2015_07.07 BOA Packet ic
KENNEDALE
Board of Adjustment
www.cityofkennedale.com
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
July 7, 2015
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 405 MUNICIPAL DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. SWEARING IN OF SPEAKERS
IV. MINUTES APPROVAL
A. Consider approval of minutes from June 2, 2015 Board of Adjustment meeting.
V.VISITOR/CITIZENS FORUM
At this time, any person with business before the Board of Adjustment not scheduled on the Agenda
may speak to the Board, provided that an official `Speaker's Request Form' has been completed and
submitted to the Board Secretary prior to the start of the meeting. All comments must be directed
towards the Chair, rather than individual board members or staff. All speakers must limit their
comments to the subject matter as listed on the `Speaker's Request Form.' No formal action can be
taken on these items.
VI. REGULAR ITEMS
A. CASE # BOA 15-01 to receive comments and consider action on a request by Anthony Taiwo for
a variance to City Code Section 17-405 Zoning Districts Generally, sub-section (d)(j), requiring a
swimming pool to be located at least eight feet from the main building. The variance is requested for
305 Autumnwood Ct, more particularly described as Winding Creek Estates Block 1 Lot 15.
VII. REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Kennedale will provide for reasonable
accommodations for persons attending City Council meetings. This building is wheelchair accessible, and parking
spaces for disabled citizens are available. Requests for sign interpreter services must be made forty-eight(48) hours
prior to the meetings. Please contact the City Secretary at 817.985.2104 or(TDD) 1.800.735.2989
CERTIFICATION
l certify that a copy of the July 7, 2015, Board of Adjustment &Building Board of Appeals agenda was posted on the
City Hall bulletin board next to the main entrance of the City Hall building, 405 Municipal Drive, of the City of
Kennedale, Texas, in a place convenient and readily accessible to the general public at all times and said agenda
was posted at least 72 hours preceding the schedule time of said meeting, in accordance with Chapter 551 of the
Texas Government Code.
ace o e s, oar ecre ary
KENNEDALE
Board of Adjustment STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Date: July 7, 2015
Agenda Item No: MINUTES APPROVAL - A.
I. Subject:
Consider approval of minutes from June 2, 2015 Board of Adjustment meeting.
II. Originated by:
Katherine Rountree, Permits Clerk
III. Summary:
Minute's approval for June 2, 2015
IV. Recommendation:
Approve
V. Alternative Actions:
VI. Attachments:
1. 106.02.2015 minutes 106 02 2015 BOA Minutes Final.doc
ic
KENNEDALE
Board of Adjustment
www.cityofi(ennedale.com
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
June 2, 2015
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 405 MUNICIPAL DRIVE
REGULAR SESSION - 7:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mr. Vader called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
II. ROLL CALL
Present? Commissioner
Rick Adams
X Brian Cassady
X Jeff Madrid
X Patrick Vader
Martin Young
Alternates
X Jeff Nevarez
X Lana Sather
Vacant
A quorum was present.
Ms. Sather& Mr. Nevarez were asked to join the board as regular members.
Staff present: Rachel Roberts (city planner); Katherine Rountree (board secretary).
III. SWEARING IN OF SPEAKERS
Ms. Roberts swore in those who wished to speak.
IV. MINUTES APPROVAL
A. Review and consider approval of Minutes from the May 5, 2015 Board of Adjustment meeting
Mr. Madrid motioned to approve the minutes. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassady and passed with
all in favor.
V. VISITOR/CITIZENS FORUM
No one registered to speak.
VI. REGULAR ITEMS
A. CASE# BOA 15-04 to receive comments and consider action on a request by Jose Jaime for a special
exception as required by the City Code Section 17-421, Schedule of uses and off-street parking
requirements, to allow a salvage yard in an "I" Industrial zoning district at 6940 E Kennedale Pkwy, more
particularly described as W H Hudson Block Lot 1.
1. Staff presentation
Ms. Roberts stated that the board may already have enough information for the case since they heard the
case last year. She said the board may postpone the case if the applicant doesn't provide enough
information. She went over the minimum standards that are required to be met and said that there haven't
been any complaints made to the city to her knowledge.
2. Applicant presentation
Jose Jaime, 819 Shady Creek, said that any work that has been made on the cars located on the
property has been done inside of the main building. He said that he has consecutive inspections done to
his building to make sure that he is handling all the chemicals safely that are being stored and that they
are disposed of properly. He said he gets water testing done as well. He said that if he needs to put in a
fire lane then he will do that.
