The URL can be used to link to this page

2016_11.17 PZ Packet ic KENNEDALE Planning and Zoning Commission www.cityofkennedale.com KENNEDALE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA COMMISSIONERS - REGULAR MEETING November 17, 2016 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 405 MUNICIPAL DRIVE WORK SESSION - 6:00 PM REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. WORK SESSION A. Discuss any item on the regular session agenda IV. REGULAR SESSION V. CALL TO ORDER VI. ROLL CALL VII. MINUTES APPROVAL A. Consider approval of minutes from the October 20, 2016 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting VIII. VISITOR/CITIZENS FORUM At this time, any person with business before the Planning and Zoning Commission not scheduled on the Agenda may speak to the Commission, provided that an official `Speaker's Request Form'has been completed and submitted to the Commission Secretary prior to the start of the meeting. All comments must be directed towards the Chair, rather than individual commissioners or staff. All speakers must limit their comments to the subject matter as listed on the `Speaker's Request Form.' No formal action can be taken on these items. IX. REGULAR ITEMS A. CASE # PZ 16-12 Consider approval of Ordinance No. 609 regarding a request by Joe Boston, Jr for SOS Renovations, LLC for a zoning change from "AG"Agricultural to "R-3" Single-family residential for approximately 1.5 acres in the W E Haltom Survey A-731 and described in a deed recorded as D213282537 in the Tarrant County deed records and located at 1115 Border Ln. 1. Staff presentation 2. Applicant presentation 3. Staff response and summary 4. Action by the Planning &Zoning Commission B. CASE # PZ 16-14 Public hearing and consideration of a request by Joyce Stanton for re-platting of 1399 J R Hawkins Rd., legal description of Falcon Wood Estates Section One, Block 1, Lot 17, Kennedale, Tarrant County, Texas. The replat would create Lots 17R-A and 17 R-B. 1. Staff presentation 2. Applicant presentation 3. Public hearing 4. Applicant response 5. Staff response and summary 6. Action by the Planning &Zoning Commission C. CASE# PZ 16-15 Public hearing and consideration of a request by the Kennedale Economic Development Corporation for re-platting of Block 5, Lots 1-6 and 12-16, Oak Crest Addition, Kennedale, Tarrant County, Texas. The replat would create Lots 1 R &6R, Block 5. 1. Staff presentation 2. Applicant presentation 3. Public hearing 4. Applicant response 5. Staff response and summary 4. Action by the Planning &Zoning Commission X. REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS XI.ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Kennedale will provide for reasonable accommodations for persons attending City Council meetings. This building is wheelchair accessible, and parking spaces for disabled citizens are available. Requests for sign interpreter services must be made forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meetings. Please contact the City Secretary at 817.985.2104 or(TDD) 1.800.735.2989 CERTIFICATION I certify that a copy of the November 17, 2016, Planning and Zoning Commission agenda was posted on the City Hall bulletin board next to the main entrance of the City Hall building, 405 Municipal Drive, of the City of Kennedale, Texas, in a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times and said agenda was posted at least 72 hours preceding the schedule time of said meeting,in accordance with Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code. O�Lu�03 Rach I Roberts, Board Secretary ic KENNEDALE Planning and Zoning Commission www.cityofl,cennedale.com STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Date: November 17, 2016 Agenda Item No: WORK SESSION- A. I. Subject: Discuss any item on the regular session agenda II. Originated by: III. Summary: IV. Notification: V. Fiscal Impact Summary: VI. Legal Impact: VII. Recommendation: VIII. Alternative Actions: IX. Attachments: ic KENNEDALE Planning and Zoning Commission www.cityofl,cennedale.com STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Date: November 17, 2016 Agenda Item No: MINUTES APPROVAL - A. I. Subject: Consider approval of minutes from the October 20, 2016 Planning &Zoning Commission meeting II. Originated by: Dale Gwak, Permit Clerk III. Summary: The minutes from the October meeting are attached to this page for your review and consideration. IV. Notification: V. Fiscal Impact Summary: VI. Legal Impact: VII. Recommendation: Approve VIII. Alternative Actions: IX. Attachments: 1. 110.20.2016 PZ Minutes 110.20.2016 PZ Minutes FINAL VERSION.doc KENNEDALE Planning and Zoning Commission www.cityofi(ennedale.com KENNEDALE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES COMMISSIONERS - REGULAR MEETING October 20, 2016 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 405 MUNICIPAL DRIVE WORK SESSION - 6:00 PM REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Harvey called the meeting to order at 6:17 PM. II. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER Ernest Harvey, Chair V Carolyn Williamson V Stephen Brim V Thomas Pirtle V Patrick Filson V Horace Young, Alternate V Greg Adams,Alternate V A quorum was present. Staff Present: Rachel Roberts (Planning Director) Dale Gwak (Permits Clerk and Board Secretary) III. WORK SESSION A. Discuss any item on the regular session agenda The Commission discussed case PZ 16-13. Ms. Roberts said that only four of the seven lots at the address were proposed for rezoning, with the three closest to Mansfield Cardinal proposed to remain as residential zoning. She mentioned that the Unified Development Code's new regulations were intended to help with compatibility of commercial uses next to adjacent uses. PZ 16-12 Mr. Harvey asked Ms. Roberts questions about that site. Ms. Roberts said when a neighbor had mentioned a 50-foot easement in a previous meeting, she had assumed he meant a roadway easement, but the only 50-foot easement staff could find a record of was an easement related to the nearby city water well. That easement did not appear to encroach on the property proposed for rezoning, but it would need to be confirmed by the applicant's surveyor, since there was a problem with the easement exhibit showing the north arrow facing the wrong way, and staff couldn't be entirely sure about the accuracy of the exhibit in that case If there is an easement affecting the property, the applicant may not be able to fit as many houses as he wished. The Commission discussed the possibilities that the owner would have with an R-2 zoning instead of an R-3 zoning as the applicant/owner had applied for. There were some concerns about the setback requirements that an R-2 was going to have in an area that was so limited in space. Mr. Harvey asked if the owner could be allowed a special exception, but Ms. Roberts advised him that this would not be possible because special exceptions do not affect setbacks, so instead, asking for a variance could be a possibility since the owner was subject to some legitimate concerns regarding space. Mr. Harvey also asked about the potential of impact on local property prices. Ms. Roberts advised him that most likely there would be no negative effect of property prices The work session closed at 7:OOPM. IV. REGULAR SESSION V. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Harvey called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. VI. