 39,783 $ 42,821 $ 55,252 $ 48,766 $ 59,232 $ 146,818 $
FY2014 21,990 $ 29,867 $ 31,661 $ 22,458 $ 32,594 $ 23,228 $ 26,412 $ 31,319 $ 25,832 $ 23,976 $ 28,866 $ 22,659 $ 106,954 $
FY2013 33,617 $ 31,297 $ 23,446 $ 20,135 $ 30,003 $ 20,791 $ 20,318 $ 32,020 $ 21,136 $ 22,435 $ 27,973 $ 26,025 $ 103,066 $
FY2012 31,540 $ 37,196 $ 38,349 $ 29,926 $ 30,992 $ 24,484 $ 37,230 $ 41,230 $ 24,369 $ 40,830 $ 26,679 $ 27,612 $ 130,146 $
*Net payment after correcting an audit error.-$
Industry Amount % Change Adjusted Chang YTD FYTD
Wholesale 7,072 $ 67.86%31.38%22,559 $ 41,598 $
Retail 6,464 $ 14.20%-1.98%25,184 $ 47,887 $
General Services 5,403 $ 5.15%36.42%23,194 $ 49,174 $
Professional Services 4,961 $ -4.35%3.89%15,732 $ 32,070 $
Manufacturing 4,829 $ 123.82%-40.80%22,865 $ 28,203 $
Food 2,836 $ 32.39%-10.44%8,595 $ 16,847 $
Miscellaneous 72 $ 18.56%65.38%178 $ 440 $
Agricultural 45 $ -12.48%0.00%157 $ 3,397 $
Accomodation -$ -100.00%0.00%-$ -$
Sales Tax By Month
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
October November December January February March April May June July August September
Sales Tax vs Expectation
FY 2018
Five Year Average
Page 1 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | MARCH 19, 2018
KENNEDALE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING | March 19, 2018
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 405 MUNICIPAL DRIVE
WORK SESSION - 5:30 PM | REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brian Johnson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
I I. WORK SESSION
A. Presentation of the FY2017 annual audit – Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
Paula Lowe , a partner in t he Governmental Audit Division at Pattillo, Brown & Hill o utlined
the external audit process, the results of the audit, and some of the financial highlights of the
CAFR . S he sta ted, that t he City continues to receive a clean/unmodified opinion – the
highest opinion , and that the a ccompanying financial statements were audited in
accordance with both governmental a nd generally accepted auditing standards. She a dded
that the General Fund , when looking at the snapshot as of September 30, 2017, had
a pproximately four mon ths of operating expenses in reserve – i n keeping with industry best
practice s (of three months). She s ta t ed that this was the first year that the Stormwater
Drainage Fund was p resented separately from the Water Fund , and that , begin ning on page
56 , there w a s ten -year trend i nformation . She concluded by stating that staff was able to
answer all questions asked by the auditors and made r equested information available .
In response to Councilmember Sandra Lee ’s question, Lowe stated that the auditors o line -
by -line t o e n sure that bank r econciliations balance and t hat expenditure classifications are
properly applied. Councilmember R o ckie Gilley requested that Finance Director Brady
Olsen (who was not present at the meeting) provide Council with further explanation of t he
$500,000 adjustment to the Stormwater balance , noted in the staff report as resulting from
a n accounting adjustment in which Construction in Pro gress a ssets w ould no longer be
included in the carry -over balance . In response to Mayor Pro Tem Jan Joplin q uestion about
the Unassigned F u nd Balance, Lowe responded that those funds were available to be spent
at Council ’s discretion .
B. Discussion of seeking an RFP to conduct another Comprehensive Audit of all City Funds
Councilmember Sandra Lee stated that she was , in fact, proposing a forensic audit because
she had concerns about the figures in the EDC ’s report s to the State Comptroller not
match ing t he numbers in the EDC audit. City Manager George Campbell stated that the
Comptroller numbers were typically submitted by the F i nance Director , and that he would
like for staff to have time to understand Council ’s c oncerns and to research the situation
before e ngaging a firm for additional auditing. Mayor Pro Tem Joplin p roposed that this item
be c arried forward to the Work Session o f the April Regular Meeting for further discussion.
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 2 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | MARCH 19, 2018
C. Discussion of proposed capital improvement projects and related Certificate of Obligation
(CO) issuance
City Manager George Campbell stated that t he projects listed in the staff report are t hose
that were p resented during FY18 Budget discussions . H e added that th is debt had not yet
been issued and , therefore , none of the related projects had been undertaken. He asked for
Council ’s direction on issuance of the debt , noting that it might be premature to begin some
of the listed projects , in light of the ongoing discussions with the City of Arlington regarding
the water and wastewater system. He a lso noted that , during budget discussions, he sensed
hesitance on the part of Council to issue this debt , but that it was his understanding that any
project begun during the next three fiscal years could be f inanced with this CO . There was
some discussion about processes for i nforming residents about the potential bond issuance
a s well as the timing of projects , i ncluding the repair or replacement of wastewater lines .
City Manager Campbell stated that staff would prepare and present an updated project list .
D. Discuss scheduling of monthly City Council Regular Meetings and Work Sessions
Mayor Brian Johnson stated that there had been some discussion about moving Regula r
Meetings to Thursdays , while still r eceiving the packet on Friday, giving C ouncil more time
to e valuate the packet and s ubmit questions t o staff . Councilmember Turner suggested that
Council wait until after the May election to make this decision, a s there w ould be new
Councilmembers. Mayor Pro Tem Joplin asked if paper copies of the packet c ould be
delivered by Police officers. City Man a ger Campbell noted that p art of t he intention of
b udgeting for iPads was to try to move towards a paperless operation . Council came to a
consensus to p ostpone any decision on this item until new C o uncil members were s e ated ,
and City Manager Campbell r equested tha t Council try to s ubmit questions to staff
beforehand so that d e partment heads could be more fully prepared to answer questions .
E. Discussion of potential amendments to the Economic Development Corporation (EDC)
Bylaws
C ouncilmember Lee stated that she believed that C o uncilmembers should be allowed to
attend EDC Executive Sessions, but that such request s ha s been denied by EDC Board
President R o bert M undy . City Manager Campbell stated that he understood the City
Attorney ’s opinion to be that members of Council could attend advisory board Executive
Sessions but that , for practical reasons, i t was not a standard or recommended practice .
Councilmember Lee then requested that the EDC have a separate bank account . City
Manager Campbell stated that , internally, e ach fund was accounted for separately , despite
the monies b eing in a consolidated external bank account. He added that he could bring
back to Council, at a future date, information about the implications – financial and
otherwise – of establishing a separate external bank account for the EDC.
F. Discussion of request to pay invoice for outside legal counsel engaged by Mayor Pro Tem
Joplin
Mayor Pro Tem Joplin stated that the Charter a ffords the City Council the l atitude to seek
outside counsel , and that she w as presenting for payment an invoice in the amount of
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 3 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | MARCH 19, 2018
$3,289.3 6 from a ttorney Kelly Jones . S he distributed to t hose at the dais a timeline of recent
attempts by herself and Councilmember s Gilley and Lee to call a special meeting , w hich led
her to seek this additional l egal opinion . Mayor Johnson stated that he felt Mayor Pro Tem
Joplin had misinterpreted the Charter, which all owed the City Council as a body to engage
outside counsel, but did not give individual Councilmembers that right. After some
dis cussion, Mayor Pro Tem Joplin stated that she would absorb the cost personally and was
p leased t hat C o uncil was c onsidering adoption of a formal policy f or requesting that item s be
added to the agenda and scheduling special s essions .
G. Discussion of items on Regular Session
There was no discussion at this time. Council recessed at 6:55 p.m., until the Regular
Session.
III. REGULAR SESSION
Mayor Brian Johnson called the Regular Session to order at 7:07 p .m.
IV. ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Johnson ; Mayor Pro Tem Joplin, Place 5; Rockie Gilley, Place 1; Liz
Carrington, Pla ce 2; Sandra Lee, Place 3; and Kelly Turner, Place 4. Absent: None
Staff: City Manager George Campbell, City Secretary and Communications Coordinator Leslie Galloway, Deputy City
Secretary Kathryn Roberson, Fire Chief Mike McMurray, Police Chief Tommy Williams, Police Captain Darrell Hull,
Public Works Superintendent Larry Hoover, Library Director Amanda King, City Attorney D rew Larkin (TOASE)
V. INVOCATION
Mayor Pro Tem Jan Joplin delivered the invocation.
VI. UNITED STATES PLEDGE AND TEXAS PLEDGE
VII. VISITOR/CITIZENS FORUM
Loree Boyd , 321 W 3 rd Street , stated that she understood that money had been donated to
r epair the fountain in TownCenter Park , but it h ad not yet been completed. City Manager
Campbell responded that h is understanding w a s that the parts were ordered , that a local
contractor h ad offered h is labor a t no cost , and t he work s hould be c omplete d in April .
Joel Box , 1222 Peggy L ane , stated that d ue to a lack of curbs, gutters, and storm drains,
h is neighborhood had drainage problems and asked that t he situation be evaluated by staff .
Modesso Shaikh , 800 Shady Bend Drive , stated that she was d isturbed that Eric Elam had
posted a photo of h er husband and t heir home o n social media claiming that the City had
assisted them in a n improper manner during a property line dispute .
A. Presentation by One Safe Place
F elipe Gutierrez, Director of Develop ment a nd Engagement , stated that One Safe Place
a ims to prevent crime t hrough their support of C rime S toppers , the F amily J ustice C enter
M odel, and C i ty of Fort Worth bike patrol . He thank ed the C ity for supporting effort s to send
y outh who have witnessed domestic violence to C amp H ope . He added that Mayor Brian
Johnson and Burleson Mayor Ken Shetter raised nearly $10 ,000 for th i s p urpose, and
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 4 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | MARCH 19, 2018
r ecognized Mayor Johnson and Councilmember Sandra Lee for their personal contributions.
VIII. REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Updates from the City Council
Councilmember Rockie Gilley stated that he attended a Brookstone HOA meeting .
Councilmember Sandra Lee stated that , a s a member of the board of the
McDonald South e ast YMCA , she was w orking on securing summer transportation
for economically disadvantaged youth .
Mayor Pro Tem Jan Joplin stated that she attended t he grand opening of a
shipping container warehouse company ; and she a ppreciated the Parks Department
having a dd e d the n eighborhood park by the F ire S tation t o their m aintenance route .
Councilmember Kelly Turner stated that he attended a Regional Emergency
Preparedness Advisory Council (REPAC ) meeting , where reports f rom fire and
police r esponses and that there would soon be more money and agents in the region
to address these events.
B. Updates from the City Manager
City Manager George Campbell intr oduced new e mployees H uman Resources and EDC
Manager Danielle Clarke and Deputy City Secretary to Kathryn Roberson .
C. Updates from the Mayor
Mayor Johnson stated that he a ttended a Tarrant Regional Transportation Council (TRTC )
m eeting , including discussion o f high speed rail and eminent domain issues. He added that
he is now on a committee with the Mayor’s Council to e valuate regional transportation and
that he met with the Trinity Metro (formerly The T) t o discuss the possibility of e xpress bus
service from Kennedale to the downtown Fort Worth I ntermodal T ransportation Center and
that they were also looking into the V i a r ideshare program , offered by the City of Arlington.
M ayor Johnson read a p roclamation in recognition of Kids to Parks Day (Saturday, May 19,
2018). The City ’s associated event is KIDFISH from 9:00 a.m. to noon at Sonora Park.
IX. MONITORING INFORMATION
A. Monthly Financials – February 2018
B. Monthly EDC Financials and Activity Report
X. INCIDENTAL ITEMS
XI. REQUIRED APPROVAL ITEMS (CONSENT)
A. Consid er approval of minutes from February 15, 2018 regular meeting
B. Consider approval of minutes from March 5, 2018 special meeting
C. Consider approval of Ordinance 641, approving a tariff authorizing an annual Rate Review
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 5 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | MARCH 19, 2018
Mechanism (“RRM”) as a substitution for the annual interim rate adjustment process defined
by section 104.301 of the Texas Utilities Code, and as negotiated between Atmos Energy
and the Steering Committee of Cities Served by Atmos
D. Consider approval of purchase of a John Deere 4M tractor through the HGACBuy program
for the Streets & Parks Department
Motion To A pprove C onsent Agenda . Action Approve, Moved By Turner, Seconded By
Lee . Motion passed Unanim ously.
XII. DECISION ITEMS
A. Discuss and consider acceptance of independent auditor's report (Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR)) for the fiscal year ended Septem ber 30, 2017
Paula Lowe o f Patillo, Brown & Hill presented a brief overview of the CAFR , n oting that it
was presented with an unmodified opinion, that the F Y16 CAFR received a Government
Finance Officers Association (GFOA ) Certificate of Achieveme nt for Excellence in Financial
Reporting , and t hat i t was anticipated that the FY17 CAFR w ould as well.
Council a greed to postpone acceptance of the CAFR.
B. Conduct a Public Hearing to consider authorizing funding participation with Tarrant County
Community Development and Housing for the 44th Year Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Project for water line improvements on Danny Drive
1. Staff Presentation
Public Works Superintendent Larry Hoover stated that the purpose of th i s pu blic hearing
was to identi fy a CDBG projec t, which must be in a n area where the majority of h omes are
low/moderate income , and that s taff recommend s water line r eplacement on Danny Drive .