3. Public hearing
No one registered to speak.
4. Applicant response
No one registered to speak.
5. Staff response and summary.
Staff recommends that the board approve with conditions:
1. The special exception shall be granted for a maximum of 4 years, to expire in May 2019.
2. The applicant shall submit a site plan to the city, subject to review and approval of city staff,
designating fire lanes meeting city standards.
3. The fire lanes be paved (asphalt or concrete)within six (6) months from the date the special
exception is granted.
4. Outdoor storage areas must be maintained in good condition, with adequate gravel fill in place
at all times.
5. No outdoor storage shall be permitted on grass or other areas that are unpaved or without
gravel.
6. Any heavy-duty equipment or other equipment that may create loud noises shall be prohibited
from use before 8 AM or after 8 PM.
6. Action by the Board of Adjustment
Mr. Madrid made a motion to approve the special exception with the following conditions.
1. The special exception shall be granted for a maximum of 1 year, to expire in May 2016.
2. The applicant shall submit a site plan to the city, subject to review and approval of city staff,
designating fire lanes meeting city standards.
3. The fire lanes be paved (asphalt or concrete)within six (6) months from the date the special
exception is granted.
4. Outdoor storage areas must be maintained in good condition, with adequate gravel fill in place
at all times.
5. No outdoor storage shall be permitted on grass or other areas that are unpaved or without
gravel.
6. Any heavy-duty equipment or other equipment that may create loud noises shall be prohibited
from use before 8 AM or after 8 PM.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassady and passed with all in favor.
VII. REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS
The City Wide Cleanup was postponed to Saturday June 6 from 8 AM to 12 PM.
City hall will be closed July 4t"
The Board of Adjustments Commission will have their next meeting in July.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Madrid motioned to adjourn. The motion was seconded by Mr. Nevarez and passed with all in favor.
The meeting adjourned at 7:36 PM.
KENNEDALE
Board of Adjustment STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Date: July 7, 2015
Agenda Item No: REGULAR ITEMS - A.
I. Subject:
CASE # BOA 15-01 to receive comments and consider action on a request by Anthony Taiwo for a
variance to City Code Section 17-405 Zoning Districts Generally, sub-section (d)(j), requiring a
swimming pool to be located at least eight feet from the main building. The variance is requested for
305 Autumnwood Ct, more particularly described as Winding Creek Estates Block 1 Lot 15.
II. Originated by:
Rachel Roberts, City Planner
III. Summary:
Applicant: Anthony Taiwo and Wilma Rivera, home owners
Location: 305 Autumnwood Ct
Request: variance from City Code Section 17-405 Zoning Districts Generally, sub-section (d)(j), to
allow a swimming pool to be built closer than 8 feet to a house
Affected residents, property owners, or other stakeholders: residents of the Winding Creek
neighborhood; KISD (owns property behind the Taiwo/Rivera residence; not expected to be affected
by the request, whether granted or denied)
Staff Concerns:
City code requires a minimum spacing between a home and a swimming pool because, if not
built properly, a swimming pool built too close could negatively affect the home's foundation. In
cases such as this one, city staff will ask the pool builder or home owner to submit certification
from a qualified engineer that the pool will not impair the structural integrity of the foundation.
Staff Recommendations:
Staff recommends approval (see below).
Background and Overview:
The property is located in the Winding Creek neighborhood off Bowman Springs Rd, adjacent to the
Oak Hill Park neighborhood (see attached map). It is a cul-de-sac lot with a required 30-foot front
building setback. As shown on the attached survey/plot plan, complying with the front setback
requirement on this cul-de-sac lot leaves very little back yard. Under normal conditions, this would still
leave room for a swimming pool, albeit a small one, as city code requires swimming pools be located
eight feet from a home and eight feet from a property line. However, this lot also has a 15-foot
drainage and utility easement along the rear property line, which further restricts the pool replacement.
In fact, the additional setback established by the easement essentially eliminates any possible location
for a standard swimming pool meeting city code setback requirements.
Standards for Granting a Variance
Through city code Sec. 17-430(e)(9), the Board of Adjustment has the authority to grant variances to
the development regulations such as setbacks when the literal enforcement of the regulations would
result in an unnecessary hardship. You are also permitted to grant variances when the variance is
necessary to permit the reasonable development of a specific property that differs from other
properties in the same district by being of such area, shape or slope that it cannot be developed in a
manner commensurate with the development permitted upon other properties in the same district.