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONER Ernest Harvey, Chair V Carolyn Williamson V Stephen Brim V Thomas Pirtle V Patrick Filson V Horace Young, Alternate V Greg Adams,Alternate V A quorum was present. Staff Present: Rachel Roberts (Planning Director) Dale Gwak (Permits Clerk and Board Secretary) Other People Present: Harry Browne (Accidentally left off the list of Commission Board Members. Will be reappointed in November 2016. Attendance was accidental, no one was aware of this change.). Harry Browne was also present. Due to the recent appointment process, the Commission and staff did not realize the Mr. Browne had not yet been reappointed to the Commission. VII. MINUTES APPROVAL A. Consider approval of minutes from the September 15,2016 regular meeting. Mr. Pirtle motioned to approve the minutes, seconded by Ms. Williamson. The motion passed unanimously. VIII. VISITOR/CITIZENS FORUM No one registered to speak. IX. REGULAR ITEMS A. CASE# PZ 16-12 Public hearing and consider approval of Ordinance No. 609 regarding a request by Joe Boston, Jr for SOS Renovations, LLC for a zoning change from "AG"Agricultural to `R-3" Single-family residential for approximately 1.5 acres in the W E Haltom Survey A-731 and described in a deed recorded as D213282537 in the Tarrant County deed records and located at 1115 Border Ln. Ms. Roberts gave the staff presentation. She said that staff had looked into the 50-foot easement mentioned by a neighboring property owner at the previous meeting, and the only record they found was for a sanitary control easement that does not appear to affect this property, although this would need to be verified by a surveyor. She said an easement could affect how many lots could be created but should not affect zoning, since there is nothing that prevents the lots from being larger than the minimum size. She also said that the city has R-1 neighborhoods next to R-3, such as Falcon Wood, and this has not appeared to have negative impact on property values or neighborhood character. In response to questions from the Commission, she said land within the sanitary control easement land could be a part of someone's yard but would have restrictions to where drainage and sewer systems could be located. Joe Boston (the applicant) provided an overview of his plan for this property. He expressed his wish to have the area zoned as R-3 (currently Agricultural AG) instead of the Board's suggestion that R-2 might be a better option. He provided the property values of neighboring areas where R-3 zones were right next to R-1 and/or R-2, and how the R-3 zones did not affect the property prices of the R-1/R-2 properties. He explained that the zoning plan would in fact help the neighborhood as it would create a buffer between the R-1 areas and the school nearby. He said that an R-3 zoning is what he really wanted, but if an R-2 is recommended, that he would be willing to accept that as well. Mr. Ernest Harvey expressed concerns about the "buffer" and transition argument that Mr. Boston had presented for making the zoning in the area R-3. There was no one who signed up to speak on the Public Hearing portion of the meeting. The discussion for staff concerns was raised. Ms. Rachel Roberts expressed concerns that due to the odd nature of the lot size, if the property were zoned R-2, there was a danger that an unusable lot could be created. However, public works might be able to make an exception to the road width requirement. Mr. Brim said that too much restriction could in fact lead to the land being undevelopable. Mr. Harvey suggested zoning it as Planned Development (PD)to satisfy the unusual nature of the lot and make it more consistent with the residential area around it. Mr. Harvey explained to Mr. Boston that a PD zoning approach would be better than R-3 or R-2 because the regulations could be set to make it possible to build homes that would not only satisfy the residents in the area but also stand a better chance of satisfying the City Council who ultimately has the last say and the decision making powers on zoning. Mr. Harvey also clarified that an R-3 would be unfavorable because a zoning is more or less permanent, and should the land fall under different ownership, there would be little or nothing to stop them from building seven or so more homes in a row on that lot, which is exactly what the homeowners in the vicinity are concerned about. Mr. Boston was advised by Mr. Harvey to have his engineers begin looking at site design so that more specifics could be put into place for the rezoning of the property. Mr. Brim made a motion to table the case until the November 17 meeting, seconded by Mr. Pirtle. The motion passed unanimously. B. Case # PZ 16-13 700 Mansfield Cardinal Rd. Public hearing and consideration of Ordinance approval regarding a request by John K. Dancer for change in zoning from R-3 (single family residential) to C-2 (general commercial) for.688 acres at 700 Mansfield Cardinal Rd, legal description of CA Boaz subdivision of JB Renfro, block 13, lots 4-7, Kennedale, Tarrant County, Texas. Ms. Roberts gave the staff presentation. She said the property itself looks like one large lot but is actually seven lots. The applicant's plan is to apply for a zoning change for four of those seven lots from R-3 residential to C-2 commercial. The land is vacant and has commercial and residential uses nearby. The comprehensive plan shows the area as part of the Urban Corridor, which is expected to be auto-oriented commercial uses. The request is consistent with the city's strategic plan goal of assisting the expansion of existing businesses. Concerns about the impact of businesses operating next to residential areas have been taken into account with the updated UDC which has put better and more stringent noise, light, and buffering requirements, and with all those factors taken into account, staff considered the rezoning to be appropriate at this location. Applicant John Dancer of 2001 Dancer Dr., Arlington, TX, provided the applicant presentation. He explained that the plan to rezone should not adversely affect anyone in the area because the plan is to extend the existing structure into the lots that are being requested for rezoning into C-2 and to leave the remaining lots as residential zoning. The entrance to the lot will remain as is on Kennedale Highway, and additional access roads either via Mansfield Cardinal Road or Meadowview Drive would not be constructed. When asked about security lighting possibly affecting the nearby residences, Mr. Dancer assured Mr. Harvey that due to the nature of the structure, it would not be possible. The Chairman opened the public hearing. Two people requested to speak: Dr. Stanley Seat of 1325 Meadowview Dr. and Dean Dunaway of 612 Mansfield Cardinal Rd. Dr. Seat raised the issue that the owner has not kept up with the property. He was also concerned about the potential light pollution problems and about traffic problems that may arise. He said he would be open to supporting this rezoning if the owner kept up with the property. He also stated that his wife had called the city to enquire about what structure would be built but claimed that the city provided no answers. Mr. Dunaway stated that he is the current owner of the property that Dr. Seat raised concerns about. Mr. Dunaway claimed that the difficulty in keeping up with the property stemmed from Meadowview Dr. He claimed that since the road was put in about three years ago, maintenance had been extremely difficult. The Chairman