There was some discussion by Backflow Customer S ervice Inspector (CSI) Dennis Brown
r egarding the asbestos pipes currently in u se and the process for replacing those lines.
2. Public Hearing
No one signed up to speak at the Public Hearing.
3. Staff Response and Summary
There was no discussion at this time.
Motion To A pprove funding participation with Tarrant County Community Development and
Housing for the 44th Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Project for water
line improvements on Danny Drive . Action Approve, Moved By Turner, Seconded By
C arrington . Motion passed Unanim ously.
C. Consider approval of Resolution 521 authorizing funding participation with Tarrant County
Community Development and Housing for the 44th Year Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Project for water line improvements on Danny Drive
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 6 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | MARCH 19, 2018
There was no discussion at this time .
Motion To Approve Resolution 521 authorizing funding participation with Tarrant County
Community Development and Housing for the 44th Year Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Project for water line improvements on Danny Drive . Action Approve,
Moved By Turner, Seconded By C arrington . Motion passed Unanim ously.
D. Consider appointment of Chair and Vice Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission
M ayor Johnson stated that the P&Z Commission recommend e d Chris Pugh f or Chair and
Lary Adkins f or Vice C hair.
Motion To Approve appointment of Chris Pugh as Chair and Lary Adkins as Vice Chair of
the Planning & Zoning Commission . Action Approve, Moved By G illey , Seconded By L ee .
Motion passed Unanim ously.
E. Consider adoption of Resolution 519, adopting a policy for the calling of Regular and
Special Meetings of the City Council and for the placement of items on the Council's
Regular Agenda
There was no discussion at this time.
M otion To Approve Resolution 519, adopting a policy for the calling of Regular and Special
Meetings of the City Council and for the placement of items on the Council's Regular
Agenda . Action Approve, Moved By G illey , Seconded By M ayor P r o Tem Joplin . Motion
passed 3 -2 , with Carrington and Turner voting against .
Mayor J o hnson recessed into Executive Session at 7:54 p.m.
XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Eric Elam v. Leslie Galloway (City of Kennedale); Cause # SC9342
XIV. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SES SION, AND TAKE ACTION NECESSARY PURSUANT TO
EXECUTIVE SESSION, IF NEEDED
XV. ADJOURNMENT
M otion To A djourn . Action A d journ , Moved By C arrington , Seconded By Turner . Motion
passed u nanimously .
Mayor J o hnson adjourned the meeting at 8:07 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
BRIAN JOHNSON, MAYOR LESLIE GALLOWAY, CITY SECRETARY
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
KENNEDALE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING | April 16, 2018
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 405 MUNICIPAL DRIVE
WORK SESSION - 5:30 PM | REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Brian Johnson called the meeting to order at 5:3 6 p.m.
II. WORK SESSION
A. Discussion of possible capital improvement projects and related Certificate of Obligation
(CO) issuance
Public Works Superintendent Larry Hoover stated that the staff report lists those projects
that were discussed during budget meetings as items to be potentially funded with a
Certificate of Obligation (CO) Bond issuance. He added that staff, along with Shield
Engineering, had since scored all potential projects (except tho se that could be affected by
the ongoing negotiations with the City of Arlington ) and ranked them using the priority matrix
developed and adopted by the Utility & Infrastructure Board (UIB). He then introduced Craig
Barnes of Shield Engineer ing , who stated that el even projects receiving the top five ranking
scores would be presented tonight :
Project Name [MATRIX SCORE ]
12" Waterline S of I -20 (Gilman Rd and Bolen Rd) [59 ]
TxDOT EMP (Equivalent -Match Project ): Averett Road and Valley Lane [51 ]
Add 10"/6" lines in Basin B -2 [51 ]
12" Waterline S of I -20 and along BU 287 [50 ]
Danny Drive Water Improvements (CDBG) [50 ]
Timberline Drive Sewer Improvements [50 ]
Crestview Drive Sewer Improvements [50 ]
Mistletoe Drive Sewer Improvements [50 ]
Add 10" line in Basin B -2 [49 ]
Danny Drive Pavement Improvements (by County) [49 ]
Valley Lane [48 ]
Eden (Mansfield Cardinal to BU 287) [48 ]
Following the presentation, Larry Hoover stated that the 3 rd Street and Beacon Hill drainage
projects were ready for construction but funding had not yet been identified. After s ome
discussion about the cost and timing of these projects, City Manager George Campbell
stated that these projects would be important to keep in mind during the upcoming budget
process. He also suggested that the UIB review the projects further and bring t heir
recommendation s to Council as, going forward, he would like to see the UIB evaluate
anything water - or wastewater -related – giving the examples of the CIP (Capital
Improvement Plan) projects currently being discussed and the utility rate structure.
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 2 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | APRIL 16 , 2018
Campbell stated that he now understood that Council’s direction was for staff to begin the
bidding process for t he 3 rd Street (first priority) a nd Beacon Hill (second priority) drainage
projects , if cash funding c ould be identified . Brady Olsen noted that there were more than $2
Million in water and sewer projects, regardless of a ny contract w ith the City of Arlington.
B. Discuss issuing of a request for proposal (RFP) for a forensic audit of the EDC Fund and/or
the General Fund
Following discussion among Councilmembers and staff as to the normal scope of the
customary Comprehensive A n nual F i nancial Report (CAFR) for both the City and the
Economic Development Corporation (EDC ) and about budgetary issues in the past, the
Council determined that the staff would begin drafting a proposed scope of service that
might then be published as an RFP for additional audit services in t he near future.
C. Update regarding nominations for a Charter Committee
After a brief discussion, Council chose to delay further decisions until the newly -elected
Councilmembers in Places 2 and 4 were sworn in so that their input could be received.
D. Discussion of employee compensation
C ity Manager Campbell stated that staff had not received the salary and climate surveys for
the Police and Fire Departments , but that there are issues of below -market -compensation in
all departments of the Cit y . He adde d that this would be good data t o shape the budget
process for FY19, but that if Council d esired to make adjustments before that time, i t would
become a funding issue and would create possible inequities across departments.
E. Discussion of the process to be used for the City Manager's annual performance review
C i ty Manager Campbell stated that there had not yet been a discussion for the process or
mechanism o f his annual performance review , and that he was now seeking direction.
Councilmember Kelly T u rner expressed his concern with evaluating the City Manager based
on expectations that – because of the change in Council makeup during his first year – he
was not necessarily made expressly aware of beforehand . M ayor Pro Tem Joplin stated
that , as Campbell is subject to International City/County Management Association (ICMA )
Code of Ethics , t h a t might be a good starting point . Mayor Brian Johnson stated that he
understood that it was Council ’s desire that the ICMA review document be distributed to all
C o uncilmembers so that they could review it for s uitability .
F. Discussion of Water Fund performance to date and the projected effects of potential rate
adjustments
Finance Director Brady Olsen stated that the packet includes a line item review of the Water
Fund through March and that revenues are on track to hit the budgeted number of about
$2.4 million for FY 18. He added that staff expected to have the rate recom mendations from
the Texas Rural Water Association (TRWA) by the next meeting. In response to Mayor Pro
Tem Jan Joplin’s questions regarding the effects of her proposed water and wastewater rate
reduction, Olsen confirmed that the reduction in revenues woul d be about $250,000, and
that the reserve policy for this fund was 18 to 25% of the annual expenditures. Joplin stated
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 3 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | APRIL 16 , 2018
that there was a request to have an action item to adopt updated rates. City Manager
George Campbell stated that staff did not currently ha ve the necessary information to draft a
rate ordinance. Mayor Johnson stated that he felt that a more transparent method for rate
adjustments was to have a citizen committee, recommendations from the UIB and staff, and
public hearings before voting on a rate -setting ordinance.
G. Discussion of items on Regular Session
There was no discussion at this time. Mayor Johnson recessed at 7:34 p.m.
III. REGULAR SESSION
Mayor Brian J o hnson called the Regular Session to order at 7:46 p.m.
IV. ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Johnson; Mayor Pro Tem Joplin, Place 5; Rockie Gilley, Place 1;Sandra Lee,
Place 3; and Kelly Turner, Place 4. Absent: Liz Carrington, Place 2
Staff: City Manager George Campbell, City Secretary and Communications Coordinator Leslie Galloway, Finance Director
Brady Olsen, Fire Chief Mike McMurray, Police Chief Tommy Williams, Police Captain Darrell Hull, Public Works
Superintendent Larry Hoover, Backflow Customer Service Inspector (CSI) Dennis Brown, Streets & Parks Crew Chief Ron
Taylor, Library Director Amanda King, HR/EDC Manager Danielle Clarke, City Attorney Wayne Olson (TOASE)
V. INVOCATION
Mayor Pro Tem Jan Joplin delivered the invocation.
VI. UNITED STATES PLEDGE AND TEXAS PLEDGE
VII. VISITOR/CITIZENS FORUM
Frank Mor r i s , 5300 Independence Avenue, Arlington, stated his concern with the
enforcement of building codes in the Glen of Village Creek subdivision.
Lana Sather , 421 Corry A. Edwards, asked that the noise ordinance be evaluated and
updated to further restrict and better define the hours and dis tances within .
Hollis Matthews , 1252 Elmbrook Drive, stated his concern with the spending of the
Economic Development C o rporation (EDC).
Perry Clemnti , 908 Creekside Court, declined to speak.
Kelli Rod , 945 Little School Road, stated her thanks and admiration for Councilmembers
Turner and Carrington for their decade of service to the City.
VIII. REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
A. Updates from the City Council
Councilmember Rockie Gilley stated his appreciation for staff quickly and professionally
addressing a customer ’s utility issue in the Oakcrest neighborhood. He also thanked Public
Works Director Larry Ledbetter for his service to the City of Kennedale.
Councilmember Sandra Lee stated that she attended a n event in the Vineyards , and
stated that they were havi ng some issues with the pond in the neighborhood.
Mayor P r o Tem Jan Joplin also acknowledged the water department ’s work to address the
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 4 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | APRIL 16 , 2018
utility issue in Oakcrest. She also stated that in order to make good decisions, Council
needs good information , and that she was frustrated with the $500,000 adjustment to the
Stormwater F u nd . She added that the reason that Council voted against a S t ormwater Fee
increase was because she felt the fund was more robust at that time.
B. Updates from the City Manager
George Campbell stated that the materials for the T o wnCenter fountain repair were with the
contractor, but that scheduling had not been finalized yet.
C. Updates from the Mayor
• Recognition of Dr. Liz Carrington's and Kelly Turner's years of service to the City of
Kennedale as Councilmembers
• Proclamation presentation in recognition of April as Child Abuse Prevention Month
Mayor Johnson stated that he attended a meeting about the new Via transportation program
in Arlin gton, which would offer rides for $3.00 ; and a meeting regarding the high speed rail
project and toll r oads or “managed lanes ”. He i nvited everyone t o the inaugural performance
of the Theatre in the Park Progra m – Music Man at 7:30 p.m. on April 27 and 28.
Mayor Johnson thanked Councilmember Kelly Turner for his decade of service to the City of
Kennedale, noting his service on several regional committees including the North Central
Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Em ergency Preparedness Committee .
Councilmember T u rner stated that he was proud of the accomplis hments during his t ime as
a C o uncilmember , including the expansion of S o nora Park and the addition of TownCenter
and Roger s Farm Parks ; the expansion of Little and Sublett roads, including sidewalks and
landscape medians; the landscaping and sidewalks along Kenneda le Parkway, which was
largely grant -funded; the expan sion of the sales tax revenues thro ugh the development of
T o wnCenter and Oakcrest; and the addition of four significant neighborhoods .
He added that he felt all C o uncil and Board member s should be c ommended for their
willingness to v olunteer , as it is o ften a highly -criticized role ; that he felt social media was an
improper forum for policy discussio n; that development should be planned by a singular
adopted community vision; that leadership s hould capitalize on the opportunities t he City ’s
location affords us ; that decisions s hould focus on the overall financial health of the City
rather than the interests of specific groups ; and that , overall, Councils must look at what ’s
best for the population of the City as a whole – b oth now, a nd for the next 20 -plus years.
Turner stated that he had two regrets: the under -compensation of staff and the h esitance to
increase water rates increme ntally as they needed to be, resulting in the large rate increase
in 201 6 . He finalized by thanking staff, those who had served alongside him, and his family .
IX. MONITORING INFORMATION
A. Monthly Financials – March 2018
There was no discussion at this time.
B. Monthly EDC Financials and Activity Report
There was no discussion at this time.
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 5 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | APRIL 16 , 2018
X. INCIDENTAL ITEMS
XI. REQUIRED APPROVAL ITEMS (CONSENT)
A. Consider approval of minutes from March 19, 2018 regular meeting
B. Consider adopting Resolution 522, waiving the local matching funds on the New Hope Road
Bridge Project, and applying those funds, instead, to other local approved structures
C. Consider approval Resolution 523 to deny the Distribution Cost Recover Factor (“DCRF”)
application by Oncor Electric Delivery LLC
D. Discuss and consider acceptance of independent auditor's report (Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report (CAFR)) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017
Item A was removed at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Joplin as she had not review ed them.
Item D was removed at the request of Councilmember G i lle y as he d esired corrections to
the CAFR transmittal letter and one correction to the audit numbers themselves.
Motion To A pprove Consent Agenda , except items A and D . Action Approve, Moved By
M ayor P r o Tem Joplin , Seconded By Lee . Motion passed Unanimously.
Motion To Postpone acceptance of the CAFR until the next Regular Meeting on May 21.