Staff Review.
Will the literal enforcement of the provisions of this article result in an unnecessary hardship?
Staff considers enforcement of the spacing requirement in this case to be an unnecessary
hardship.
Is a variance necessary to permit the reasonable development of a specific parcel of land
which differs from other parcels of land in the same district by being of such area, shape
or slope that it cannot be developed in a manner commensurate with the development
permitted upon other parcels of land in the same district?
Staff considers several questions in determining whether a variance request meets this standard:
(1) is the request owing to a special condition inherent in the property itself;
(2) is the condition unique to the property for which a variance is requested;
(3) is the condition self-created;
(4) will a strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance create hardship above that suffered by the
general public;
(5) will the hardship deprive the property owner of the right to use his property;
If we find the answers above demonstrate conditions favorable to granting a variance, we also
consider these questions:
(6) would granting the variance be contrary to the public interest; and
(7) is the request within the spirit of the ordinance and further substantial justice?
(1) Is the request owing to a special condition inherent in the property itself?
Several factors indicate the property has a special condition.
• The lot is on a cul-de-sac. In order to build a home of a size comparable to others in the same
neighborhood and zoning district, the home must extend farther into the back yard than it
would do if it were not built in a cul-de-sac. This extension restricts the possible locations in the
yard for a swimming pool and reduces the possible distance between the home and a pool.
• There is a utility and drainage easement along the rear of the property. The easement is fifteen
feet (16), whereas most utility easements in the city are seven and one half feet (7.5') (fifteen
feet is required but is usually split across two lots). This means that the property in this case
requires nearly twice the usual distance requirement between a pool and a rear property line
and requires the pool to be pushed closer to the home than would normally be necessary.
• Mr. Taiwo (one of the applicants) has examined plats of other properties with the same zoning
designation, and from his research, it appears as though many of the other properties have
larger lot sizes, which makes it easier to meet the pool setback requirements. Staff have also
looked at plats for other R-3-zoned subdivisions and have found this property to have a
condition not present on other lots.
(2) Is the condition unique to the property for which a variance is created?
Other subdivisions zoned R-3 also have cul-de-sacs, and other R-3-zoned subdivisions have same or
similar lot sizes. However, the most distinguishing feature about this in question is the 15-foot utility
and drainage easement across the back of the property. An easement of this size across one side of a
rear property line is not common and could be considered unique (if not to this lot, than at least to a
very few). For example, the adjacent neighborhood of Oak Hill Park is also zoned R-3, but the utility
easement is typically located in the front of the lots. Where a rear yard utility easement is dedicated,
this is typically eight feet in width.
• See attachments:
o Beacon Hill plat drawing. Subdivision is zoned R-3, lots are 70' wide, with depths ranging from
125' to 165' (approx.). Utility easements (u.e.) are mostly located in the front yards of the lots
rather than the back. Some lots have rear yard u.e.'s, but these are split across two lots, with
each lot having a 7.5' u.e
• Oak Hill Park plat drawing. Subdivision is zoned R-3 (except for a few lots), lots are 70'
to 80' wide, with depth typically 125' for non-cul-de-sac lots, deeper in cul-de-sacs.
U.e.'s are mostly located in the front yards of the lots rather than the back. A small
number of lots have rear yard u.e.'s, but these are 7.5' to 8' in width.
• Steeplechase Estates section 3 plat drawing. Subdivision is zoned R-3, lots are 90'
wide, with depths ranging from 117' to 125' (approx). U.e.'s are along the rear property
lines but are only 7.5' in width.
(3) Is the condition self-created?
The home was built based on a home design selected by the applicants, so on one hand, it could be
argued that the condition was self-created because the applicants chose not to build a smaller home
that could accommodate a pool. It is clear from conversations with the builder and the builder's pool
contractor, however, that neither the builder nor the home owners knew the easement along the rear
property line was fifteen feet instead of the usual seven and one-half feet.
Staff could not find Texas case law determining whether ignorance of a city requirement is sufficient to
show that a hardship is not self-created, but cases from other states have determined that in a case
such as this, not knowing about a 15-feet easement (and therefore not choosing to build a home with a
smaller footprint) would be sufficient to prove the hardship was not self-created. And in any case, it is
unusual for the city to require a 15-foot easement along one side of a property line, and this required
dedication was not created by the applicant (it was created by the developer who dedicated the
easement via plat).