called for the applicant response. Mr. John Dancer explained that the property would now be kept up because it would be redeveloped. He presented pictures on slideshow to serve as visuals. He indicated that his plan involved land between the business and the residences being landscaped to become more esthetically pleasing. He also made assurances that the plans would ensure that truck traffic would not be present near the residential areas. The Chairman called for the staff response. Ms. Rachel Roberts stressed that the new UDC has restrictions, such as lighting restrictions to prevent light pollution from affecting the residential areas. Also that there was no plan for the city to expand the existing residential areas toward Kennedale Pkwy, as that is not part of the comprehensive plan. Ms. Rachel Roberts recommended approval of the rezoning application. Mr. Pirtle made a motion to recommend approval, seconded by Ms. Williamson. The motion passed with all in favor. Mr. Harvey said that the City Council will consider this case during its meeting on November 21. X. REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS Ms. Roberts said the KKB Bring It event would be held on October 22, and so would the library's Pumpkin Palooza and the YAC's Trunk-or-Treat. She said the Christmas Tree Lighting Festival would be on December 6. XI. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 8:30PM. Attest: Ernest Harvey,Chair Dale Gwak, Board Secretary Date )c KENNEDALE Planning and Zoning Commission www.cityofkennedale.com STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date: November 17, 2016 Agenda Item No: REGULAR ITEMS (A) I. SUBJECT CASE # PZ 16-12 Consider approval of Ordinance 609 regarding a request by Joe Boston, Jr for SOS Renovations, LLC for a zoning change from "AG" Agricultural to "R-3" Single-family residential for approximately 1.5 acres in the W E Haltom Survey A-731 and described in a deed recorded as D213282537 in the Tarrant County deed records and located at 1115 Border Ln. II. SUMMARY N BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Request Rezone Applicant Joe Boston for SOS Renovations Location Border Lane, behind Shady Creek East neighborhood (see map) Surrounding Uses Single family residential; educational Surrounding Zonings R-1 single family residential to the east and west; Agricultural to the north, and R-3 and R-2 single family residential to the south Future Land Use Plan Designation Neighborhood Staff Recommendation Approve R-2 and R-3 zoning with conditions UPDATED STAFF REPORT (CASE CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER) During last month's meeting, the Commission discussed the idea of using a planned development district for rezoning rather than the R-3 district requested by the applicant. The Commission can recommend rezoning for a less intensive (more restrictive) zoning district that was requested by the an applicant, and the Commission considered this option because a few of the neighboring property owners objected to the lot size allowed through R-3 zoning. The Commission postponed voted on this case for one month and recommended that the applicant meet with his surveyor and engineer in the meantime to look at what development options might work for him, taking into account how many lots he would like to create as well as the amount of right-of-way dedication that might be required and the existing property size. Since last month's meeting, city planning staff has discussed the concept with the city attorney, who advised us that a planned development district is not necessarily considered a less intensive zoning district and that the PD idea was not really a feasible option. Keeping in mind the Commission's desire to balance the applicant's request (which conforms to the comprehensive land use plan) with objections from some of the neighboring property owners, staff recommends rezoning a portion of the property to R-2 and a portion to R-3. Specifically, staff recommends rezoning a half-acre of the property that includes the existing house as R-2 and rezoning the remainder as R-3. The property is not deep enough to meet the standards for an R-2 zoning district if the lots were to be oriented to the existing road, and generally it's better to avoid creating lots that can't meet standard development practices such as having lots oriented toward the road. With R-3 zoning, however, any new lots created would be deep enough that lots and homes could be oriented toward the existing roadway. Planning staff has met with public works staff about the roadway, and they have no objection to the fifty feet of roadway owned by the city being used as public right-of-way. Staff's recommendation is to rezone the half acre of the property with the house as R-2 single family residential and the remaining property as R-3 single family residential. Staff recommends this rezoning be approved on the condition that the applicant's surveyor provide a metes and bounds description of the portions to be rezoned as R-2 and R-3 as an exhibit for the ordinance. The original staff report from September is shown below for your reference. CURRENT STATUS OF • . The property is approximately 1.5 acres in size and has one house; the property is owned by the applicant. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES & NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS All of the zoning districts surrounding this property are for single family residential use: R-1, R-2, and R-3 single family residential, as well as Agricultural. SURROUNDING LAND USES The majority of properties surrounding this one are single-family residential in use. The exception is the east side, which is the high school property. STAFF REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The Future Land Use Plan shows this area as part of a Neighborhood character district. The comprehensive plan states that the Neighborhood character district should be primarily residential in nature. Neighborhoods should have defined boundaries, a clear center, and be easily accessible to day-to-day goods and services...The center of a neighborhood should be a civic, public, or community use in which people can come together—such as a park, school, or neighborhood amenity center. The proposed rezoning would provide for single family residential development, which conforms to the comprehensive land use plan. The property is surrounded by existing residential development, so it can't feasibly connect to an existing community or civic use, and providing such a space would be difficult in a site this size. Staff considers the requested rezoning to be in compliance with the comprehensive land use plan. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER CITY PLANS AND POLICIES STRATEGIC PLAN The recommendations of the strategic plan do not relate to the requested rezoning. CITY COUNCIL PRIORITIES MEASURED THROUGH THE BALANCED SCORECARD Only one of the Council's priorities as measured through the balance scorecard relates to this request, which is enhancing the business climate relates to this rezoning request. Increasing the number of residents who can use Kennedale businesses was identified as one way to enhance the business climate, and the R-3 zoning district allows for more residences — and therefore more people — than the Agricultural zoning district does. ADDITIONAL FACTORS TO CONSIDER When considering rezoning requests, the City may also consider the appropriateness of current zoning and whether a rezoning would have an adverse impact on surrounding properties. In this case, the current zoning is no longer appropriate. The area is primarily suburban in character, and agricultural operations permitted under current zoning would not be suitable. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, staff recommends approval of the rezoning. ACTION • NING COMMISION Approval: Based on the information presented, I find that the request conforms to the comprehensive land use plan and meets city requirements for rezoning. I make a motion to recommend approval of Case PZ 16-12. Approval with Conditions: Based on the information presented, I find that the request conforms to the comprehensive land use plan and meets city requirements for rezoning, except for [list exception]. I make a motion to recommend approval the Case PZ 16-12 with the following conditions [list conditions]. Deny: Based on the information presented, I find that the proposed use does not conform to the comprehensive land use plan [or does not meet requirements for rezoning, state which one] and make a motion to deny Case PZ 16-12. • SOS Renovations LLC P.O. Box 591 Mansfield Tx 76063 Phone 817-477-3222 Fax 817-200-7565 SOSRenovationsLLC @gmail.com 8/12/2016 Dear City of Kennedale—Planning and Zoning, I am requesting a zoning change for the property located at 1115 Border Lane, Kennedale Tx. 76o6o from (AG) agricultural to (R3) single family residential. I am the sole owner of this 1.5 acre property and 1 acre of the property currently sits vacant. The current zoning for the property is (AG) agricultural. This is primarily due to the original land owner receiving that designation many years ago. Obviously, since that time the majority of lots and land that reside next to that location were sold and rezoned residential. Currently, (AG) agricultural zoning does not comply with the property or any resident near that location. Frankly, it will never be used for that purpose. The fut u VWb use of the property will be for single family residential usage. a r r s, J1JWeph W. Boston Jr for SOS Renovations LLC PETITION FOR CHANGE OF ZONING CLASSIFICATION ZONING CASE # (assigned by city staff) DATE: ) Z - 16 City Council City of Kennedale Kennedale, Texas 76060 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL: You are hereby respectfully requested to approve the following request for a change of zoning classification. I, the applicant, request to change the zoning classification of the property described on Exhibit "A" attached, from its current zoning classification of " ( 141✓' to that of 23 " ( �n�i�•p Pa**i114 654&b in its entirety as shown on Exhibit "B" attached. The property totals some j acres. A statement of why the zoning change should be approved is attached to this application. I understand that I must satisfy the Council that either the general welfare of all the city affected by the area to be changed will be enhanced, or that the property is unusable for the purposes allowed under existing zoning. Legal Description is hAL70- 44, 6a/& Suy ✓e-V, pbSff�� l T `T,•" /C of Present use of the property is yacu.4- I C4 Address of the property is / S 23crzoC e /-/V, keen e-d a k 72 -:710(Dd Property Owner's Name: J dScp/` S' /I (�4 SQS �P--'7CV'/ 101 Address: G /Ul/9rVs7Q/a9 Tx 0 413 Telephone Number: 9z 4 39 -:7-1o0 Applicant's Name: ��%� '-S � Address: 3 CAZ-Z-OW t/ L /V 7'rvy Z�e�W J�- Ztbo1� Telephone Number: Y%2�— 9-2 — If applicant is not the owner, an owner's affidavit must be submitted with this application. I, the applicant, understand that city staff, the Planning &Zoning Commission, or the City Council may request from me a site plan or other supporting documents concerning the nature, extent, and impact of my request for rezoning, in addition to what I supply with my application for a change in zoning. I further certify that —�0S 2e4,.,7a-,c,—f/ L C_ is the sole owner(s) of the property described in the legal description and shown in the map attached to this application, as of the date of this application. /Z /l / Applipant Signature Date Items to be submitted with this application: ❑ Owner affidavit (if applicant is not the property owner) ❑ Application fee ❑ Statement of why the zone change should be approved ❑ Map showing the property requested to be rezoned ❑ Legal description (metes and bounds) for the property to be rezoned. o If you do not have a current survey with a metes and bounds description, you may submit the most recent deed for the property if it includes a metes and bounds description. ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... M B � I CO g, I N 'tp x SIE6C��p5� Z�VNP R �• Ra j L� R a R R A :° e• R U dm AOOn 3'IOJ E` I ti EH a �bV a OOIle vy �\w�pP ^ -- nV 31NYD1'�Y' 2 d S •`•� _- ___ � -- I^I^� ?.° `[{•O IM _ � � _ W W F x RIR 1= R R Ic W ATR I C � N'IVn3A Y ek A9 m , �.. •3_ AQcv� R F U Q x l `�` R _ ^� „ ^ . I a g R ^ x c O nAM Y3W NMYd . ^ .LIB �s H I O 1p - .. s _ B � - �' -_- — -- - ------------- tI l R - ,°` TpW NQm n0UKd0A0YR5 -I .d 0 S nU dC38 ARYHS F N 9Q. I r=l--�_ 19 OA a --- ° a - _�_ � °ygo� � 'tA Y R� t` -E -In�,_ % � I z' '�ais`I -y e•^� o fa w C sluewuieAoE)jo younop sexeL lequeo UPON Loaf elep peod poulsip sieiddyjueaaelayj uroaj elep I(aepunoq laoae " Q T " e " " OO LU UJ UJ Q WILDCAT Ai LU " ® a� O " O - o w w J _ u Z m o k Lu (n X13 d000 a `& SHADY BEND ` w o O 0 m N m N Q m - -0 LiPt- � N 0 w .l3llIHM 0 0 " 0O m z a a a 0-Y E y _ Z a> v O LL m N O m Y �Z�so a D Q m m o c O M 0 0 N 0 N Q _ Q 2 m z 5 c / o 100HOS 31llll sluewuieAoE)jo younoo sexeL lequeo UPON LuoiJ elep peod joujs!p les.ieiddy jueoeLegj woij elep Ifiepunoq le ie a a U a a i I aaaaaaaa a' a MOCIV3N NMd3 a �a a alma L< a a a I- �i w W UJa a a _a W a a - �/a r S--i a > a > a a U) �tij a W a a a s a a J LU O a ur a a a Q V� J� Of a a d a s d a a O Q a a a a s Q a Z a 0 a a a W a _a aI Iaaaala Q Ya 0 a a aaaaa a lv 1`dOaIIM bfJ a a r� U � a �O a a a a S2J3HimjvO LL a a a a a a a 4� �13d000 � a a a a a a a a s a a a l a a a a a a < o m '� a a a a a a F< SHADY BEND ;- a a.l0f a a ct a �- a a o GV - a W a a a a a a s a) a a a a a a a a -2 a a u� CO a a a m a a a a a < a a F a a a a a a a a s s a a W A3llIHM a a a) N Z N U a a a a a a a a �_ p (� o a C Lal a a a a a U Q La 0 <= v a ; a c� _ Z a n a U) .' a a U — a —r a a —i o T +J a) N a a a/ a a a +) 0 O W a a a O to a a—t a Y a� a a U (0 � o a J � a ? a a a a 0 a - (� N� a a � a a a U a)Q I a a a a a M o a U) a T- < U a a a O L IOOHOS 3lllll z STATE USE CODES A RESIDENTIAL F COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL Al Single-Family F1 Commercial A2 Mobile Homes F2 Industrial A3 Condominiums F3 Billboards A4 Townhomes A5 Planned Unit Development (PUD) G OIL/GAS/MINERAL RESERVES A9 Interim use IG11 Oil/Gas/Mineral Reserves B RESIDENTIAL J UTILITIES B1 Multi-Family J1 Water Systems B2 Duplex J2 Gas Companies B3 Triplex J3 Electric Companies B4 Quadraplex J4 Telephone Companies J5 Railroads C VACANT PLATTED LOTS/TRACTS J6 Pipelines C1 Residential J7 Cable Companies C2 Commercial J8 Other C3 Rural C6 Vacant Exempt (Right-of-Way) L COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL L1 Commercial BPP D ACREAGE L2 Industrial BPP D1 Ranch Land D2 Timberland M MOBILE HOMES D3 Farmland M2 Private Aircraft D4 Undeveloped M3 Mobile Home M4 Other Tangible PP E FARM/RANCH E1 House + Limited Acres O RESIDENTIAL INVENTORY E2 Mobile Home + Limited Acres 01 Vacant E3 Other Improvements 02 Improved Standard Distribution Data, 2013 Appendix