Action P ostpone , Moved By Gilley , Seconded By M ayor P r o Tem Joplin . Motion passed
Unanimously.
XII. DECISION ITEMS
A. Consider approval of TownCenter Municipal Complex and Park landscaping contract with
Weldon’s Lawn and Tree LLC, in the amount of $23,040, annually
Public Works Superintendent Larry Hoover stated that six bids were received and that staff
recommended Weldon ’s . Councilmember Lee n oted that each of the three years were being
billed at the same cost , despite “year one ” of the contract b eing less than six months.
Motion To A pprove the TownCenter Municipal Complex and Park landscaping contract with
Weldon’s Lawn and Tree LLC . Action A pprove , Moved By M ayor P r o Tem Joplin ,
Seconded By L ee . Motion passed Unanimously.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Joplin ’s question regarding a progress update on the Water
Rate Study from the TRWA (Texas Rural Water Association ), F i nance Director Brady Olsen
stated that staff expected to receive the report by the next Regular Meeting on May 21.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Joplin ’s question regarding the v iolation of the requirements
of a resolution, City Attorney Wayne Olson stated that by failing to a dd specific action items
t o t he agenda after the request was made by at least two Counc ilmembers was, in his
opinion, not following the intent of the resolution, but that there was no p enalty a ttached .
Mayor Pro Tem Joplin r eminded everyone of the Keep Kennedale Beautiful Cleanup (KKB)
on Saturday, April 21 . Mayor Johnson reminded everyone to vote in the May 5 election.
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 6 of 6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES | APRIL 16 , 2018
XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Council did not c onvene into Executive Session.
XIV. RECONVENE INTO OPEN SESSION, AND TAKE ACTION NECESSARY PURSUANT TO
EXECUTIVE SESSION, IF NEEDED
XV. ADJOURNMENT
Motion To Adjourn . Action Adjourn , Moved By Mayor Pro Tem Joplin, Seconded By L ee .
Motion passed unanimously.
Mayor Johnson adjourned the meeting at 8:47 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
BRIAN JOHNSON, MAYOR LESLIE GALLOWAY, CITY SECRETARY
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 1 of 1
KENNEDALE CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING | April 23, 2018
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 405 MUNICIPAL DRIVE
WORK SESSION - 5:30 PM | REGULAR SESSION - 4:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
M ayor P r o Tem Jan Joplin called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
II. ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Pro Tem Joplin, Place 5; Rockie Gilley, Place 1; Sandra Lee, Place 3 .
Absent: Mayor Johnson; Liz Carrington, Place 2 ; Kelly T u rner, Place 4 .
Staff: City Manager George Campbell, City Secretary and Communications Coordinator Leslie Galloway, Finance
Director Brady Olsen, Public Works Superintendent Larry Hoover, HR/EDC Manager Danielle Clarke
III. WORK SESSION
A. Discussion of the Unassigned Fund Balance
In response to Councilmember Lee ’s question about the $1.5 m illion that is designated as
u nassigned in the audit , Finance Director Brady Olsen stated that “unassigned ” indicat e d
that those funds are not set aside by ordinance or law for a specific purpose, but that those
monies are used to maintain the adopted Fund Balance Policy of 18 to 25% of the annual
expenditures, and the refore, it was not advisable to draw down that balance . He added that
staff projects that the General Fund would end FY19 at around 19%, w hich i s r oughly
$340,000 below the 25% goal.
In response to C o uncilmember Gilley ’s question about the TIRZ/TIF Fund, Olsen stated that
th e fund was e xperiencing revenue growth and that, in coming years, would hopefully be
able to pay itself back. In response to Gilley ’s question about the Tree Reforestation Fund,
Olsen stated that he had not identified a use for th e se restricted monies in the current
budget , but that he would further research the options during the FY19 b udget process.
In response to Councilmember Gilley ’s question regarding staff ’s understanding of Council ’s
direction for the FY19 Budget, City Manager Campbell stated that he understood that
Council preferred to maintain the same or a lower tax rate.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
Motion To Adjourn . Action A djourn , Moved By Lee , Seconded By M ayor Pro Tem Joplin .
Motion passed unanimously .
Mayor Pro Tem Joplin adjourned the meeting at 4 :2 2 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
BRIAN JOHNSON, MAYOR LESLIE GALLOWAY, CITY SECRETARY
DR
A
F
T
UN
T
I
L
AP
P
R
O
V
E
D
BY
CO
U
N
C
I
L
Page 1 of 2
O642 CITY OF KENNEDALE, TX 2017
ORDINANCE NO. 642
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KENNEDALE, TEXAS,
APPOINTING THE JUDGE AND ASSOCIATE JUDGES OF THE
MUNICIPAL COURT OF RECORD IN THE CITY OF KENNEDALE;
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF
ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS , the City of Kennedale, Texas, is a home rule city acting under its
charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas
Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS , the City Council has created a municipal court of record, pursuant to
Chapter 30 of the Texas Government Code; and
WHEREAS , Chapter 30 of the Texas Government Code relating to municipal
courts of record provides that the judge of the municipal court of record shall be
appointed by the City Council by ordinance; and
WHEREAS , the workload of the Kennedale Municipal Court is not large enough
to support a full time Municipal Court Judge; and
WHEREAS , it is of great benefit to the City of Kennedale to have an experienced
municipal court judge sit on the bench of the City of Kennedale municipal court; and
WHEREAS, Section 574.001, Texas Government Code requires that a finding be
made to the effect that a person who serves as an officer in more than one appointed
position obtain a finding from the governing body that such officer has satisfied Article
XVI, Section 40 of the Texas Constitution; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF KENNEDALE, TEXAS, THAT:
SECTION 1. It is hereby found that the office of municipal court judge of the City
of Kennedale is of benefit to the State of Texas and to the City of Kennedale and that
there is no conflict between the office of municipal court judge of Kennedale and the
office of municipal judge in any other City.
SECTION 2. William “Bill” Lane is hereby reappointed as the Municipal Judge of
the municipal court of record in the City of Kennedale, Texas, for a two-year term
beginning May 21, 2018. At the expiratio n of said term in accordance with Article 16,
Section 17 of the Texas Constitution Judge Lane shall continue to serve until his
successor shall be duly qualified.
Page 2 of 2
O642 CITY OF KENNEDALE, TX 2017
SECTION 3. Craig Magnuson and Erin Bakker are hereby appointed as the
associate judges to serve when the Municipal Judge is temporarily absent or unable to
serve.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the
City of Kennedale and shall not repeal any of the provision of such ordinances except in
those instances when provisions of such ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance in which the event the conflicting provisions of such
ordinances are hereby repealed.
SECTION 5. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the
phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance are severable
and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be
declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent
jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases,
clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance, since the same would
have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any
such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
DULY PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF KENNEDALE, TEXAS, ON THE 21 st DAY OF MAY, 2018.
APPROVED:
______________________________
MAYOR, BRIAN JOHNSON
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY SECRETARY, LESLIE GALLOWAY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
______________________________
CITY ATTORNEY, WAYNE OLSON
1
Kelly Shriver
From:Alex Garcia
Sent:Wednesday, April 13, 2016 4:41 PM
To:'Bob Hart (bhart@cityofkennedale.com)'
Subject:RE: New Hope Road Contract Amendment #1
Bob,
Under the hydraulic analysis section of the scope, I mistakenly left in item #2 but removed it from the hours. This item is
not anticipated for this project, so if you are agreeable, I would like to strike that item from the scope of services.
Alex Garcia, PE, PTOE
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
4055 International Plaza, Suite 200
Fort Worth, TX 76109 ‐4895
Direct: (817) 735 ‐7321
Blog: http://www.freese.com/onward ‐upward
From: Alex Garcia
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 4:59 PM
To: 'Bob Hart (bhart@cityofkennedale.com)' <bhart@cityofkennedale.com>
Cc: Mazen Kawasmi <Mazen.Kawasmi@freese.com>; Brian Coltharp <BCC@freese.com>; Chris Bosco <CB@freese.com>
Subject: New Hope Road Contract Amendment #1
Bob,
Attached you will find our contract amendment for New Hope Road. We are proposing to take the southern ‐most 3000
feet of the project limits from the schematic design to a 90% design level. This will include roadway design, hydraulic
analysis and design, design survey and subsurface utility engineering. I have included the following documents detailing
out the anticipated work:
Contract Change Authorization Form
Scope of Services
Detailed Cost Breakdown
Form 1295
Please review and let me know if you have any questions regarding this proposal. We appreciate the opportunity on this
project and look forward to continuing our partnership with Kennedale.
Have a great weekend!
Alex Garcia, PE, PTOE
Freese and Nichols, Inc.
4055 International Plaza, Suite 200
Fort Worth, TX 76109 ‐4895
Direct: (817) 735 ‐7321
Blog: http://www.freese.com/onward ‐upward
Page 1 of 3
New Hope Road
Scope of Services – Contract Amendment #1
Description
As one of the bridge class culverts was selected for funding as part of the TxDOT off -system bridge
replacement program, this design contract will move the design forward on the southern -most 3,000
linear feet (beginning at the transition to Hudson Village Creek Road) of New Hope Road from the
current schematic level design to a 90% level design. This effort will include roadway design, hydraulic
analysis and detailed design survey and property acquisition documents . The two creek crossings are
anticipated to be culvert designs as shown in the previous hydraulic memo with a pedestrian underpass
adjacent to the northern culvert. Construction plans and specifications package are not included at this
time as the timetable to construction and the contracting met hod are uncertain at this time.
Roadway Design
1. FNI will visit the site up to three (3) times during the design process to confirm design elements.
2. FNI will utilize design survey to review and confirm the roadway geometry. Significant change to
the roadway alignment from the schematic design may be an additional service.
3. FNI will utilize the topographic survey to revise the roadway profile. As the profile for the
schematic was based on 1’ contour data, profile revisions may be necessary for this design and
this effort is assumed as part of this scope.
4. FNI will prepare the geometric design for retaining walls associated with the roadway which may
be necessary. This will be a civil plan/profile layout only and will not include geotechnical or
structural design at this time which would be included in the final design for construction plans.
5. FNI will prepare grading layouts detailing grading work to be performed near the culverts and
adjacent to the roadway in order to finalize property easements required for the project.
6. FNI will prepare the storm drain design for the roadway. This will include developing
contributing drainage areas, determining inlet spacing and sizing, determining storm drain pipe
layout, profile and sizing. Lateral profiles are not to be inclu ded with this package and may be
included for the final design.
7. FNI will prepare a striping layout plan for the roadway and connecting roadways.
8. FNI will review available and surveyed utility data to determine potential utility conflicts. FNI will
contact franchise utility companies (from a list provided by City) to share the plans with the
project with them and receive feedback from the utility companies.
9. FNI will submit 60% design drawings which will include all of the elements listed in items 2 -4 and
6 a bove.
10. FNI will submit 90% design drawings to include addressing of any comments provided at the
60% level plus items 5 & 7 listed above.
11. FNI will attend up to six (6) coordination meetings including meetings with the City, meetings
with TxDOT, design revi ew meetings, franchise utilities or property owners.
Services not included in roadway design:
1. Geotechnical design – including wall design and pavement design
Page 2 of 3
2. Traffic control plans
3. Erosion control plans
4. Structural design for walls
5. Bridge design (as drainage crossings are anticipated to remain as culverts)
6. Right -of -way agent or appraisal services
7. All services listed in original contract not specifically included in this amendment
Hydraulic Analysis
1. FNI will perform data collection and a field visit to confirm best available data is being used for
the analysis. This may include data requests to FEMA or the City of Kennedale.
2. FNI will perform regression equation analysis of the watersheds contributing to the two
crossings to determine an existing conditi ons discharge if required by TXDOT.
3. FNI will develop a cross section layout for the HEC -RAS model based on the design alignment.
4. Existing Conditions HEC -RAS model will be developed for the two crossings based on the prior
modeling efforts performed by FNI for New Hope Road reflecting the revised cross section
layout and any newly available topographic survey.
5. FNI will evaluate one selected design configuration for each of the two crossings of either a
bridge, box culvert, or arch pipe to determine the geometry required to meet the design
objectives and criteria.
6. A scour analysis will be performed if a bridge design or open bottom pipe design is pursued at
either crossing. Scour mitigation measures will be evaluated and incorporated into the design.
7. A H ydraulic Report will be prepared for submission to TXDOT addressing the design and
hydraulic considerations outlined in the TXDOT Hydraulic Design Manual. Hydraulic data sheets
will be developed for the two crossings and incorporated in the construction p lans. Up to 5
copies of the report will be provided.
Assumptions:
1. The models developed previously by FNI based on models developed by Halff Associates will be
the basis of the design models.
2. The hydraulic structures will be sized to meet the City of Kenne dale hydraulic criteria , but results
will be provided for TXDOT criteria.
3. It is understood a FEMA map change is contemplated for the watershed at some point in the
future. It is assumed the Special Flood Hazard Area in the project vicinity is not revised during
the design and no floodway modeling is necessary. Revisions to modeling based on revised
floodplain models is an additional service. P reparation and submittal of Letter of Map Revision
or Conditional L etter of Map Revision to FEMA is an additional service.
Survey
1. Prepare property mapping for 500’ south of Hudson Village Creek Road (not previously included
in scope)
2. Prepare topographic survey for project area as identified in description above, including
identification of all surface elements.