Staff would support an assessment that the condition is not self-created.
(4) Will a strict enforcement of the zoning ordinance create a hardship above that suffered
by the general public?
Yes. Because this property has special conditions not shared by most lots in the same zoning district
(namely, its location on a cul-de-sac and an extra-large easement in the rear yard), strict enforcement
of the 8-foot spacing requirement would create a hardship above that suffered by the general public.
(5) Will the hardship deprive the property owner of the right to use his property?
The hardship will not deprive the property owner of the right to use the property. However, it does
deprive the property owner of the right to use the property to the full extent possible given to owners of
similarly-sized lots in the same zoning district with the same limiting conditions.
(6) Would granting the variance be contrary to the public interest?
No. Granting the variance would not injure public health, safety, or general welfare, and it would not
alter the character of the neighborhood or city. In addition, it is not expected to diminish the values of
surrounding properties.
(7) Is the request within the spirit of the ordinance and further substantial justice?
Yes. The pool setback requirements are generally intended to safeguard the structural integrity of the
associated home and to ensure easements (and access to such easements) are protected. Granting
the variance will not impair any easements, and before a permit will be issued, the applicant will be
required to submit certification from an engineer that the pool being located closer than eight feet to
the house will not damage the structural integrity of the home's foundation.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approving the requested variance.
Action by the Board of Adjustment.
The board may approve the request for a variance, deny the request, or continue (postpone) your
consideration of the request. If you continue the agenda item, your motion must state the date and
time when the request will be considered again.
Sample motions.
Sample motions are provided below for your reference. You are not required to use any of the sample
motions.
Approve
I find the request to meet the standards for a variance in that the applicant has an unnecessary
hardship and therefore make a motion to approve Case# BOA 15-01 to grant a variance from Section
17-405(d)Q) of the Kennedale city code to allow a swimming pool to be located closer than 8 feet to a
primary structure.
OR
Approve
I find the request to meet the standards for a variance in that the variance is necessary to permit the
reasonable development of the property in question in a manner commensurate with the development
permitted upon other properties in the same district and therefore make a motion to approve Case #
BOA 15-01 to grant a variance from Section 17-405(d)Q) of the Kennedale city code to allow a
swimming pool to be located closer than 8 feet to a primary structure.
OR
Deny
I find the request does not meet the standards for a variance and make a motion to deny Case # BOA
15-01.
OR
Postpone
I make a motion to continue consideration of Case BOA 15-02 until (state the date).
IV. Recommendation:
Approve
V. Alternative Actions:
VI. Attachments:
1. BOA 15-01 map BOA 15-01 site of re uest. df
2. BOA 15-01 aerial view 2 305 Autumnwood Ct Goo le Earth view
3. Winding Creek plat showing Lot 15 —Winding Creek plat drawing.pdf
4. BOA 15-01 application BOA 15-01 application u load. df
BOA 15-01 property survey BOA 15-01 survey.pdf
pool plan oolPlan. df
BOA 15-01 exterior photo BOA 15-01 photo l.jpg
Beacon Hill plat Beacon Hill Phase I plat drawing.pdf
Oak Hill Park plat 10ak Hill Park Ph II. df
10. iSteeplechase Estates plat ISteeplechase Estates Section 3. df
Illustration Showing Siteof Variance Request
BOA 15-01
p
W-7 WWI
�,t, ♦ Icy,, f. f�k. CT. +k.,.�i7„�" 'r 1,r{i .k�,a, �5`,,�
� N -
4'.
r �
r ,
w .t � E •
r
Symbols
mbols
BOA 15-01 site of request
o so
Kennedale city limits
Feet
*9,
r � y
>• r
�. - to r•�_ _ utumn `A
i 5
Ole Ig
305 IAuturti nwaod Ct
Goo c earth
1995 32°3932.09"N 97°13 26.41''LV.elev 591 ft eye alt 1818 ft ..
FILED TR,10B1
TARRAHTCOUNTY TEXAS MICHELEE DEVELOPMENT,CORK
$WIWY ADDITION I V.17014,P.94
' ..
V.388-1Q P,99,
2005JUL 14 dH 10 23 DRTCT
P.RTCT SWARit2ed "SON
COUHT f LERIi !!!
/RAYM HD{
R,SWINEY
ESTATE.