C ORDINANCE 609 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 40, AS AMENDED, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KENNEDALE, TEXAS BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF KENNEDALE FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO "R-2" and "R-3" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REFLECT SUCH CHANGES; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Kennedale, Texas is a Home Rule municipality acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has adopted a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential, or other purposes, for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, SOS Renovations, having a proprietary interest in the property described below, has requested a zoning change as described below; AND WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the current Agricultural zoning designation is no longer suitable for said property, given the character of surrounding development; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly held by the Planning & Zoning Commission on the 20th day of October 2016 and by the City Council of the City of Kennedale on the 21st day of November 2016 with respect to the zoning changes described herein; and WHEREAS, all requirements of law dealing with notice to other property owners, publication and all procedural requirements have been complied with in accordance with Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council does hereby deem it advisable and in the public interest to amend the City's Zoning Ordinance as described herein. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENNEDALE, TEXAS: 1 SECTION 1: The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended so that the zoning classification and the uses in the hereinafter described area shall be changed and or restricted as shown and described below: The south half-acre of an approximately 1.5-acre tract in the W. E. Haltom Survey, Tarrant County, Texas, being that same property conveyed by Warranty Deed from Donna Kay Geter to SOS Renovations LLC, instrument number D213282537 ("the Property"), more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural zoning district to "R-2" Single family residential, and the remained from "AG" Agricultural zoning district to "R-3" Single family residential district. SECTION 2. The zoning districts and boundaries as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. They have been designed to lessen congestion in the streets, to secure safety from fire, panic, flood and other dangers, to provide adequate light and air, to prevent overcrowding of land, to avoid undue concentration of population, to facilitate the adequate provisions of transportation, water, sewerage, parks and other public requirements. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of the buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 3. The City Secretary is hereby directed to amend the official zoning map to reflect the changes in classifications approved herein. SECTION 4. The use of the properties hereinabove described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances of the City of Kennedale, Texas. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances and of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Kennedale, Texas (1991), as amended, including but not limited to all Ordinances of the City of Kennedale affecting zoning and land use, and shall not repeal any of the provisions of such ordinances except in those instances where provisions of such ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. 2 SECTION 6. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 7. All rights or remedies of the City of Kennedale Texas are expressly saved as to any and all violations of any ordinances governing zoning or of any amendments thereto that have accrued at the time of the effective date of this Ordinance and as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation both civil and criminal same shall not be affected by this Ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the Courts. SECTION 8. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases clauses sentences paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable and if any phrase clause sentence paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases clauses sentences paragraphs and sections of this ordinance since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase clause sentence paragraph or section. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Kennedale is hereby directed to publish the caption, Section 1, penalty clause, publication clause and effective date clause of this ordinance in every issue of the official newspaper of the City of Kennedale for two days or one issue of the newspaper if the official newspaper is a weekly newspaper as authorized by Section 3.10 of the City of Kennedale Charter. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016. Mayor, Brian Johnson 3 ATTEST: City Secretary, Leslie Galloway EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney, Wayne K. Olson 4 Exhibit "A" Legal Description Metes and Bounds Description Attached as Exhibit A to Warranty Deed Filed in Tarrant County, Texas, D206017824 5 Page 3 of 4 ATTACHMENT A TR I ein at certain lot,tract or parcel of land located in the W.E. HALTOM SURVEY ABSTRACT 1 arr t County,Texas and being the same land described in Deed to Thurman R. Henry nd . ra Henry, recorded in Volume 4051, Page 444, Deed Records,Tarrant County, x an in ore particularly described as follows: The ce ort deg. in. 17 sec. West, along the said common line of the W.E. Haltom Survey,Ab act a E. Haltom Survey,Abstract 1791, a distance of the 114.69 feet to a % in me iron t at the most Southernly Southeast corner of a tract of land described in ed t e d and Wife, Penny L. Floyd, recorded in Volume 13154, Page 409, Deed Re tls rra County,Texas; THENCE North,a t ce 8. feet to a 3/8 inch diameter iron rod found at the "ell" corner of said Floyd t a THENCE South 89 deg.57mi se , a distance of 114.69 feet to a% inch diameter rod with plastic cap stamped : the most Northerly Southeast corner of said Floyd tract,said point being in the est fix o sai Lo , lock 1, K.I.S.D.Addition; THENCE South (basis of bearing d i m rementioned Deed to Henry), along the West line of said Lot 1, Block 1, KISD,Addi on, istance of 0 feet to the PLACE of BEGINNING and containing 1.500 acres of land. TRACT 11 Easement estate from Merle M. Caruthers an ife . Caruthers to Thurman R. Henry and wife, Barbara Henry in deed recorded in Volume 05 e 47, Deed Records,Tarrant County,Texas,described as follows: BEGINNING at a point 171.7 feet E. and 2640 feet S.of the c r o said Haltom Survey, thence East 50 feet; THENCE N 568.17 feet to a point for corner; THENCE West 50 feet to a pin for corner; THENCE South 568.17 feet to the Point of Beginning A.P.N. 04469569 Rt N N rl m M 00 00 00 00 00 c-1 Q M c-I c-I lO Rt c-I M r, r, r, r, r, N 00 00 00 Rt N 00 Ol Rt Rt Rt Rt Rt 00 N Ln Ln Ln N Ln N Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln LI c 3 O CL O O O O O O �O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LI tO tO tO tO tO tO tO tO tO to tO tO tO tO c 3 O X X X X X X X X X X X X X 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 I a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) -a -a -a -a -a -0 0 a) a) a) a) a) a) 0.0 a) a) a) a) a) a) a) 3 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c O c c c c c c c c c c c c c tin (1) (1) a) a) a) a) L a) a) a) a) a) a) a) c Q O N a) +, N L a) O Q Qa) c LI j a) O c J J J J a) a) a) a) a) a) 4- 3 L L Q' L C: CD CD CD CD CD CD a) O a) a) U a) c L Q Q �O '� Q c O O O R O O m O O x O Ln U U O U 00 N N N N N N Ln c-1 O lO m Ln c-1 O O 00 to -:i- N O c-1 c-1 N c-1 O O N lD c-1 O O O O O c-1 s c-1 lO lO I a Rt l0 M 1 00 00 00 00 00 00 r1 a-+ •3 a) � � U Q L O LL L a a)I H C z O s a) C: s c 3 c °o 06 s O o E J s E c ° E L S U c (6 +1 � (6 N ° O h U a Q cm Y a-+ ru U J J � OI C: m O D -0 a) z c l 0 Y N C: Ln m +, O a) aci a) s o o U = Lon � m � U � ° O mL m a � 'Ln (7 co es r Ln _ IA f OJ Ir[ { OJ Q6 aj ti y _ w' y _ •:�$ _ n yy e•�� o, qr or CD T ' �'�r1 I Co Ln LO_ m } I i + A FFF yh c. - i 1 PW •� a ., � e a- r N � o_ -- � RN s Q . `ti _0 jj �-- ca W co LL Lu uj ILA oil a--+ LJ b � ,r �.