3. Prep are and send right of entry letters for up to 17 affected properties
4. Prepare 6 right -of -way acquisition documents
Page 3 of 3
5. Prepare 8 permanent easement documents
6. Temporary easement documents are not included, if required they will be an additional service.
Su bsurfa ce Utility Engineering (SUE)
1. Provide level B SUE services. Level B includes horizontal location of existing utilities, including
services, along the 3,000 linear feet of the project limits as detailed in the description above.
The limits include Right of W ay to Right to Way and the properties to be acquired. The Level “B”
w ill include overhead utilities.
2. Level A SUE services will be considered an additional service. Level A is defined as excavation of
test holes that are in potential conflict with the prop osed work.
Schedule
FNI will provide 60% design plans 12 weeks after notice to proceed
FNI will provide 90% design plans 8 weeks after design review meeting
07/16
\\freese.com \fniinc2 \Resources \OLCR \K \Kennedale \Valley Lane & Averett Rd Repairs \PRIME AGREEMENT.docx \
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
STATE OF TEXAS §
COUNTY OF TARRANT §
This Agreement is entered into by the City of Kennedale , hereinafter called “City ” and Freese and Nichols, Inc.,
hereinafter called “FNI .” In consideration of the Agreement s herein, the parties agree as follows:
I. EMPLOYMENT OF FNI: In accordance with the terms of this Agreement : City agrees to employ FNI; FNI
agrees to perform professional services in connection with the Project; City agrees to pay to FNI
compensation. Th e Project is described as follows: Structural Repairs to B ridges at Averett Road and Valley
Lane.
II. SCOPE OF SERVICES: FNI shall render professional services in connection with Project as set forth in
Attachment SC - Scope of Services and Responsibilities of City which is attached to and made a part of this
Agreement .
III. COMPENSATION: City agrees to pay FNI for all professional services rendered under this Agreement .
FNI shall perform professional services as outlined in the “Scope of Services ” for a lump sum fee of $37,524 .
If FNI ’s services are delayed or suspended by City , or if FNI ’s services are extended for more than 60 days
through no fault of FNI, FNI shall be entitled to equitable adjustment of rates and amounts of compensation
to refl ect reasonable costs incurred by FNI in connection with such delay or suspension and reactivation and
the fact that the time for performance under this Agreement has been revised.
IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT : The Terms and Conditions of Agreement as set forth as
Attachment TC shall govern the relationship between the City and FNI.
Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this Agreement to anyone other
than City and FN I, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole
and exclusive benefit of City and FNI and not for the benefit of any other party.
This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between City and FNI and su persedes all prior written or oral
understandings.
This contract is executed in two counterparts.
IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, they have executed this Agreement , the _____ day of , 2 0 17 .
ATTEST: City of Kennedale
(City )
By:
Print Name and Title
ATTEST: Freese and Nichols, Inc.
(FNI)
By:
John F . Dewar, P.E., S.E., Principal & Vice -President
ATTACHMENT SC
FNI______
SC -1 CITY ______
SCOPE OF SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY
ARTICLE I
BASIC SERVICES: FNI shall render the following professional services to the City of Kennedale for Design,
Bid, and Construction Phase Services for Repair of the Averett Road and Valley Lane bridges. This work shall
consist of spall repairs and guardrail installation along the Valley Lane Bridge and approaches, and minor
str eam stabilization to protect bridge piers and mill and overlay of Averett Road in vicinity of the creek
crossing.
DESIGN PHASE : FNI shall provide professional services in this phase as follows:
Attend and facilitate initial design review meeting with City and design team.
Prepare drawings, specifications, Construction Contract Documents, designs, and layouts of
improvements to be constructed (surveys to be furnished as Additional Services, pursuant to
Article II).
Conduct Environmental Review
a. Task 1. Gather and Review Existing Information . FNI will compile readily available existing
information and prepare maps of the proposed project site in preparation for the site visit. The
types of information that will be gathered will include, but is not limi ted to, U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) 7.5 -minute topographic maps, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
soils maps, as well as recent and historical aerial photographs of the site.
b. Task 2. Conduct Pedestrian Survey. FNI will conduct a site visit to make observations of
existing environmental conditions and identify types and locations of potential waters of the
U.S. This task does not include conducting detailed wetland delineations necessary for the
preparation and submittal of a PCN to the USACE.
c. Task 3. Prepare Technical Memorandum . Based on our understanding of the proposed
project, it appears that the bridge rehabilitation project could be designed to meet the terms
and conditions of NWP 14 without requiring no tification to the USACE. Information gathered
during the site visit will be used to prepare a draft technical memorandum. The memorandum
will include discussions of methodologies used, the hydrologic characterization and locations
of potential waters of t he U.S., and an opinion on their jurisdictional status. This memorandum
will also include a discussion of how the proposed project would meet the terms and conditions
of NWP 14 without requiring notification to the USACE. The draft technical memorandum
w ill be submitted to the City for review and comment. After incorporating City’s comments
into the document, FNI will submit a final technical memorandum to the City.
Attend and facilitate 9 0% design review meeting with City and design team.
Prepare bidder ’s proposal forms (project quantities) of the improvements to be constructed.
Upon final approval by City , FNI will provide City two (2) sets of "Final" drawings and
specifications.
BID OR NEGOTIATION PHASE. Upon completion of the design services and app roval of "Final"
drawings and specifications by City , FNI will proceed with the performance of services in this phase
as follows:
A ssist City by responding to questions and interpreting bid documents. Prepare and issue addenda
to the bid documents to plan holders if necessary.
Prepare bid tabulation and letter of recommendation upon receipt of bids.
ATTACHMENT SC
FNI______
SC -2 CITY ______
Furnish contractor copies of the drawings and specifications for construction pursuant to the
General Conditions of the Construction Contract.
D. CONSTRUCTION PHASE : Upon completion of the bid or negotiation phase services, FNI will
proceed with the performance of construction phase services as described below. FNI will endeavor
to protect City in providing these services however, it is understood that FNI doe s not guarantee the
Contractor ’s performance, nor is FNI responsible for supervision of the Contractor ’s operation and
employees. FNI shall not be responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures
of construction selected by the Cont ractor, or any safety precautions and programs relating in any way
to the condition of the premises, the work of the Contractor or any Subcontractor. FNI shall not be
responsible for the acts or omissions of any person (except its own employees or agents) at the Project
site or otherwise performing any of the work of the Project.
These services are based on the use of FNI standard General Conditions for construction projects.
Modifications to these services required by use of other general conditions or contract administration
procedures are an additional service. If general conditions other than FNI standards are used, the City
agrees to include provisions in the construction contract documents that will require the construction
contractor to include FN I and their subconsultants on this project to be listed as an additional insured
on contractor ’s insurance policies.
1. Assist City in conducting pre -construction conference(s) with the Contractor(s), review
construction schedules prepared by the Contractor(s) pursuant to the requirements of the
construction contract, and prepare a proposed estimate of monthly cash requirements of the
Project from information provided by the Construction Contractor.
2. Establish and maintain a project documentation system consistent with the requirements of the
construction contract documents. Monitor the processing of contractor ’s submittals and provide
for filing and retrieval of project documentation. Produce monthly reports indicating the status
of all submittals in t he review process. Review contractor ’s submittals, including, requests for
information, modification requests, shop drawings, schedules, and other submittals in
accordance with the requirements of the construction contract documents for the projects.
Mon itor the progress of the contractor in sending and processing submittals to see that
documentation is being processed in accordance with schedules.
3. Based on FNI ’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and review of
the Payment Re quests and supporting documentation submitted by Contractor, determine the
amount that FNI recommends Contractor be paid on monthly and final estimates, pursuant to
the General Conditions of the Construction Contract.
4. Make two (2) visits appropriate to the stage of construction to the site (as distinguished from the
continuous services of a Resident Project Representative) to observe the progress and the quality
of work and to attempt to determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the
Construction Contract Documents. In this effort FNI will endeavor to protect the City against
defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractors and will report any observed deficiencies to
City . Visits to the site in excess of the specified number are an additional service.
5. Notify the contractor of non -conforming work observed on site visits. Review quality related
documents provided by the contractor such as test reports, equipment installation reports or other
documentation required by the Constructi on contract documents.
ATTACHMENT SC
FNI______
SC -3 CITY ______
6. Interpret the drawings and specifications for City and Contractor(s). Investigations, analyses,
and studies requested by the Contractor(s) and approved by City , for substitutions of equipment
and/or materials or deviations from the drawings and specifications is an additional service.
7. Prepare documentation for contract modifications required to implement modifications in the
design of the project. Receive and evaluate notices of contractor claims and make
recommendations to the City on the merit and value of the claim on the basis of information
submitted by the contractor or available in project documentation. Endeavor to negotiate a
settlement value with the Contractor on behalf of the City if appropriate. Providing these
service s to review or evaluate construction contractor(s) claim(s), supported by causes not within
the control of FNI are an additional service.
8. Conduct, in company with City ’s representative, a final review of the Project for conformance
with the design concept of the Project and general compliance with the Construction Contract
Documents. Prepare a list of deficiencies to be corrected by the contractor before
recommendation of final payment. Assist the City in obtaining legal releases, permits,
warranties, spa re parts, and keys from the contractor. Review and comment on the certificate of
completion and the recommendation for final payment to the Contractor(s). Visiting the site to
review completed work in excess of two trips are an additional service.
ARTIC LE II
ADDITIONAL SERVICES: Additional Services to be performed by FNI, if authorized by City , which are
not included in the above described basic services, are described as follows:
A. Field surveying required for the preparation of designs and drawings.
B. Field layouts or the furnishing of construction line and grade surveys.
C. GIS mapping services or assistance with these services.
D. Making property, boundary and right -of -way surveys, preparation of easement and deed descriptions,
including title search and examination of deed records.
E. Providing services to investigate existing conditions or facilities, or to make measured drawings
thereof, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished by City .
F. Providing renderings, model, and mock -ups requested by the City .
G. Making revisions to drawings, specifications or other documents when such revisions are 1) not
consistent with approvals or instructions previously given by City or 2) due to other causes not solely
within the control o f FNI.
H. Preparing applications and supporting documents for government grants, loans, or planning advances
and providing data for detailed applications.
I. Providing shop, mill, field or laboratory inspection of materials and equipment. Observe factory test s
of equipment at any site remote to the project or observing tests required as a result of equipment
failing the initial test.
ATTACHMENT SC
FNI______
SC -4 CITY ______
J. Preparing data and reports for assistance to City in preparation for hearings before regulatory agencies,
courts, arbitration p anels or any mediator, giving testimony, personally or by deposition, and
preparations therefore before any regulatory agency, court, arbitration panel or mediator.
K. Furnishing the services of a Resident Project Representative to act as City ’s on -site representative
during the Construction Phase. The Resident Project Representative will act as directed by FNI in
order to provide more extensive representation at the Project site during the Construction Phase.
Through more extensive on -site observat ions of the work in progress and field checks of materials and
equipment by the Resident Project Representative and assistants, FNI shall endeavor to provide further
protection for City against defects and deficiencies in the work. Furnishing the services of a Resident
Project Representative is subject to the provisions of Article I, D and Attachment RPR.
If City provides personnel to support the activities of the Resident Project Representative who is FNI
or FNI ’s agent or employee, the duties, responsib ilities and limitations of authority of such personnel
will be set forth in an Attachment attached to and made a part of this Agreement before the services
of such personnel are begun. It is understood and agreed that such personnel will work under the
di rection of and be responsible to the Resident Project Representative. City agrees that whenever FNI
informs him in writing that any such personnel provided by the City are, in his opinion, incompetent,
unfaithful or disorderly, such personnel shall be rep laced.
L. Furnish ing Special Inspections required under chapter 17 of the International Building Code. These
Special Inspections are often continuous, requiring an inspector dedicated to inspection of the
individual work item, and they are in additional to General Representation and Resident
Representation services noted elsewhere in the contract. These continuous inspection services can be
provided by FNI as an Additional Service.
M. Preparation of Conformed or “As Bid” plans and specifications for use durin g the construction phase.
These documents shall involve the incorporation of addenda items into the Contract Documents
through modification of the electronic files and reprinting of the plans and specifications inclusive of
the incorporated changes.
N. Assi sting City in preparing for, or appearing at litigation, mediation, arbitration, dispute review boards,
or other legal and/or administrative proceedings in the defense or prosecution of claims disputes with
Contractor(s).
O. Performing investigations, studie s and analyses of substitutions of equipment and/or materials or
deviations from the drawings and specifications.
P. Assisting City in the defense or prosecution of litigation in connection with or in addition to those
services contemplated by this Agreement . Such services, if any, shall be furnished by FNI on a fee
basis negotiated by the respective parties outside of and in addition to this Agreement .
Q. Performing investigations, studies, and analysis of work proposed by construction contractors to
correct defective work.
R. Design, contract modifications, studies or analysis required to comply with local, State, Federal or
other regulatory agencies that become effective after the date of this agreement.
S. Services required to resolve bid protests or to rebid the projects for any reason.
T. Visits to the site in excess of the number of trips included in Article I for periodic site visits,
coordination meetings, or contract completion activities.
ATTACHMENT SC
FNI______
SC -5 CITY ______
U. Any services required as a result of default of the contractor(s) o r the failure, for any reason, of the
contractor(s) to complete the work within the contract time.