V.1749,
P.544
^� 4 DRTCT �ARLINGT13N CITY LIMIT
p9
KENNEllAL�CITY LIMIT
r g�tLt1 —
TR,IDS AMP/ ' 11-10' TESCO EASEMENT
BRUCE REVOCABLE TRUST V.¢145,A.181
V.14487,P.5.44 r i TCT
DRTCT /. S _...'E• ISIS 1=ASViNT
V,9629,F.1326
DRTCT
t 4644' S34'45'23'E
84'56,3 • 177.5fl - 8615' �9,: SET t.2'Ili
��. ..
l Posc .1!#=Tit
k9t� bc�
✓ ' N.. R 4k. � y��� B93 •saw� ��` �_ -" 3.3- 6�:`ca
SET 1/2'1R
ti `.� 'S 111111.3111a;t" s 'w Sg, 2"5E
N89 52
M:I g �� �^ LOT 33 TO X.DEDICATED. 47.9-41
z t9 R_ TO THE CITY OF KENNEDAL E
32 FOR DRAINAGE.d UTri tiiES SET 1%8`Ili
ref' I 1 �lnw -` c�n�rostx 1/2'F . r
ir. NF'F s]� r'w iii . c Nrr'sre N,
SIDE 2• . �1 p✓ 30.0•Minaw La10 Yl:
`-1 •389.30'17 W^'7C�•^_. )> At1
LP' afi6_7*4'�'7
RI 1631 1 CREEKWDOD COURT S^ 4i!
m� sraI 589`30'17 W 3P2+9d' A \\ VARIABLE WIDTH
7 "N7'11 Cn
a xn �` ° 1 DRAINAGE 6 UTILITY
—
z 75m_r Z EASEMENT `Q.
13sa §on uxe o•S 1/2'FI
e 1024 1 1 ) ) ".���RY FND 600 NAIL,
a 1
3lZ 1 2t9 I 3l3 l � d'f
I 27 I 2$ 29 394 ' kfgf
TR ULIO GAtlNA Z 8,730 IF 1 Z°o I• mDaD sF 8.761 tF e�aar 30 31 AsF+J�NT
{ , ° ..
PG.. 17168, in) xFPr's76 SF
PG.237,
--� L
DRTCT o• I . .. ..
1022 p I :'�. I eso•sua,DSa!.?
UI t ti t 0 a _ 1s0']eLL>1DSa .. 29ae9• _ __ :.
I - -i
e1760 SF 9p,0' 70 7ea1' 70A1 saw
ca
: — 12w 1 1 .250'DYD.DING L----
oti I a" m i9l� � I I I l i I 20 W 9
N � 515. ,..�
W § S02S g a rr s7r� 1 IF
26 25 ,�q 24 'I` 23 22 �1
�' Me� I§ e�V l RM SF
no, LINE
t I•r
1023 'a e1.9v� rIy 'T�Dau _7o^m=, 7om
m ^/ 66.9'4- TO BE AB ED.BY THIS _
1
6 �i AUTUMNWOOD COURT I.
'q• 9,73i 8F ',+g'I _ _ LATF AFTERY=MR 6
t N U S89.3017'SJ^502.23' 5 NITAR ER N dy
b�:z7•i'i^ 1 °. 2sos•'1"r 700• - ion in
`iJ2`FIR I ��ti — VE; .7 —I__aria��
12 oaAROOM U#1;0 4- 1 i 7
e92e SF /
�
_ .
TR.IC _ 31Z re, x913 .1l111>u 213 311 - 304 •11iIA 20Z •J1 .' $ 9AA,iF
JULIO CaFiONq s, a 1912 - Zj `dl . IQ •Ig la 12 13 •I '1 i5 I 1 P 5B0 si
VOL,17169, e $ 8751 SF fl S I 1 B 75e Sr
PG.237, ''Z 0,70E Sr •- i f .&750 SF l 5,730 Sr 1 8,750 sr I ed50;v l 9,750.4-. 1 Ii'm sr fe'r Sea
DRTCT I��/ - F--�.I U
l3" 5WG use 1 ) t.. �exv 1 1 I euanwo Lu z
1-
1�39'T 7A r 7eo'., _ 7i - -_70A• 70A' �D.O•t .96.19' f266]�-. 00.71•-
..
5/8'FIR S89'30117'W " 86732 'IS'DRAINAGE d UTD_LTY EASEMENT = a
TR,2A 1$.7
KENNEDALE ISD , DAL .