� W NJ WW, ia=CD L Ir w . w THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Jerry J.Floyd and Penny L.Floyd are the owners of Lot 3,Block 1,Floyd Addition in the W.E. Haltom Survey,Abstract 731 in Tarrant County,Texas,as shown on the plat,recorded in Cabinet A,Slide 4844 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas,do hereby declare such property bound by the hereinafter set out restrictions and covenants and agree that said purchasers and subsequent -- owners of said lots or parts thereof shall comply with same.These covenants are to run with the land and shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under them for two years from the date that these covenants are recorded,after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended until the use of this water well as a source of water for a public water system ceases. Enforcement shall be by proceedings at law or in equity against any person or persons violating or attempting to violate any covenant either to restrain violation or to recover damages. Invalidation of any one of these covenants by judgement or court order shall not in any way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. Such restrictions are as follows,to wit: 1. Sanitation control upon all of that area of land included within a 150 foot radius of a proposed deep water well as shown on Exhibit "A" of this easement and specifically prohibiting the construction and/or operation of underground petrochemical storage tanks, stock pens,feed lots,dump grounds,privies,cesspools,septic tank drainfields,drilling of improperly constructed water wells of any depth and all other construction or operation that could create an insanitary condition within,upon or across the above described tract of land; 2. Tile or concrete sanitary sewers, sewer appurtenances, septic tanks and storm sewers are specifically prohibited within a 50 foot radius of the deep water well described and located above. 3. This sanitation control permits the construction of homes or buildings upon same,provided, however,that all underground petrochemical storage tanks,stock pens,feed lots,privies,tile or concrete sanitation sewers,cesspools,septic tanks,storm sewers,septic tank drainfields, drilling of improperly constructed wells of any depth and other construction and/or operations that could create an insanitary condition within, upon or across same are specifically prohibited within the designated distances. 4. Normal farming and ranching operations are permitted except that livestock shall not be allowed within 50 feet of the proposed well. 5. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said owners have executed this instrument this ---f day of J to Penny Ri y Floyd THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared _ J-c z - 1py FLoyA PEMOY Z r,air known to me to be the person(s)whose name(s)are subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that the(he/she)executed the same for the purpose and consideration therein expressed. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE,this the day of 19 . �# IG4THEROIE A.TURNER � ,� F MY COhIMISSION IXPIRES F �� ,- Notary Public in and for County,Texas Recorded at Courthouse, ,Texas on AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE CITY OF KENNNEDALE P.O. BOX 268 KENNEDALE, TEXAS 76060-0268 EXHIBIT A SANITARY CONTROL EASEMENT PUBLIC WATER WELL CITY OF KENNEDALE,TRINITY WELL No. 4 BORDER STREET SITE MARCH 30,1999 PROJECT No.015-503 BORDER LANE 50' R.0.W.) 8 89°59' C"VV 5/8' IRON ROD /f '7n.'-3' IRON ROD —W -- W -- I -- -- — S 89'5-9'05"W S In IRON RODI ( j FUTURE � x� I� 00,000 GAL. T (� I TANK I z FOUR O.A rS .00N S.4ALANIE 1Ma11v`4G�INGr?3RTNERI LO ➢OL Lr IE 1.7;SO-PG.004 7j TRACT CT .1"Al, I / ABSTWACT 707 J/J ZONED R 1 ti PROPOSED 1 J 50C,00C GAL. I ` O TANK x PROPOSED 350 G.P.M. �* DEEP WATER WELL 4�30 I I I�ENNEDALE HIGH SCHOOL t � \ LOT 4 BLOCK -i law IYS10.ADDITION RECORDED IN C-IBINET A, ,I;LJDc o'6i L T.$RRANT COU_VTI' PLAT RECORDS EAST 764.68' / 7 PROPOSED SANITARY CONTROL EASEMENT AREA - 4,784 S.F. (0.110 AC.) FLOYD ADDITION LOT v',BLOCK 7 RECORDED IN CAB]NET A, .SLIDE CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES SCALE:1" 50' 7A)?RANT COUNT' 1601 E.LAMAR BLVD SUITE 200 PLAY, RECORDS ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76011 g�\015-503\503-exhc3.dgn (817) 548-0696 Metro (817)265-8836 D199103805 CITY OF KENNEDALE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE P 0 BOX 268 KENNEDALE TX 76060 -W A R N I N G-THIS IS PART OF THE OFFICIAL RECORD--D O N 0 T D E S T R O Y I N D E X E D -- T A R R A N T C O U N T Y T E X A S S U Z A N N E H E N D E R S 0 N -- COUNTY CLERK O F F I C I A L R E C E I P T T 0: CITY OF KENNEDALE RECEIPT NO REGISTER RECD-BY PRINTED DATE TIME 199231293 DR96 A I 04/26/1999 09:29 INSTRUMENT FEECD INDEXED TIME 1 D199103805 WD 19990426 09:29 CK 34651* T 0 T A L : DOCUMENTS: 01 F E E S: 13.00 B Y: ANY PROVISION WHICH RESTRICTS THE SALE RENTAL OR USE OF THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY BECAUSE OF COLOR OR RACE IS INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE UNDER FEDERAL LAW. PZ 16-12 Looking at the property, facing east (high school facility shown in the background) a, y �At t PZ 16-12 Looking - property, north CO , O N �• O \ O O L �7 ,. � .j x ti i.fir: ••i "� f# jj � ry s k ' �!ar s10- a -,�°• .i..� � . __'-•1111 a ! f � � s •.. r 1 • 1 ' Y -mil: ,r - • '� PZ 16-12 Facing southwest, showing the closest intersection to the property (Border Lane and Coopers Lane) • � l )c KENNEDALE Planning Department www.cityofkenneda le.co m Date: November 17, 2016 Agenda Item No: REGULAR ITEMS (B) I. SUBJECT CASE # PZ 16-14 Public hearing and consideration of Ordinance approval regarding a request by Joyce Stanton for Re-platting of 1399 J R Hawkins Rd., legal description of Falcon Wood Estates Section One, Block 1, Lot 17, Kennedale, Tarrant County, Texas. The replat would create Lots 17R-A and 17 R-B. II. SUMMARY BACKGROUND OVERVIEW Request Replat one lot into two lots Applicant Joyce Stanton, representing the property owner Location Falcon Wood subdivision off Swiney Hiett and Eden Rds Surrounding Uses Primarily single-family residential Surrounding Zoning R-1 and R-3 single-family residential, Manufactured Home, Agricultural Future Land Use Plan Designation Parks / open space due to floodplain Staff Recommendation Approve CURRENT STATUS OF • This property is 9.025 acres in size and is zoned R-1 single family residential. It was originally created to serve as a drainage and 100-year floodplain easement for the Falcon Wood subdivision, although it was also designed to leave room for one (1) one-acre pad site for a house outside of the drainage easement and floodplain. An amending plat for this property was approved earlier this year to amend the boundaries of the floodplain drainage easement. Prior to approving the amending plat, the city required the applicant to submit a new floodplain study, which was reviewed by the city's engineers. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES & NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD Most of the properties in the area are single family residential, although there are a few commercial properties in the vicinity. The lot is within the Falcon Wood Estates subdivision, a large-lot single 405 Municipal Drive, Kennedale, TX 76060 1 Telephone: 817-985-Z 135 1 Fax: 817-483-0812 family residential neighborhood. Across Swiney Hiett to the north are mostly single family residences developed before the Falcon Wood subdivision was built. STAFF REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Property is designated as Parks / Open Space in the Future Land Use Plan due to floodplain The area is designated as Parks / Open Space due to the floodplain on the property. However, the properties outside the floodplain may be developed as residential if the open space character is preserved. In this case, the lots would be 3.29 and 5.53 acres, and a large portion of each property is still reserved as a 100-year floodplain/drainage easement, so the open space character would be retained. The adjacent residential lots within Falcon Crest are designated as Neighborhood in the Future Land Use Plan. SUMMARY The replat conforms to the comprehensive land use plan. CITY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS Plats must comply with the city's technical requirements in order to be approved. PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS The replat meets the city's public works and engineering requirements. PLANNING REQUIREMENTS The plat drawing meets the technical requirements for plat drawings. FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS The fire chief has reviewed the plat drawing and has no concerns. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, staff recommends approval of the replat. ADDITIONAL FACTORS TO CONSIDER. By state law, if a variance is requested for a replat and the variance is protested by a certain percentage of property owners* within the same subdivision (Falcon Wood), then the replat can only be approved with a supermajority vote. There are no variances requested for this replat. * Owners of at least 20 percent of the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed replat and extending 200 feet from that area. ACTION • NING COMMISION Sample motions are provided below (you are not required to use the examples). Approval: Based on the information presented, I find that the replat meets city requirements for plats and conforms to the comprehensive land use plan. I make a motion to approve the replat. Approval with Conditions: Based on the information presented, I find that the replat conforms to the comprehensive land use plan and meets city requirements except for [state what/how the plat doesn't meet requirements] and make a motion to approve the replat with the following conditions [list conditions]. Deny: Based on the information presented, I find that the proposed replat does not meet [list standards or requirements not met] and make a motion to deny the replat. M (O y� w 2 �N � � r Q r �O�N N ��N tcn Cfl M w > ai N cn m Z) E m N = G1 L) L Q� :t:! cu w M U m Q O Q O O 7 7 cu Z N M M N O C z �r N a) � ' Q E c z r-4 m a Cl) Y N A %+4 m N m Q M M v /O m C° Cf M Q i \✓ 3 M � i(J 0i O m Cf H O Cf �J 4 7 � W O w p w O v>o Oz!r° cn z in in ON,` r � N o � �1332iO �—+ M NOOI V-1 Q� Nro r o rn o w N a 0 z m 0 w p N LO � Z ao r M N M v w \w / N O p Z Q a OE _ N Cf , " a O 0 3NIiJJ3b3d ~° w cn 0 U) V. 0 a� J ~ O w Q V N N. 0 rn J Z 0 � ro ti 0 o Q doom Xo=l M C O O w N Of 0 [D N N � N � M � O v � H r W m N N U i cu `a +- U Q m Q a^) Q cu cu O CL M M (O M E cn 0] r ¢ a M. K � H H V/ m K M s VJ m M M H M ;'-L %+4 H f Z y � W .� w o 700) .& o 0 z z 2 2 N EE U 1� �2 O LLI W paoi Z p /! z2 aP m = s DNI2JSG ]Dd w �� s'cn m C� 2� a ° O U) D iA LL 0 � p 1 � cl p H M �O O O N m � z , � x cn & � ` ` \ FZ f § u k k @ § cu ® J a) � � ■ cu ƒ k � ° $ @ U \ » \ @ k g 5 k § / cu f 2 ƒ > ƒ 3 3 / �14~ Cl) � / '� , ��{� q 7� _ Df | Of � 2 . S u ¥ � 0 --7,�� m 2 j %-�� Y) / ! / ƒ 0 ¥ e Q � [ )433§0 NOO]V< ~ ^ ± LO \ \ 7 2 } , n 2 Z e � \ GOOM XO] _ , o Future Lan `Use Map for FZ 16- 14 1 1 r Man Villiazie 2149 qEY HI HT ®r LQC N VI F.VV _ 1. • <m,' 1 '°. f "1 �L'"1rLJ i 41 pen space p°^ ' i •fMli Ali 0 k°: � 34 r� 1 .1 rf LU - 1 °, ` � 4 ,... °. � .•. �•r F y. �; .• ° 1. e,.: �- .•° i 1 INTO o�"� � ` LC .. _ :;•gin_ �.�— ° ZCONI 1I _ L 2123 r 1 City of Kennedale Re-Plat Application i APPLICANT NAME: Joyce Stanton DATE: September 23, 2016 PROPOSED SUB-DIVISION NAME: Lot 17R-A& 17R-B, Bilk 1, Falcon Wood Estates, Phase One CURRENT LEGAL. DESCRIPTION: Lot 17R, Blk 1, Falcon Woods Estates, Phase One ACRES: 9.025 CURRENT ZONING: R1 PROPOSED ZONING: R1 BEING PLATTED AS: LOTS- 2 BLOCKS: PHASES: 1 OWNER OF RECORD: 64-ACRE JOINT VENTURE(Contact: Ralph Shelton) MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 171199 PHONE: 817-366-1376 EM.A.IL.'(aptignal): ralph-sheiton @sbcglobal.net CITY: Arlington STATE: Texas ZIP: 76003 I I SURVEYOR: Joyce Stanton j MAILING ADDRESS: 908 West Main Street PHONE: 817-275-3361 EMAIL(optional): jstanton @dterry.com CITY: Arlington STATE: Texas ZIP: 76013 ENGINEER:_ MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL(optional): CITY: STATE: ZIP: I f DEVELOPER: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL(optional): CITY: STATE: ZIP: Who is the primary contact for questions or comments from city staff regarding this plat application? NAME: Joyce Stanton I I i I i rev.7 24.2015 rr I I I i Please provide below(or on an attached page)a description of the project for which the plat is sought. Include proposed land uses and their locations. The purpose of this plat is to divide the current Lot 17R, Block 1, Falcon Wood Estates, Phase One into two lots. i i I I 3 E APPLICANT SIGNATURE: DATE: OWNER SIGNATURE: DATE: I. SURVEYOR SIGNATUR DATE: ENGINEER SIGNATURE: DATE: DEVELOPER SIGNATURE: DATE: I i i 3 E i .......................................................................................................................................................... For Office Use Only: Date Received: Reviewed by: i ❑ Community Development Director (initial after review) ❑ Public Works Director (initial after review) ❑ Fire Chief (initial after review) ❑ Other Staff, as needed (initial after review) ................................................................. 1 i rev.7.24.2015 rr A ;g ,,/;IA ; a$ A a ° P a m I ' !!!!��/... uuu��eeegqu/qqqaaaaa�E��Egqqqq°dA�Nu / �II � S E s�su�o oN - sg N s � L� �/ e � sevso e5$ 'nNA np6o�sNm �- (.6 R v ) fl}__ j_ "a e g A `a a e u 3 g$RR a u A ° F aey Am & I �° "S—q EL A a 2 n3 °s gad =sJ---�--_ —mss V� � 31 v X30 a o �mI 1 ee I _ N vat m BE IE It A COMMON AREA a �y I 'a'�-. __._._ I I cl tt Of NENNEDRIE o z 111 — 1 B -I IN,,5E-A 0 88=8 s . scm unur - w LINE r.