V. Providing services after the completion of the construction phase not specifically listed in Article I.
W. Providing basic or additional services on an accele rated time schedule. The scope of this service
include cost for overtime wages of employees and consultants, inefficiencies in work sequence and
plotting or reproduction costs directly attributable to an accelerated time schedule directed by the City .
X. Pr oviding services made necessary because of unforeseen, concealed, or differing site conditions or
due to the presence of hazardous substances in any form.
Y. Providing services to review or evaluate construction contractor(s) claim(s), provided said claims a re
supported by causes not within the control of FNI.
Z. Providing value engineering studies or reviews of cost savings proposed by construction contractors
after bids have been submitted.
AA. Preparing statements for invoicing or other documentation for billin g other than for the standard
invoice for services attached to this professional services agreement.
BB. Provide follow -up professional services during Contractor ’s warranty period.
CC. Provide Geotechnical investigations, studies and reports.
DD. Additional Environmental Services
a. Preparation of a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for submittal to the USACE.
b. Coordination with the Texas Historical Commission.
c. Conducting an archeological survey along the proposed pipeline alignments.
d. Formal delineations of po tential waters of the U.S.
e. Preparation of a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination report.
f. Conduct a tree survey as per the Kennedale, Texas Code of Ordinances; Chapter 16
(Recreation and Cultural Activities ); Article VI (Natural Resource Management ).
g. Co nducting a functional or condition assessment (e.g., TXRAM) on waters of the U.S.
potentially impacted by the proposed project.
h. Preparation of an individual 404 permit application (IP).
i. Presence/absence surveys for federally listed threatened/endangered sp ecies.
j. Application for Texas Parks & Wildlife Department Sand and Gravel Permit.
k. Application for General Land Office Easement.
l. Consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act.
m. Other environmental services not specifically defined in this scope of services.
ATTACHMENT SC
FNI______
SC -6 CITY ______
ARTICLE III
TIME OF COMPLETION: FNI is authorized to commence work on the Project upon execution of this
Agreement and agrees to complete the services in accordance with the following schedule:
Pre -final plans (9 0%) – 8 weeks after notice -to -proceed
Final Plans (100%) – 8 weeks after review of 90% plans
If FNI ’s services are delayed through no fault of FNI, FNI shall be entitled to adjust contract schedule
consistent with the number of days of delay. These delays may include but are not limited to delays in City or
regulatory reviews, delays on the flow of info rmation to be provided to FNI, governmental approvals, etc.
These delays may result in an adjustment to compensation as outlined on the face of this Agreement.
ARTICLE IV
RESPONSIBILITIES OF City : City shall perfor m the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the
services of FNI:
A. City recognizes and expects that certain Change Orders may be required. Unless noted otherwise, the
City shall budget a minimum of 5% for new construction and a minimum of 10% for construction that
includes refurbishing existing structures.
Further, City recognizes and expects that certain Change Orders may be required to be issued as the
result in whole or part of imprecision, incompleteness, errors, omission, ambiguities, or inc onsistencies
in the Drawings, Specifications, and other design documentation furnished by Engineer or in the other
professional services performed or furnished by Engineer under this Agreement (“Covered Change
Orders”). Accordingly, City agrees to pay for Change Orders and otherwise to make no claim directly
or indirectly against Engineer on the basis of professional negligence, breach of contract, or otherwise
with respect to the costs of approved Covered Change Orders unless the aggregate costs of all su ch
approved Covered Change Orders exceed 2% for new construction and 4% for reconstruction. Any
responsibility of Engineer for the costs of Covered Changed Orders in excess of such percentage will
be determined on the basis of applicable contractual oblig ations and professional liability standards.
For purposes of this paragraph, the cost of Covered Change Orders will not include:
• any costs that City would have incurred if the Covered Change Order work had been included
originally in the Contract Documents and without any other error or omission of Engineer related
thereto,
• Any costs that are due to unforeseen site conditions, or
• Any costs that are du e to changes made by the City .
• Any costs that are due to the Contractor
Nothing in this provision creates a presumption that, or changes the professional liability standard for
determining if, Engineer is liable for the cost of Covered Change Orders in ex cess of the percent of
Construction Cost stated above or for any other Change Order. Wherever used in this document, the
term Engineer includes Engineer’s officers, directors, partners, employees, agents, and Engineers
Consultants .
B. Designate in writing a person to act as City ’s representative with respect to the services to be rendered
under this Agreement . Such person shall have contract authority to transmit instructions, receive
ATTACHMENT SC
FNI______
SC -7 CITY ______
information, interpret and define City ’s policies and decisions with resp ect to FNI ’s services for the
Project.
C. Provide all criteria and full information as to City ’s requirements for the Project, including design
objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and
expandability, and any b udgetary limitations; and furnish copies of all design and construction
standards which City will require to be included in the drawings and specifications.
D. Assist FNI by placing at FNI ’s disposal all available information pertinent to the Project includi ng
previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project.
E. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for FNI to enter upon public and private property as
required for FNI to perform services under this Agreement .
F. Examin e all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, specifications, proposals and other documents
presented by FNI, obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as City
deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisio ns pertaining thereto within a
reasonable time so as not to delay the services of FNI.
G. Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project
and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for completion of the Project.
H. City shall make or arrange to have made all subsurface investigations, including but not limited to
borings, test pits, soil resistivity surveys, and other subsurface explorations. City shall also make or
arrange to have made the interpretations of data and reports resulting from such investigations. All
costs associated with such investigations shall be paid by City .
I. Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance c ounseling services as may be
required for the Project, such legal services as City may require or FNI may reasonably request with
regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be raised by Contractor(s), such
auditing service as C ity may require to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the
moneys paid under the construction contract, and such inspection services as City may require to
ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule, regulation, ord inance, code or order
applicable to their furnishing and performing the work.
J. City shall determine, prior to receipt of construction bid, if FNI is to furnish Resident Project
Representative service so the Bidders can be informed.
K. If City designates a pe rson to serve in the capacity of Resident Project Representative who is not FNI
or FNI ’s agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such Resident
Project Representative(s) will be set forth in an Attachment attached to and made a part of this
Agreement before the Construction Phase of the Project begins. Said attachment shall also set forth
appropriate modifications of the Construction Phase services as defined in Attachment SC, Article I,
C, together with such adjustme nt of compensation as appropriate.
L. Attend the pre -bid conference, bid opening, preconstruction conferences, construction progress and
other job related meetings and substantial completion inspections and final payment inspections.
M. Give prompt written not ice to FNI whenever City observes or otherwise becomes aware of any
development that affects the scope or timing of FNI ’s services, or any defect or nonconformance of
the work of any Contractor.
ATTACHMENT SC
FNI______
SC -8 CITY ______
N. Furnish, or direct FNI to provide, Additional Services as st ipulated in Attachment SC, Article II of this
Agreement or other services as required.
O. Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Article IV.
ARTICLE V
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES : FNI and City designate the following representatives:
City ’s Designated Representativ e Larry Hoover
150 N Little School Rd.
Kennedale, TX 76060
817 -985 -2170 Office
817 -985 -2115 Fax
FNI’s Designated Representative Alex Garcia , PE
4055 International Plaza, Suit e 200
Fort Worth, TX 76109
817 -735 -7321 Office
aig@freese.com
FNI’s Accounting Representative Stephanie Kirchstein
4055 International Plaza, Suite 200
Fort Worth, TX 76109
214 -217 -2212 Office
Stephanie.kirchstein@freese.com
Page 1 of 2
FNI__________
CITY __________
12 -01 -16 ATTACHMENT TC
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT
1. DEFINITIONS: The term City as used herein refers to the City of Kennedale, Texas . The term FNI as used herein refers to
Freese and Nichols, Inc., its employees and agents; also its subcontracto rs and their employees and agents. As used herein,
Services refers to the professional services performed by Freese and Nichols pursuant to the AGREEMENT.
2. CHANGES: City , without invalidating the AGREEMENT, may order changes within the general scope of t he WORK
required by the AGREEMENT by altering, adding to and/or deducting from the WORK to be performed. If any change
under this clause causes an increase or decrease in FNI's cost of, or the time required for, the performance of any part of t he
Services under the AGREEMENT, an equitable adjustment will be made by mutual agreement and the AGREEMENT
modified in writing accordingly.
3. TERMINATION: The obligation to provide services under this AGREEMENT may be terminated by either party upon ten
days' writte n notice. In the event of termination, FNI will be paid for all services rendered and reimbursable expenses
incurred to the date of termination and, in addition, all reimbursable expenses directly attributable to termination.
4. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES: In n o event shall FNI or its subcontractors be liable in contract, tort, strict liability,
warranty, or otherwise for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages, such as loss of product, loss of use o f
the equipment or system, loss of anticipat ed profits or revenue, non -operation or increased expense of operation or other
equipment or systems.
5. INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CITY : City will assist FNI by placing at FNI's disposal all available information
pertinent to the Project including previous r eports and any other data relative to design or construction of the Project. FNI
shall have no liability for defects or negligence in the Services attributable to FNI's reliance upon or use of data, design
criteria, drawings, specifications or other infor mation furnished by City and City agrees to indemnify and hold FNI harmless
from any and all claims and judgments, and all losses, costs and expenses arising therefrom. FNI shall disclose to City , prior
to use thereof, defects or omissions in the data, de sign criteria, drawings, specifications or other information furnished by City
to FNI that FNI may reasonably discover in its review and inspection thereof.
6. INSURANCE: FNI shall provide to City certificates of insurance which shall contain the following minimum coverage:
Commercial General Liability Workers' Compensation
General Aggregate $2,000 ,000 Each Accident $1,000,000
Automobile Liability (Any Auto) Professional Liability
CSL $1,000 ,000 $3,000 ,000 Annual Aggregate
7. SUBCONTRACTS: If, for any reason, at any time during the progress of providing Services, City determines that any
subcontractor for FNI is incompetent or undesirable, City will notify FNI accordingly and FNI shall take immediate steps for
cancellation of such subcontract. Sub letting by subcontractors shall be subject to the same regulations. Nothing contained in
the AGREEMENT shall create any contractual relation between any subcontractor and City .
8. OWNER SHIP OF DOCUMENTS: All drawings, reports data and other project informa tion developed in the execution of
the Services provided under this AGREEMENT shall be the property of the City upon payment of FNI's fees for services.
FNI may retain copies for record purposes. City agrees such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by City or others. Any reuse by City or by those who obtained said documents from City without written verification or
adaptation by FNI will be at City 's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to FNI, or to FNI's inde pendent associates
or consultants, and City shall indemnify and hold harmless FNI and FNI's independent associates and consultants from all
claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such veri fication or
adaptation will entitle FNI to further reasonable compensation. FNI may reuse all drawings, report data and other project
information in the execution of the Services provided under this AGREEMENT in FNI's other activities. Any reuse by FNI
w ill be at FNI's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to City , and FNI shall indemnify and hold harmless City from
all claims, damages, losses and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom.
Page 2 of 2
FNI__________
CITY __________
9. POLLUTANTS AND HAZARDOUS WASTES: It is understood and agreed that FNI has neither created nor contributed
to the creation or existence of any hazardous, radioactive, toxic, irritant, pollutant, or otherwise dangerous substance or
condition at the site, if any, and its c ompensation hereunder is in no way commensurate with the potential risk of injury or
loss that may be caused by exposures to such substances or conditions. The parties agree that in performing the Services
required by this AGREEMENT, FNI does not take pos session or control of the subject site, but acts as an invitee in
performing the services, and is not therefore responsible for the existence of any pollutant present on or migrating from the
site. Further, FNI shall have no responsibility for any polluta nt during clean -up, transportation, storage or disposal activities.
10. OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS: FNI will furnish an opinion of probable project development cost based on present
day cost, but does not guarantee the accuracy of such estimates. Opinions of probable cost, financial evaluations, feasibility
studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions and utilitarian considerations of operations and maintenance costs prepared
by FNI hereunder will be made on the basis of FNI ’s experience and qualificatio ns and represent FNI's judgment as an
experienced and qualified design professional. It is recognized, however, that FNI does not have control over the cost of
labor, material, equipment or services furnished by others or over market conditions or contrac tors' methods of determining
their prices.
11. CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATION: If required by the AGREEMENT, FNI will furnish Construction
Representation according to the defined scope for these services. FNI will observe the progress and the quality of work t o
determine in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents. In performing these services, FNI
will endeavor to protect City against defects and deficiencies in the work of Contractors; FNI will report any observed
deficienc ies to City , however, it is understood that FNI does not guarantee the Contractor's performance, nor is FNI
responsible for the supervision of the Contractor's operation and employees. FNI shall not be responsible for the means,
methods, techniques, seque nces or procedures of construction selected by the Contractor, or the safety precautions and
programs incident to the work of the Contractor. FNI shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person (excep t
his own employees or agent) at the P roject site or otherwise performing any of the work of the Project. If City designates a
person to serve in the capacity of Resident Project Representative who is not a FNI's employee or FNI's agent, the duties,
responsibilities and limitations of authori ty of such Resident Project Representative(s) will be set forth in writing and made a
part of this AGREEMENT before the Construction Phase of the Project begins.
12. PAYMENT: Progress payments may be requested by FNI based on the amount of services completed . Payment for the
services of FNI shall be due and payable upon submission of a statement for services to CITY and in acceptance of the
services as satisfactory by the CITY . Statements for services shall not be submitted more frequently than monthly. An y
applicable new taxes imposed upon services, expenses, and charges by any governmental body after the execution of this
AGREEMENT will be added to FNI's compensation.