KENNEDgLE ISO -
11OTES: .Maintenance_Statement for Natural Channel de Detention Are
1.,Tne City of Kennedale will not he reeponsIble far,or maintenance The City of Kehnedole Is not responelblo for the design, construction
of Any non-drainage rotated imp2rr�4}vemeents within the drainage operation, nmalntenance or use a the nnature) chahne), swole, or
easement,Including but not Ilmitsd to paving and fenoos. detention area loceted In Lot 33, 8)ock I Kind their associated drainagei
2.Building line shall be In accordance with City Ord'inance, easements, herein referred'to ae "features' to be developed
and
oonstructed by developer or his successors. Developer will indemnify,
3.This property moy be subject to charges related to impact fees and the defend and hold harmless the City. of Kennedole, its officers, employees,
applicant should contact the City regarding applicable fees due. and agents from any direct or Indirect loss, damage, liability,"or
4.All property carriers marked with 1/2"Capped Iron Rods except as noted expense and ottomey s fees for any negligence whatsoever, orWing
5.The C t of Kennedae reserves the ht to requite minimum finish floor out of the desiggn__; oanstruptioh,-operation, maintenance, condition or
Y fill use of the 'foal , Including any non-performance of the,foregoing.
elevations on any lot contained in this addition. Developer will regwire any auaoessor In Interest to accept full Teponeibility
•6,No buildings,fences,or other structures/improvements are allowed to.be placed. and liability for, the "features".All of the above shall be covenante
within an Erosion Clear Zeno running with the land. It is expressly contemplated that developer shall
7,This property is zoned R-3. impose these covenants upon Lot 33, Bleak t, the full obligaticn and
11.No construction of habitable structures or Improvements reW, lctng or Impeding responsibiflty of maintaining and operating scid feature",
the free flow of storm water will be allowed within the 100 year flood easement.
No fill,excavation,or alteration of existing surface allowed without appropriate
permit ideued by the City of Kennedale.
I, John )S- Zimmerman, .a Registered Professional Land Surveys
Certify that the foregoing plat was complied from a survey ma
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of The City Council of the is Keday of Texas + ..... grounds under my supervision and is correct and that there"ari
Ke- dale,Texa"s..vated•a trmatively cn this voted affi dtiyely on this .day of 'pfNN- protrusions, easements, conflicts, oVeriaps or encroachments c
cloy of irf 2005. L 2005. .'' "'`4-0 shown, and that I have been advised.
t rove this al Plot[ to app ove this P T fijin9 af" cord. -G
Cho) Planing and Zoning Commission or,City of Ken edale �'•, 7`6s/75
Regi Bred Pro. )onai Land Surveyor
A esb Siecretaq&Planning and'Zoning-Commission - 'Attestf City SIrcretal - - ,,,,,,,,ur+ Registration Number 2490
�r
KENNED) LE
Development Services
www.cityofkennedale.com
CITY OF KENNEDALE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
APPLICANT AND OWNER INFORMATION
SECTION 1. APPLICANT.
Name Anthony A Taiwo, Wilma Rivera
Work Phone 682-309-5201 OR Home 682-309-5201
Please provide a phone number where we can reach you during regular business hours.
Mailing Address
305 Autumnwood Ct
Kennedale, Tx 76060
SECTION 2. OWNER.
If the owner is the applicant, write "same as applicant"below and leave the rest of this section blank.
Name Same as Applicant
Work Phone Home
Mailing Address
SECTION 3. PROPERTY INFORMATION.
Property Location (Number and Street)
305 Autumnwood Ct, Kennedale Tx 76060
405 Municipal Drive, Kennedale, TX 76060 1 Telephone: 817-985-2130 1 Fax: 817-483-0182
)c
KENNEDALE
Development Services
www.cityofkennedale.com
Legal Description (Lot, Block, and Subdivision/Addition)
Lot 15, Block 1, Winding Creek Addition
Note: Attach a metes and bounds description if the property is not platted.
VARIANCE REQUEST
Zoning District Unknown
City Code reference for requirements that creates need for variance
Looking to build closer than 8ft from foundation to waters edge.
Describe City Code Requirement Cannot build anything within 8ft from foundation to waters edge.
Describe variance requested - Looking to put small in-ground pool closer to foundation than normally
allowed in Kennedale.
What hardship has been created? For the hardship in this case it would be that the 15' drainage
utility easement prevents us from installing a pool without encroaching the 8' set back required by
the city. The set back requirement is 8' from foundation to waters edge of the swimming pool. The
attached pool plan shows an allowable space that would not interfere with the drainage easement. The
pool would be engineered by a structural engineer due to the fact it would need to be built within 2' of
the foundation.