♦ o m / CIW Dr ML-11 P 1715,- � a - 9 � I s I I � — aim I P4 � _ a I I m§ I I a� e> n° ° ° x �=sx 6 n e g 15 Ia o y N o u r o 2 r7 yeso � � m Ln ° A - )c KENNEDALE Planning and Zoning Commission www.cityofkennedale.com STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date: November 17, 2016 Agenda Item No: REGULAR ITEMS (C) I. SUBJECT CASE # PZ 16-15 Public hearing and consideration of a request by the Kennedale Economic Development Corporation for re-platting of Block 5, Lots 1-6 and 12-16, Oak Crest Addition, Kennedale, Tarrant County, Texas. The replat would create Lots 1 R and 6R, Block 5. II. SUMMARY N BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW Request Replat Applicant Kennedale Economic Development Corporation Location Oak Crest at High Ridge and Link St Surrounding Uses Commercial and residential Surrounding Zoning C-1, R-3, EC, PD (QT); Commercial Corridor overlay Future Land Use Plan Designation Employment Center Staff Recommendation approve CURRENT STATUS OF • . The property has been acquired by the Kennedale Economic Development Corporation and cleared as part of KEDC's economic development program. As the next step in its redevelopment efforts for this area, the KEDC would like to create one large lot (essentially) to facilitate selling and developing the property. The property is currently vacant. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES & NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND NEIGHBORHOOD The area has a mix of uses and zoning. On the east side are PD and Employment Center zoning districts, with gas station / convenience store and drive-through restaurant land uses. To the west are C-1 restricted commercial and R-3 single family residential zoning with commercial and residential land uses, and immediately to the south is R-3 (see attached map). This neighborhood was originally platted in the 1940s and has seen a lot of transition of the years, including changing from primarily residential into a freeway-adjacent mix of commercial, light industrial, and residential uses. Link St was recently extended and now bisects Block 5. PLATTING HISTORY The property was originally platted in 1947 as approximately quarter-acre residential lots. The properties in question have not been replatted since that time and were until recently under separate ownership. STAFF REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The property is designated as Employment Center in the Future Land Use Plan. The comprehensive plan shows this area as Employment Center. The Employment Center district is designed for a major office development for corporate headquarters or multiple smaller offices. The plan notes that ideally a mix of land uses—including office and retail—would occupy this site, with an emphasis on employment. SUMMARY The replat conforms to the comprehensive land use plan. CITY DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS Plats must comply with the city's technical requirements in order to be approved. PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS The plat meets public works and engineering requirements for plats. PLANNING REQUIREMENTS The plat meets technical requirements for plat drawings. FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS The fire chief has reviewed the plat drawing and has no concerns. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, staff recommends approval of the replat. ADDITIONAL FACTORS TO CONSIDER. By state law, if a variance is requested for a replat and the variance is protested by a certain percentage of property owners* within the same subdivision (Oak Crest), then the replat can only be approved with a supermajority vote. There are no variances requested for this replat. * Owners of at least 20 percent of the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed replat and extending 200 feet from that area. ACTION • NING COMMISION Sample motions are provided below (you are not required to use these examples). Approval: Based on the information presented, I find the replat meets city requirements for plats and conforms to the comprehensive land use plan. I make a motion to approve the replat. Approval with Conditions: Based on the information presented, I find the replat conforms to the comprehensive land use plan and meets city requirements except for [state what/how the plat doesn't meet requirements] and make a motion to approve the replat with the following conditions [list conditions]. Deny: Based on the information presented, I find that the proposed replat does not meet [list standards or requirements not met] and make a motion to deny the replat. D N Q w o U U U1 N L y � C 0 N � � a Y 10��P� � j 5�&o Abp c� QP LO / E L OD 0 wC o N W r Q i 00 2 � V LO N M Q-+ can) o N N u N < !.� O 4-4 W V I r N N N G mil/ (O L N N r� d N V 7 i G ^^ N LLNDALE, � U Q� co 0) o M U) N L N CJ� o U 0EI o �°0 z° 0) O O a, m U) c o �a m 0 d U N M V U) 00 0) o N N NIO �Z, ® rZ LO LL rt, 4ir -� Lo Lo i M y Lo .. _ N Alp �. "t v co 1:1 LL a C) _ a) i r-' C ) N LO J Lr) O Q � U F N co • o P U LO LO Q P��QP w � °' b0 OD d' 0 o N W Q ( 1� 00 .�- �� W ¢O pp11 cq O Q V A� LO % 0 LO cn �"' c `' CF) 4� Q ��OP yO m O LO N N N w � �9L Q p QT N O (O LO N N O N N LL Q �O m r—+ LIND ALE N F-1 0 M o co co a co °r r- m V c L— U L ch > o L Q L co Lo N co N N CO 21) O V +�-� co MN Y Q U ci I ii O D Q a z PACIFIC LN�lN TR -� Y cu qu f C �. MOO " � '5•L L, 7 y K i - --- - - ---- -------------------------- - - .-...... .............. ........ -: City of Kennedale j Re-Plat Application APPLICANT NAME: KEDC DATE: I p PROPOSED SUB-DIVISION NAME: CURRENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION: dock 5 � 1'tc �o�-lfaDak �' �d lddn ACRES: a . 9� CURRENT ZONING: C-i OVA PROPOSED ZONING: BEING PLATTED AS: LOTS: 1 (2- BLOCKS: 52 "1 PHASES: I �2 5 I OWNER OF RECORD: K E D C MAILING ADDRESS 4D5 M ufni Ge K2YlYlf c Ct�e PHONE: '6 EMAIL(optlonai): hhQ, l+@ 0,4u CF e"nedo-k- Com CITY: STATE ZIP: SURVEYOR: Sh ei d E nG iyA eeti MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL(optional): CITY: STATE: ZIP: ENGINEER: [ MAILING ADDRESS:'' PHONE: EMAIL(optional): CITY: STATE: ZIP: DEVELOPER: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE: EMAIL(optional): CITY: STATE: ZIP: Who is the primary contact for questions or comments from city staff regarding this plat application? NAME: E i t 1 rep.7.24.2015 rr i Please provide below(or on an attached page)a description of the project for which the plat is sought. Include proposed land uses and their locations. ecflnorvl;c &ve-Looment I i APPLICANT SIGNATURE: Q DATE: is 1% 1 io OWNER SIGNATURE: DATE: ID . I`� I� -- SURVEYOR SIGNATURE: DATE: I i ENGINEER SIGNATURE: DATE: DEVELOPER SIGNATURE: DATE: i l �4 E I I i i E I ........................................................................................................................................................ For Office Use Only: Date Received: Reviewed by: 1 ❑ Community Development Director (initial after review) ❑ Public Works Director (initial after review) ❑ Fire Chief (initial after review) ❑ Other Staff, as needed (initial after review) ............................................................................................................................................................... s rev.7.24.2015 rr aa¢i K �o w X> U [� U � W O O W ° 6WM WM 11104 o^�=QzNO� Q U a ; I❑a>Ao � m� oo�a� Fa O zzz z Y o oo F °b3o° 5a - •" _ Boa, U §E6 °� 4°°� xE'ee yos ogfi ?g -- - 0 poll G3 Rom B y?k q S - �SEfre w°gP cos S. lag "I oiu\ - a°° Yps Y°\ 3 ° Y" z P d�a "x _ _ - m�� aR�$ua='iz � - - - "e-%os�°' °sY SE Rm� - U - ❑ e§ \ J 5§'"�yi mkY �9�goS+ s$mR".. /� sz � / o�•` od og�,�i „a - �2aR own p ONE Ems ®g6 All v,tN po=4o0y o �d Gam �"LW 2"',^,,�� e /� �/ e ems.. 3g� ❑ M v o