If CITY fails to make any payment due FNI for services and expenses within thirty (30) days after receipt of FNI's statement
for services therefore, the amounts due FNI will be increased at the rate of one percent (1%) per month from said thirtieth
(30th) day, and, in addition, FNI may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to CITY , su spend services under this
AGREEMENT until FNI has been paid in full, all amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
13. ARBITRATION: No arbitration arising out of, or relating to, this AGREEMENT involving one party to this
AGREEMENT may include the othe r party to this AGREEMENT without their approval.
14. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS: CITY and FNI each are hereby bound and the partners, successors, executors,
administrators and legal representatives of CITY and FNI are hereby bound to the other party to this AGREEMENT and to
the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in resp ect
of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this AGREEMENT.
Neither CITY nor FNI shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, moneys
that may become due or moneys that are due) this AGREEMENT without the written consent of the other, except to the
extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is ma ndated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law.
Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge t he
assignor from any duty or responsibility under this AG REEMENT. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent FNI
from employing such independent associates and consultants as FNI may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of
services hereunder.
15. PURCHASE ORDERS: If a Purchase Order is used to aut horize FNI's Services, only the terms, conditions/instructions
typed on the face of the Purchase Order shall apply to this AGREEMENT. Should there be any conflict between the
Purchase Order and the terms of this AGREEMENT, then this AGREEMENT shall prevai l and shall be determinative of the
conflict.
Page 1 of 2
R52 5 CITY OF KENNEDALE, TX 201 8
RESOLUTION NO. 52 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENNEDALE, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A
LOCAL PROJECT ADV ANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT (LPAFA) WITH
THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TxDOT) FOR
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT ON KENNEDALE/NEW HOPE ROAD; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Kennedale, Texas, (the “City”) is a home rule city acting
under its c harter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas
Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS , it is the intent of the City Council to protect the public health, safety
and welfare; and
WHEREAS , the City prepared and submitted to the State an application for
consideration under the Local Project Advance Funding Agreement (LPAFA) for the
project which is briefly described as bridge replacement on Kennedale/New Hope Road
at Village Creek Tributary (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS , the LPAFA is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF KENNEDALE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1. ORDER. The City Council hereby approves the Local Project
Advance Funding Agreement (LPAFA) between the City of Kennedale and the State of
Texas (through TxDOT) attached hereto as Exhibit “A” to provide for the development
and construction of the Project, and hereby authorizes the Mayor of the City of execute
the Local Project Advance Funding Agreement.
SECTION 2. NOTICE. Upon adoption of this Resolution, the City Secretary is
directed to give notice of this re solution as may be required by law.
SECTION 3. AUTHORIZATION OF NECESSARY ACTIONS . The Mayor, City
Administrator, and the City Secretary, in consultation with the City Attorney, are
authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to effectuate this Resolution.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. Thi s Resolution shall be effective upon its
adoption.
DULY PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENNEDALE
ON THE 2 1 ST DAY OF MAY , 2018.
APPROVED:
______________________________
Page 2 of 2
R52 5 CITY OF KENNEDALE, TX 201 8
MAYOR, BRIAN JOHNSON [CITY SEAL
ATTEST:
______________________________
CITY SECRETARY, LESLIE GALLOWAY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
______________________________
CITY ATTORNEY, WAYNE OLSON
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 1
Date: April 16, 2018
Agenda Item No: REGULAR ITEMS (B)
I. SUBJECT
CASE # PZ 18‐01 to conduct a public hearing, receive comments and consider app roval on a
request by Skorburg Retail Corp., for a Zoning change and Conce pt Plan for approximately
23.1 acres from "AG" Agricultural District to “PD” Planned Deve lopment District for a new
neighborhood consisting of 92 si ngle‐family lots on property lo cated at 1118 and 1132
Kennedale Sublett Road, legal description of Lots 4R1 & 3B1, JM Estes Home Tracts, Tarrant
County, Texas.
II. PREVIOUS ACTION
At the March 15, 2018 Planning a nd Zoning Commission regular me eting, the P&Z held a public hearing on Case
# PZ 18‐01 and tabled the decisio n on the zoning change and con cept plan request to a llow the applicant to
modify the concept plan based on adjoining property owner and P lanning and Zoning Commission input.
The applicant has modified the original concept plan from the p roposed 96 single‐family residential lots to 92
single‐family residential lots by changing some of the perimete r lots to the northern and the southern edges of
the development to 60’ wide lots (as opposed to the 50’ wide lo ts in the original proposal).
III. SUMMARY
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
Request Rezone from AG to PD for a Single‐Family residential neighborho od of
approximately 92 lots on 23 acres.
Applicant Rich Darragh (on behalf o f Skorburg Retail Corp.)
Location 1118 and 1132 Kennedale Sublett Ro ad (lots 4‐R & 5‐R, Kennedale
Addition, Tarrant County, Texas)
Surrounding Uses Primarily single family residential
Surrounding Zoning AG, R2, PD‐R3, PD‐109, R3, R1
Future Land Use Plan Designation Neighborhood and Neighborhood Corridor
Staff Recommendation Approve
SUMMARY OF CONCEPT PLAN AND PD REGULATIONS
The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Zoning Cha nge and Concept Plan from “AG” Agricultural Zoning
District to “PD” Planned Developm ent District. The applicant is requesting a PD designation which allows an
applicant to tailor development standards to a specific project subject to the approval standards in Chapter 9 of the
UDC.
Typically, Planned Development districts are proposed by develo pers if they subject property has unique
characteristics or geography tha t makes a standard residential zoning district inefficient or inflexible to address the
unique subdivision layout or de sign challenges. Development sta ndards for a specific PD district are proposed by an
applicant and reviewed against t he city’s standa rds for a PD an d approved by the P&Z and City Council if they meet
the intent, guidelines, and sta ndards in the City’s UDO and Com prehensive Plan.
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 2
SITE DATA SUMMARY
Existing Zoning “AG” Agricultural
Proposed Zoning “PD” Planned Development
Proposed Land Uses Single‐Family Residential
Gross Acreage 23.1 acres
Number of Residential Lots 92 lots
Gross Density 4.0 dwelling units/acre
Open Space Acreage 3.37 Acres
Open Space Percentage 14.5%
The following table provides a su mmary comparing the developmen t regulations for the R3 Zoning District and
proposed PD Regulations.
Spatial Requirements R‐3 Residential District Proposed PD Standards
Lot Type A Lot Type B
Lots
Min. Area (s.f.) 8,750 6,000 7,200
Min. Width (feet) 80 50 60
Min. Depth (feet) 100 120 120
Max. Impervious (%) 50 65 65
Setbacks
Min. Front (feet) Primary 30 20 20
Secondary 15 15 15
Min. Side (feet) Total 20
Least 8 5 5
Min. Rear (feet) 15 10 10
Principal Buildings
Max. Height (feet) 40 40 40
Max. Stories (number) 2.5 2.5 2.5
Min. GFA (s.f.) 1,250 1,800 1,800
Min. Masonry (%) 80 80 80
Accessory Buildings
Max. Number 1 1 1
Max. Size (% of rear yard) 10 10 10
Max. Height (feet) 15 15 15
Max. Stories (number) 1 1 1
Min. Side Street Setback (feet) ‐ ‐ ‐
Min. Side Setback (feet) 8 5 5
Min. Rear Setback (feet) 8 5 5
Min. Setback from Principal Bldg. (feet) 5 5 5
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 3
ACTION NEEDED
A. Conduct a Public Hearing
B. Consider approval of a zoni ng change and concept plan
ATTACHMENTS
A. Background Information
B. Staff Review
C. Location Map
D. Surrounding Property Owne rs Map and Responses
E. Public Notification
F. Proposed Concept Plan
G. Proposed PD Ordinance 640
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 4
III. ATTACHMENTS
A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The subject property is located just south of the roundabout at Kennedale Sublett Road and Wildcat Way. It is
composed of two currently undevel oped tracts and is designated in the City’s future land use plan for
neighborhoods. Current zoning of the property is AG Agricultura l District.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD
The subject property is surrounded by mostly residential uses. To the northeast along Kennedale Sublett Road is
the established neighborhood of Rolling Acres Addition (zoned P D 109). To the north is th e site of Covenant Life
Baptist Church (zoned PD‐R3. Imme diately to the west are large residential/agricultural properties (zoned AG) and
to the east, there is one large residential parcel and the neig hborhood along Peggy Lane (Glenn Oaks Addition)
(zoned R2). Immediately to the south is the neighborhood along Collette Sublett Road (Oliver Acres Subdivision)
(zoned a mix of AG, R1 and R3).
B. STAFF REVIEW
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The property is located in an area designated for Neighborhood and Neighborhood Corridor.
As mentioned above, the subjec t property at 1118 and 1132 Kenne dale Sublett Road consists of two tracts under
separate ownership. The entire area is designated as Neighborho od and Neighborhood Corridor along Kennedale
Sublett Road.
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 5
The comprehensive plan describes the Neighborhood and Neighborh ood Center designations as follows.
R ELATED GOALS FROM THE COMP REHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The proposed plan for the neighb orhood implements the key princ iples of the Comprehensive Plan that prioritizes
creating a Connected City and enabling Economic Prosperity.
Principle #1 Connected City: Traffic congestion, health, social engagement, and natural resources are all issues that
are impacted by a city’s level of connectivity. Having a well‐c onnected street system allows traffic to disperse so that
traffic is not forced to a few major arterials, resulting in co ngestion. Additionally, incorporating facilities to enable
walking and bicycling will provide our residents with opportuni ties to exercise, interact with one another, and
experience the surrounding nat ural and built environment.
Specifically, the proposed development connects Kennedale Suble tt Road to the south to Collette
Sublett Road and provides an important link in the city’s thoro ughfare network. This street is
designated as an Avenue in the Comprehensive Plan.
Principle #2 Economic Prosperity: Kennedale’s location as a fir st‐tier suburb in cl ose proximity to Fort Worth provides
opportunities for the city’s economy to flourish. In essence, t his principle is about making sure economic prosperity is
achievable for every resident, a s well as diversifying and expa nding Kennedale’s economy through sustainable
business growth.
Goal: Promote Access to Housing : The 1949 Housing Act promised a “decent home … for every American
family.” This necessitates providing housing options for people of varying financial means and residential
preferences including providing the regulatory framework and de veloper support for quality housing for
residents.
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 6
Specifically, the proposed development provides for a housing t ype that is not in abundance in
Kennedale. This includes quality homes on smaller than typical lots in Kennedale and organized in
a compact manner together with the provision of parks, open spa ce, and pedestrian amenities.
ADDITIONAL FACTORS TO CONSIDER: UDC REQUIREMENTS AND PD CONCEPT PLAN
UDC Chapter 9: The UDC Chapter 9 provides the following guideli nes and standards for consideration of PD zoning
districts in the city:
9.1 B Purpose. The PD rezoning process is provi ded as a design option to allow for one (1) or more of the
following:
1. Encourage innovation in land development in terms of variety, d esign, layout, and type of structures
constructed;
2. Promote the efficient use of land to facilitate a more economic arrangement of buildings, circulation
systems, land use, and utilities;
3. Encourage the adaptive re-use o f significant or historic bui ldings;
4. Provide the opportunity to mix c ompatible uses or residential t ypes;
5. Preserve and protect signifi cant natural features, open spac e, and cultural/historic resources;
6. Ensure that new development is consistent with the character of the community;
7. Promote efficient provision of public services and utilities ;
8. Minimize adverse traffic impacts and accommodate safe and effic ient pedestrian access and circulation;
9. Encourage development of conv enient recreational facilities; and
10. Encourage the use and impr ovement of land where site condit ions make development under
conventional zoning difficult or less desirable.
(items marked in green above indicate the goals that the prop osed development meets per staff’s review
and assessment.)
9.1 C. Design Flexibility. The PD process and standards provide for flexibility in design and permit variation of
the specific spatial requirement s on the basis of the total PD plan, subject to the approval of the PD by the City
Council in accordance with the requirements set forth in this a rticle. A PD shall not be sought primarily to avoid
the standards and requirements of other zoning districts.
In addition, the UDC also require s that PD districts provide at least four (4) of the following site design elements
that could not be attained thro ugh a conventional zoning distri cts:
1. Mixed-use development with re sidential and non-residential u ses, or a variety of housing types ;
2. Pedestrian/transit-oriented des ign with buildings oriented t o the sidewalk and parking to the side or rear
of the site;
3. High quality architectural design beyond the site plan requirem ents of this article;
4. Extensive landscaping beyond the site plan requirements of this article;
5. Preservation, enhancement, or restoration of natural resourc es (trees, slopes, wetland areas, views,
etc.);
6. Preservation or restoration of significant or historic resou rces;
7. Provision of open space or public plazas or features;
8. Efficient consolidation of poorly dimensioned parcels or proper ty with difficult site conditions (e.g.
topography, shape etc.);
9. Effective transition between h igher and lower density uses , and/or between nonresidential and
residential uses; or allowing incompatible adjacent land uses t o be developed in a manner that is not
possible using a conventional approach;
10. Shared vehicular and pedestr ian access between properties o r uses;
11. Mitigation to offset impacts on public facilities (such as street improvements); or
12. Significant use of sustainable building and site design fea tures such as: water u se reduction, water
efficient landscaping, innovative wastewater technologies, low impact stormwater management, optimize
energy performance, on-site rene wable energy, passive solar hea ting, reuse/recycled/renewable
materials, indoor air quality, or other elements identified as sustainable by establis hed groups such as
the US Green Building Council (L EED) or ANSI National Green Bui lding Standards.
(items marked in green above indicate the site design elements provided by the proposed development
meets per staff’s review and assessment.)
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 7
UDC Chapter 27: Chapter 27 of the UDC also provides procedures Planned Developments including requirements
for minimum spatial standards (b ased upon a base zoning distric t – R‐3), any variations to these minimal spatial
standards and justifications for the same, and a PD Concept Pla n.
Per 27.2.C, in review ing any variations to the standards in the base zoning districts, th e P&Z and City Council may
consider one or more of the following criteria:
1. Whether the development prese rves the best natural features of the site;
2. Whether the development creates , maintains, or improves habi tat for wildlife;
3. Whether the development creates, improves, or maintains open space for residents;
4. The extent to which the devel opment enhances the views into the site as well as the view from dwellings
to be built on site; and
5. The extent to which the developm ent results in a better develop ment, consistent with the purposes of the
PD per Section 9.1 and the recomme ndations of the City’s Compre hensive Plan.
(items marked in green above indicate the criteria the proposed development meets with respect to its
request for variations to the base spatial standards per staff’s review and assessment.)
PD Concept Plan: The PD Concept Plan shall be reviewed and appr oved as part of the zoning change request. The
applicant has provided the PD Co ncept Plan and Development Regu lations (Attachment E and F of this Staff
Report).
Of specific consideration is the property to the immediate east (JM Estes Addition Lot 3A1) located at
1150 Kennedale Sublett Road. Thi s adjoining property is approxi mately 4 acres in size and is
immediately adjacent to another platted subdivision (Glenn Oaks Addition). The property’s long and
narrow configuration and only acc ess along Kennedale Sublett Ro ad limit its future potential for
subdivision or incorporation into a new neighborhood layout. Th e applicant has been requested to
contact this adjoining property owner to explore the feasibilit y of coordinating development in order to
maximize the development opport unity and resulting tax base pot ential to the city.
Another consideration is the Thoroughfare Plan connection along Collette Sublett Road that would
create a direct connection between Kennedale Sublett Road and S winey Hiett Road. Given the potential
to induce speeding and cut‐through traffic, staff recommends ce rtain traffic calming measures to be
implemented to make the street s afe for all users of the roadwa y ‐‐residents, bicyclists, pedestrians, and
motorists. The applicant has proposed street neckdowns (chicane s) to 22’ of pavement width at three
different locations to address this concern.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, sta ff recommends approval of the r ezoning.
ACTION BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION
Public Hearing: Conduct a Public H earing to gather input from t he staff, applicant and the public.
Approval: Based on the informat ion presented, I find that the request meets city requirements and is in compliance
with the comprehensive land use plan and make a motion to appro ve the request for rezoning and concept plan.
Approval with Conditions: Based on the information presented, I find that the request meets city requirements and
is in compliance with the comprehensive land use plan and make a motion to approve the request for rezoning and
concept plan with the following conditions [list conditions].
Deny: Based on the information presented, I find that the propo sed use does not meet [list standards or requirements
not met] and make a motion to deny the request.
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 8
C. LOCATION MAP
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 9
AERIAL OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 10
SURROUNDING ZONING MAP
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 11
D. SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS AND RESPONSES
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 12
# Owner Name Owner Address Response
1 ABLES, GARY ALAN 1400 PEGGY LN NR
2 ALEISAWI, NADIR 2152 APPLE VALLEY RD NR
3 AMUNDSON, JONATHAN C 1112 FAWN MEADOW TR NR
4 BOX, JOEL G 1222 PEGGY LN NR
5 BREWER, SHERIDAN GLAZE PO BOX 222 NR
6 BUI, GIANG 1116 FAWN MEADOW TR NR
7 CHANG, SUNG HO 2900 ZEPHYR RD APT 1041 NR
8 CONDITT, CLAUDIA JILL 1224 PEGGY LN NR
9 DANIEL, WILLIAM M 1152 KENNEDALE SUBLETT RD NR
10 ENRIGUEZ, PEDRO 1218 PEGGY LN NR
11 ERICKSON, WYNELLE R 1408 PEGGY LN NR
12 FORD, LORA DELL 305 COLLETT SUBLETT RD NR
13 GARZA, DEANA 1210 PEGGY LN NR
14 GOOD, JACK 130 DEANNA LN NR
15 GOSTOMSKI, PEGGY 1513 WHITEWAY DR NR
16 GUZMAN, ENRIQUE 1218 PEGGY LN NR
17 HATFIELD, MARK 1114 FAWN MEADOW TR NR
18 HENG, DONALD 1402 PEGGY LN NR
19 HOWER, CAROL E 1306 PEGGY LN NR
20 IRWIN, JESSE D 1120 GLAZE LN NR
21 JACKSON, FREDDIE E 1110 FAWN MEADOW TR NR
22 JARAMILLO, REBECA 1308 PEGGY LN NR
23 JOHNSON, MICHAEL O 1300 PEGGY LN NR
24 LANDMARK BAPTIST CHURCH/ARL PO BOX 1306 NR
25 MCLELLAN, ROBERT JOESPH 1106 KENNEDALE SUBLETT RD NR
26 PULLIAM, RICHARD 1118 FAWN MEADOW TR NR
27 QUINTERO, EVA 1150 KENNEDALE SUBLETT RD NR
28 SMITH, THEODORE E 1202 PEGGY LN NR
29 STINSON, DAVID 1406 PEGGY LN NR
30 STRAIN, KELLY J 1112 KENNEDALE SUBLETT RD NR
31 TRACHIER, JOHN R 1404 PEGGY LN NR
32 WHITE, PATRICK 4301 N LORDSBURG CT In Favor
33 WILLIAMS, MARK 1214 PEGGY LN NR
NR = No Response
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 13
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 14
E. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 15
F. CONCEPT PLAN
Case #PZ18‐01 Staff Report to P&Z Commission Page 16
G. PD ORDINANCE
Proposed Concept Plan and PD Ordinance
1
ORDINANCE NO. 640
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 40, AS AMENDED; REZONING
CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF
KENNEDALE FROM “AG” AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO “PD” PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REFLECT SUCH CHANGES; PROVIDING THAT
THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING
FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Kennedale Texas is a Home Rule municipality acting under its charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the
Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has adopted a
comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other
structures and land for business, industrial, residential, or o ther purposes, for the purpose of
promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare , all in accordance with a
comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the property described below is within an area designated as N eighborhoods in
the Future Land Use Plan within the comprehensive land use plan ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the “PD” Planned Developm ent district is
the most suitable zoning district for the property described be low, in accordance with the
comprehensive land use plan, and with the standards in the Unif ied Development Code; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly held by the Planning and Zoning Comm ission of the
City of Kennedale on the 19 th day of April 2018 and by the City Council of the City of Kenne dale
on the 21 st day of May 2018 with respect to the zoning changes described h erein; and
WHEREAS, all requirements of law dealing with notice to other property owners, publication
and all procedural requirements have been complied with in acco rdance with Chapter 211 of the
Local Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby deem it advisable and in the publ ic interest to
amend the City's Zoning Ordinance as described herein.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENNEDALE, TEXAS:
2
SECTION 1.
The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended so that th e zoning
classification and the uses in the hereinafter described area s hall be changed and or restricted
as shown and described below:
An approximately 17.4 acre tract described as Lot 4R-1 and an a pproximately 5.8
acre tract described as Lot 3B1, JM Estes Home Tracts, Tarrant County, Texas
("the Property''), as more particularly described on Exhibit "A " attached hereto and
incorporated herein, “AG” Agricultural District to “PD” Planned Development
district .
SECTION 2.
The uses in the PD shall conform to the uses permitted in the “R-3” single-family
residential zoning district. The PD development shall be subjec t to the restrictions, terms, and
conditions set forth in the Concept Plan and Development Regula tions, attached hereto as
Exhibit “C” and Exhibit “B” respectively, and the UDC for the p urpose of promoting the health,
safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The Devel opment Standards in Exhibit “B”
shall supersede those in the UDC in case of any conflict. All o ther standards shall meet the City
of Kennedale UDC, as amended. They have been designed to lessen congestion in the streets,
to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers, to provide adequate light and air, to
prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of p opulation, to facilitate the
adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, parks a nd other public requirements.
They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reas onable consideration among
other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and
with a view of conserving the value of the buildings and encour aging the most appropriate use
of land throughout the community.
SECTION 3.
The City Secretary is hereby directed to amend the official zon ing map to reflect the
changes in classifications approved herein.
SECTION 4.
This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinan ces and of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Kennedale, Texas (1991), as amended, including but not limited to all
Ordinances of the City of Kennedale affecting zoning and land u se, and shall not repeal any of
the provisions of such ordinances except in those instances whe re provisions of such ordinances
are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 5.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined
not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense . Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
3
SECTION 7.
All rights or remedies of the City of Kennedale Texas are expre ssly saved as to any and
all violations of any ordinances governing zoning or of any ame ndments thereto that have
accrued at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance and as to such accrued violations and
all pending litigation both civil and criminal same shall not b e affected by this Ordinance but may
be prosecuted until final disposition by the Courts.
SECTION 8.
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council t hat the phrases clauses
sentences paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severab le and if any phrase clause
sentence paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declar ed unconstitutional by the valid
judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction such unconstitutionality shall not affect
any of the remaining phrases clauses sentences paragraphs and s ections of this ordinance since
the same would have been enacted by the City Council without th e incorporation in this ordinance
of any such unconstitutional phrase clause sentence paragraph o r section.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Kennedale is hereby directed to publish the caption,
Section 1, the penalty clause, the publication clause, and the effective date clause of this
ordinance in every issue of the official newspaper of the City of Kennedale for two days or one
issue of the newspaper if the official newspaper is a weekly ne wspaper as authorized by Section
3.10 of the City of Kennedale Charter.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law and it is so ordained.
4
PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS 21 st DAY OF MAY 2018.
APPROVED:
Mayor, ______________
ATTEST:
City Secretary, Leslie Galloway
EFFECTIVE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
City Attorney, Wayne K. Olson
5
Exhibit “A”
Metes and Bounds Description
Tract 1
Beginning at an iron pipe at the northwest corner of said lot 5 , in the south right‐of‐way line of
Kennedale‐Sublett road (60' R.O.W ), same being s 89° 34' 37" W. a distance of 1245.00 feet from the
northeast corner of said J. M. Estes home tracts;
Thence n 89° 34' 37" E . with said north line of lot 5 and lot 4 , a distance of 498.00 feet to an iron rod for
corner;
Thence s 0° 36' 43", E. with the east line of said lot 4, a dis tance of 1,724.77 feet to an iron pipe for
corner;
Thence n 89° 46' 45” W. with the south line of said lots 4 and 5, a distance of 498.31 feet to an iron pipe
for corner;
Thence n 0° 36' 12" W. with the west line of said Lot 5, a dist ance of 1,719.17 feet to the place of
beginning and containing 857,761.00 square feet or 19.691 acres of land.
Tract 2
Being a tract of land, being a portion of Tract 3, J.M. Estes H ome Tracts. a subdivision out of the J.M. Lilly
Survey, Abstract 985, and the W .E. Haltom Survey, Abstract 1791 , in the City of Kennedale, Tarrant
County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 1857, P age 283, Deed Records, of Tarrant
County, Texas; said tract of land being described by metes and bounds as follows:
Beginning at an iron pin found in the south line of Kennedale‐S ublett Road (County Road No. 2056),
being the northwest corner of sa id Tract 3, J.M. Estes Home Tra cts;
Thence along the south line of said Kennedale‐Sublett Road and the north line of said Tract 3, East 124.5
feet to the iron pin found, being the northwest comer of a trac t of land describe din deed recorded in
Volume 7258, Page 328, Deed Recor ds of Tarrant County, Texas;
Thence leaving the north line of said Tract 3 and along a fence line and the west line of said tract of land
described in deed recorded in Volume 7258, Page 328. Deed Recor ds of Tarrant County, Texas, South
1399.52 feel to an iron pin found, b eing the southwest corner o f said tract of land;
Thence along a fence line and th e south line of said tract of l and described in deed recorded in Volume
7258. Page 32B, Deed Records of Ta rrant County, Texas, East 124 .5 feet to an iron pin found for the
southeast corner of said tract o f land, said point being in the east line of said Tract 3;
Thence along a fence line along said east line, South 325.90 fe et (according to pla t: 316.24 feet) to an
6
iron pin found for the southeast comer of said Tract 3;
Thence along a fence line and the south line of said Tract 3, N orth 89 degrees 46 minutes West 249.0
feet to an iron pin found for the southwest corner of said Trac t 3;
Thence along the west line of said Tract 3, partially along a f ence line, North 1724.84 foot (plat distance
1715.60 feet to the point of begi nning, containing approximatel y 5.86 acres of la nd, more or less.
SAVE AND EXCEPT:
Being a 0.066 of an acre tract of land situated within the J.M. Lilly Survey, Abstract No. 985, and being a
portion of Tract 3, J.M. Estes Home Tracts, an addition to the City of Kennedale, Tarrant County, Texas as
recorded in Volume 1857, Page 283, Plat Records, Tarrant County , Texas and also being a portion of a
tract of land described to Patrick M. White and wife, Peggy L. White by deed record ed in Volume 7400,
Page 257. Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and
bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a 5/8 inch iron rod found for the northwest comer of said White tract, same being on the
south right‐of‐way line of Kennedale Sublett Road (a variable w idth right‐of‐way);
THENCE South 89°58'22" East, wit h said south right‐of‐way line, a distance of 124.51 feet to a point for
the northeast corner of said Whi te tract, from which a 3/8 inch iron rod found for the northeast corner
of a tract of land described to D empsey S. Farmer and Sandra S. Farmer by deed recorded in Volume
14846, Page 1 of said Deed Records bears South 89°58'22" East, 124.33 feet;
THENCE South 01° 00'16" East, with the east line of said White tract, a distance of 14.93 feet to a 5/8
inch capped iron rod stamped "TNP" set for corner;
THENCE South 89°57'30" West, ove r and across said White tract, a distance of 44.14 fe et to a 5/8 inch
capped iron rod stamped "TNP" set for comer;
THENCE South 75° 44'41" West, continuing over and across said W hite tract, a distance of 57.70 feet to
a 5/8 inch capped iron rod sta mped "TNP" set for corner;
THENCE South 45°00'00" West, conti nuing over and across said Wh ite tract, a distance of 33.65 feet to a
5/8 inch capped iron rod stamped "TNP" set for corner on the we st line of same;
THENCE North 00°59'22" West, with said west line, a distance of 53.02 feet to the point of beginning and
containing 0.066 of an acre of land, more or less.
Note: The Company is prohibited from insuring the area or quant ity of the land described herein. Any
statement in the legal descripti on contained in Schedule "An as to area or quantity of land is not a
representation that such area or quantity is co rrect, but is ma de only for informal identification
purposes and does not override Item 2 of Schedule "B" hereof.
7
Exhibit “B”
Magnolia Hills Planned Development District Standards
8
“Magnolia Hills” Planned Development
The use of the Property shall be subject to the restrictions, terms and conditions set forth in the
Concept Plan and the Planned Deve lopment standards, attached he reto and as stated below.
1) Property location and size.
Magnolia Hills Planned Development (Subject Property ) is established on property located
south of the roundabout/intersect ion of Wildcat Way and Kenneda le Sublett Road. This
Planned Development is comprised of two (2) tracts of land cons isting of approximately 23
gross acres, more particularly a nd shown on the Concept Plan, w hich is attached hereto for
all purposes.
2) Purpose
To create a Planned Development for ninety‐two (92) single fami ly residential lots. The
minimum gross density and a net density are as shown on the Con cept Plan. An entry
feature will be provided at the connection point to Kennedale S ublett Road. This
neighborhood will meet at least 5 of the qualifying conditions as laid out in Section 9.2 of
the Unified Development Code (UD C). These conditions include; a provision of open space,
efficient consolidation of poorly dimensioned parcels, effectiv e transition between higher
and lower density uses, shared vehicular and pedestrian access between properties, and
mitigation to offset impacts on public infrastructure.
3) Development plan.
The proposed Concept Plan will be in complete accordance with t he provisions of the
approved Planned Development and shall be binding upon the appl icant thereof, his
successors and assigns, and shall limit and control all buildin g permits.
4) Lot Composition and Layout. The lot layout and composition shal l generally conform to the
Concept Plan and stated in Table 1 , which is as follows:
Table 1: Lot Composition
Lot Type Lot Size (FT) Lot Size (SF)
A 50’ x 120’ 6,000 SF
B 60’ x 120’ 7,200 SF
5) Unless specifically provided by this Planned Development ordina nce, the development standards
stipulated by the Single‐Family Residential District (R‐3) are applicable to all development on the
Subject Property . The maximum permissible density for the Subject Property shall not exceed 4
dwelling units per gross acre of land; however, in no case shou ld the proposed development
exceed 92 units. All lots shall conform to the standards depict ed in Table 2 , which is as follows:
9
Table 2: Lot Dimens ional Requirements
Lot Type (see Concept Plan)
10
A) Architectural attributes for this residential development will consist of the following:
1) Facades will avoid large expanses of uninterrupted single exter ior materials and
must be broken up by changes in plane through architectural att enuation,
accented with the effects of window placement, window trim, or material type
and color changes.
2) Shutters, if provided, will be sized and shaped to match the as sociated openings.
3) Gutters, if provided, will be exposed or painted copper, galvan ized steel, or
aluminum if exposed to the street.
4) All asphalt roof shingles will be laminated architectural shing les with a three‐
dimensional appearance and warranted for at least thirty (30) y ears.
a) Roof Materials.
i. All roof shingles shall be an arch itectural or dimensional shin gle (3‐Tab
Roofing Shingles are prohibited ).
5) A minimum of overall 8:12 roof pitch is required on all structures with the exception
of sunrooms, covered patios, and porches, which shall have a mi nimum of a 4:12 roof
pitch. Front and rear elevations may have 6:12 roof pitch.
6) In order to encourage variety on a continuous block, the exteri or facades for
houses will vary within every 6 h ouses. Once a house is constru cted the same
combination of brick, stone, masonry‐like materials, and paint will not be used
within four (4) houses on either side of that house.
a) Identical brick blends or paint colors may not occur on adjacen t (side‐by‐side)
properties along any block face w ithout at least four (4) inter vening homes of
11
differing materials on the same side of the street beginning wi th the adjacent
property and two (2) intervening homes of differing materials o n the opposite
side of the street.
b) Front building elevations shall not repeat along any block face without at least
four (4) intervening homes of di ffering appearance on the same side of the street
and two (2) intervening homes of differing appearance on the op posite side of the
street. Homes are considered to have a differing appearance if any of the
following two (2) items deviate:
i. Number of stories
ii. Permitted encroachment type and layout
iii. Roof type and layout
iv. Articulation of the front façade
7) The minimum masonry requirement for the exterior façades of all bui ldings shall be
80%. For the purposes of this or dinance the masonry requiremen t shall be limited to
full width brick, natural stone a nd cast stone. Cementaceous fi berboard, horizontal
lap‐siding (e.g. HardiBoard or Hardy Plank, Hardi Stucco Board ) and, stucco (i.e. three
[3] part stucco or a comparable ‐‐ to be determined by staff ) may all be used in
addition to the masonry requirement.
8) Any home with a covered front porch shall be at least fifty (50 ) square feet in
total size to allow this space to be usable. A covered porch ma y encroach into
area designated as front yard or side yard not greater than fiv e (5) feet to help
improve the architecture of the home and the character of the s treet.
9) Garages shall be oriented in a f ront entry configuration or a “J” Swing
configuration. If a front entry garage configura tion is utilize d there shall be a
minimum driveway length of 20‐feet.
10) Decorative street lighting will be utilized and will conform to Oncor and City of
Kennedale standards and include the following if approved by an d available from
Oncor: low profiling lighting; or induction lights (LED), scotopic lumens allowing
street lights with lower wattage s and lower photopic lumens. Li ghting shall be
consistent with the design of the neighborhood and shall be dis tinguished from
lights on adjacent or nearby arterial streets.
a) Light poles shall not exceed 20‐fe et in total height (i.e. base and lighting
standard). All fixtures shall be directed downward and be posit ioned to contain all
light within the development area.
12
11) The landscape design along Kenne dale Sublett Road will utilize tubular steel
fencing and architectural features at the entrance to the subdi vision.
12) All common open space, landscapi ng in open space areas, private roads, drainage
areas and masonry columns will h ave a mandatory Home Owners’ As sociation
(HOA) to maintain those improvements.
13) Utility, Service and Mechanical Equipment
a) All equipment related to utilities intended to serve one Lot sh all be installed
by the Owner of the Lot and shal l be located underground if pos sible.
b) All services to the Lot, includi ng pre‐wiring for cable televis ion, must be
installed underground if available.
c) Ground‐mounted mechanical equipment, such as HVAC units, shall be
screened from view and grouped to gether away from street and pu blic view.
Private, surface‐mounted mechanical equipment, air conditioners ,
condensers, compressors, pool equ ipment, switches, etc. should be placed
behind the side yard fence of a Lot.
14) All wood fencing will be constru cted of spruce and shall comply with the following:
a) All wood fences shall be constructed of a standard fencing mate rial and use
fasteners that are hot dipped ga lvanized or stainless steel. G enerally, the
Wood Fences shall be spruce or whitewood, with a maximum height of 6 feet,
with metal posts. Wood fences fa cing onto a street shall be pa inted and/or
stained and sealed with all pickets being placed on the public side facing the
street. All wood fences shall be pre‐stained, smooth‐finished, free of burs
and splinters, and be a maximu m of six (6) feet in height.
b) The side yards and rear yards of all residential lots shall hav e a minimum
six‐foot (6’) high spruce fence to be installed by the builder and
maintained by homeowner. The woo d fences cannot be located in f ront
of the front façade of the building.
15) Wrought Iron/Tubular Steel fencing shall be installed on the lo t lines that are abutting
green space, green belts and park s. These fences will be instal led by the homebuilder
and can be a maximum of six (6) f eet in height. Open space Lot 2X, Block F shall have
spruce fencing as the open space border. This spruce fencing sh all be installed by the
13
developer.
16) The HOA shall require builder(s) to provide at least two (2) si ngle‐story options for
homebuyer consideration.
7) General conditions.
A) Landscaping and Open Space.
1) The City’s Landscaping ordinance will supersede where this ordi nance is silent.
This ordinance will supersed e to resolve any conflicts.
2) The development shall consist of no less than 3 acres of open s pace and shall
generally conform to the Concept Plan. Any open space within th e development may
be used as a detention pond or retention pond. Within the open spaces, there will be
a minimum amount of amenities included in at least one of the o pen spaces. The
minimum amount of amenities shall include: benches, trash cans and a shade
structure. Due to the amount of open space being provided on th is project, the all
fees associated with the City of Kennedale parks department sha ll be waived.
3) There will be a minimum of two 3 '' caliper trees per residentia l lot located in the
front yard and installed by the homebuilder. All tree locations and types will
conform to the City of Kennedale ordinances. For purposes of th is section only
(Section 7.A.3), the term “front yard” includes the area within the dedicated
right‐of‐way for a roadway immediately adjoining the front yard of the lot.
4) There will be a minimum of 6 three‐gallon (3 gal) shrubs per re sidential lot
located in the front yard. All shrub locations and types will c onform to the City of
Kennedale ordinances.
5) All lawns and landscaping will be irrigated.
6) Landscaping will be installed by the developer at the entry to the subdivision and
in common areas, including within the right‐of‐way for Kennedal e Sublett Road
and along the subdivision wrought iron/tubular steel fencing, a nd along the right‐
of‐way on Kennedale Sublett Road adjacent to the planned develo pment district.
a) Landscaping shall be irrigated
b) The following plant types shall be included in the landscaping along the
Kennedale Sublett Road right‐of‐way:
i. Five‐gallon (5 gal) shrubs;
ii. Three‐inch (3”) caliper trees with one planted at least every f orty (40)
feet.
7) The entry of the subdivision w ill include a minimum of one (1) entry statement at the
connection of Collett Sublett to the roundabout on Kennedale Su blett. This will serve
as a permanent subdivision ident ification sign and will general ly conform to the
signage depicted below. Final des ign and location of any entry feature shall be
reviewed and approved with the Preliminary Plat. The following sketches are
representations of what maybe in stalled at the entry to the sub division:
14
8) Landscaping installed by the deve loper shall be maintained by t he Homeowners’
15
Association (HOA).
9) Right‐Of‐Way. Street right‐of‐way within the s ubdivision will be equal to 50' in
width and have a 27’ back to bac k paving section. Collett Suble tt will be a 65’ right‐
of‐way with a 32’ back to back pa ving section. There will be se ctions of Collett
Sublett that will taper down to a 22’ back to back paving secti on, to serve as
“traffic calming sections.” There will be a minimum of 2 of the se “traffic calming
sections” along Collett Sublett. All houses on Collett Sublett shall face the street
and shall have driveways accessi ng Collett Sublett. Where the s treet sections are
tapered down to a 22’ back to back paving section, there will b e additional
landscaping.
10) Lot Area and Setbacks. Lot areas and setbacks will b e as shown on the Concept
Plan and as in Table 2 .
11) Minimum Floor Area per dwelling unit. All lots will have a minimum of 1,800
square feet of dwelling space.
12) Perimeter Walls/Screening. The perimeter fencing adjacent to Kennedale Sublett
Road will be a minimum of 6' in height and be constructed of tu bular steel.
B) Sidewalk Requirements.
1) Sidewalks will be required throughout the development. If not i nstalled by the
developer, sidewalks along residential lots (front yards and si de yards) are to be
constructed by the home builder at the time of home constructio n for each
residential lot.
2) Sidewalks shall be a minimum of four (4) feet in width. All tra ils within the
development will be six (6) feet in width. The tr ail around the retention/detention
pond will be four (4) feet in w idth and will be made of natural material, such as
mulch, gravel and other natural materials.
C) Access to the public parks will be provided within the developm ent.
1) Access shall comply with accessi bility standards and fire code
8) Homeowners’ Association.
Homeowner’s Association (HOA). A Homeowner’s Association sh all be created to enforce the
restrictions established in acco rdance with the HOA requirement s of the City of Kennedale UDC.
The HOA shall also maintain all neighborhood parks, trails, ope n space and common areas,
irrigation, landscaping, amenity centers, screening fences asso ciated with this development.
16
Exhibit “C”
Magnolia Hills Concept Plan