I
405 Municipal Drive, Kennedale, TX 76060 1 Telephone: 817-985-2130 1 Fax: 817-483-0182
)c
KENNEDALE
Development Services
www.ciryofkennedale.com
In review of some zoned R-3 residential properties in the city of Kennedale I have found as follows in
comparison to the Winding Creek Addition:
Steeplechase Addition
Plat - Instrument#D205182513
Much larger lots with a 10' utility easement at rear.
Beacon Hill Addition
Plat - Instrument#D205320046
Similar size lots with majority case utility easement in front yard.
Oak Hill Park Addition
Plat - Instrument #D206187295
Most lots are larger, utility easements in most case front and side.
Hillside Addition
Plat - Instrument #D184028105
Much larger lots.
This is what I'm finding zoned R-3 residential properties throughout Kennedale that are in comparison to
✓ lot. I would ask that the variance be granted in the hardship that would not otherwise be on a typical R-3
ned property in Kennedale
What created the hardship? 15 ' drainage utility easement prevents us from
installing a pool without encroaching the 8 ' set back required by the city. The set
back requirement is 8 ' from foundation to waters edge of the swimming pool.
I declare that the above is true and correct.
S
Si nature 0 Applicant Date
405 Municipal Drive, Kennedale, TX 76060 1 Telephone: 817-985-2130 1 Fax: 817-483-0182
JC
KENNEDALE
Development Services
www.cityofkennedale.com
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Indicate any potential injurious affect on the public health, safety, or welfare.
Indicate any potential tendency to defeat the intent and philosophy of the zoning ordinance.
Comments:
Recommendation Approval Disapproval
If disapproval is recommended, give reason:
(Planner or Zoning Administrator) Date
405 Municipal Drive, Kennedale, TX 76060 1 Telephone: 817-985-2130 1 Fax: 817-483-0182
305 Autumnwood Court
1
(50'ROW)
AUTUMNWOOD COURT �i�
•-*, p n p3 O l j,.7 p. e / APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
lY Q7 S/ 100—YEAR FL000 PLAIN AS
• SCALEO PER FEMA MAP.
°
N 89*30'17" 36.59'
0'17" E N 89'30'17" E
0 70.00' 70.00' ,R=50.00'
F. R. F.I.R. S.I.R. FND X" . ' 1
C.M. C.M. ; C.M. L=47.45
10, UTI Lot 15
1 Block I
30' BLDG. LINE 41 •� SET
1
au'
to 0 11.8'
11.9' 1 �
— x xW —Concrete'1 o®•`��'
SCALE L6 Drive Id `
1"=20'
CA m '4.9' 1 N
3.0 o I
to
ac ° 5.8' Brick ^"
Lot 14 i�) W W
^a z
RESIDENCE
0 305 Autumnwood 1 In Lot 16
0
o Court m 1 N
o N � �lo
0
58 0 0 24.1'
25' BLDG. UNE x h x f—TV 0.7'
} 19.7.
•
ea
.4 104.4'15' DRNG. ESM'T BLDG. LINE
104.2'
"R. F. • Qc DRNG. ESM'T
106.9' 1 1 05,6 105.2' S.I.R. IL
S as300 w
oo'
70. S 89°30'17" W 75.19'
Kennedale I.S.D.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 15,Block I of Winding Creek Addition,an addition to the City of Kennedate,Tarrant County,Texas,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A,Pg.10344,Plat Records of Tarrant County,Texas.
Date: 04103115 LEGEND-CAI—Controlling Monument;F.I.R=Found Iran Rod;FJ.P=Found Iron Pipe;
The undersigned havArs,received and F.C.P=Fence Comer Post.OHE�verhead Electric. S.I.P=Set Iron Rods 12"diameter with
reviewed a copy of this survey. ASC No. 150416 yellow cap stamped"Arthur Surveying Company".All found iron rods are 12"diameter unless
otherwise noted.—x—(fence/CE post)—OHE— (overhead power)
Drawn/Chk L.G. /F.H.W.
x FLOOD NOTE:It is my opinion that the property described herean is partially within the
Client Summit Custom Homes 100-year Road zone arcs according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood
Insurance Rate Map Community-Panel No.480603 0340 K,present Effective Date of map
September 25,2009,herein prapeny situated within Zone"X"(Unshaded),Zone"AE".
x SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION:
The undersigned does hereby certify that this survey was
this day made on the ground ofthe prapeny legally ,`� OF
described hereon and is cortcct,and to the best ofmy P,•••�ST
Date: knowledge,there ate no visible discrepancies,eomlicts, •!LG eRF•;�y
shortages in area,boundary line conflicts,encmachmen LJ:Q' •,lP
over lapping ofimprovements,easementsord tsof% !�`1
...:................. ...
that l have been advised af—.pl as shown he—,,. F.H. WESTPHALL
The bearings shown hereon arc based on the above ...................... ...
r' referenced recorded map or plat unless otherwise note 58.3
1375 Gilman Road _ __ Arthur Surveying Col `'9'O'OfSS\�� O�
do......p..``
Fort North,Texas 76140 _ SUI:V
Ph is 17)561-7949
Professional Land Surveyors
305 Autumnwood Court 220 Elm St.,#200-Lewisville,TX 75057
Kennedale,Texas
Ph.972221.9439-TFRN#10063800
anharsary eying.eom Es a alished 1986
dd
r
U 0 U N
Co % (l) z
ro
m (' W
O =
—
E L U m `o o N m O E E s is �' Q a ° .� Q E E E 3 E IE -° coo m N
a W a o N ° ca C3�' ° o rn 0 1 m J >, o w a N = ° 0 0 0� H U U U M
a O F U 0 w ii a U � U = a F U ii y (n a ❑ z m W ° o
E o n r
N a 3 N `o N
o E o Or
a s ° -o - w Q o L
LO Lo
O N 3 Q N N Q L W L Q N
�i °O Z N Ul Z N O C O N
n N (n d d N LL LL Z Q M N d W N
Q
a
LU r m° r . . o U c U Y v °' m d z W FD U) LL LL U b z
H U Q >. o 0 o m o W 0 2 °- o
_ o m a m m o
O N d °o X ° aE aE aE a° aE H N J = J T o m T O Q a Q U U Q U U
IL in U d w o � tr Ir cr � En — a E o O o w W C9 w U 1 m
0
u
0
6i c °� ondeda
J
U
w
N'.
7
w'S
G1
c
D
in
191
r. N:
1
a O - W
U
a` o Z
r w W
° w ❑
a w _
a O
U)
U
0 w
F
U)
X
w
Li
co
Zw�r
�1
1�=5-r' _
h
.�...
1�:�8 j
.. : 1 '.0
�' �� L
t � .. � ,;; .., ,
a' r �
o M � � SFr
�� ..
�_
y
r�
WOO
1-5511
4::
40,
mv,
MN Vo
WSL l
OF"
PE
kscom..'
A4
ow-V AAS omrwr 11 ZIP
041
lap
IIE
2ji4b
Jw
4p
V
HINK
Hlw
WD
A4 NNW*7ni
Li
.rr,
\N1 �'� / � j � �� I C� � I � � � � �� '
Iwo OWL
Tou"
ow 4QW013"M
OvOrm:05NOZ
Ali
LOT StlAlrllFfl' ., tr aar a+rr a< FkWCpyF, rtr�s rnn tta anerw n+ur r rwa n
13e uor er ur xs +•"�"
assx 3
+, iao m w.wr.r{F'�f'�+ aq• ?m .� �ai"c�arr[�rc.vraaxr. rr ca .,.a'
v
Aar ra Ir.aar r•c,e e_ v. T� *{�IA}.,� . :F.ri..i.ano a0..r mrassar. wr
�„ ryprr r-ta _A"!LSiar C["�E£ 'e%ti.A- ...f.• ( � - �
i, �.rF ryyf q^�.ewe ep'D itW.ti
ti � �� sPV ef9r"i"t
PJDWMWUM AkVMi'xLT or BEGWNNG
tar x! fffli arm
OIr `` nassn rauama
lar L ;]ar 1 t 3 1 S �rS a I !w P 1 7
rrn
tar H Roar 6 °y,
lOr to 47ar __ _ J. t
ors Amp --
rw as a,raa _� _ .xR s.n _xc• - -sv`---xu_J r
EASEAlfN►LEGEND --ap _
aladr a
or uterr Fawaresr J► 1�..:i+�r r a y ....�... M r sro xr ...sr. s ° r rr e
�r xaw•,w.r scr.cv ctsr,n.r f ���- '�--�. �`'.R. ��..y— -i, 4 ,
lcsac rsf!r ae. ow.rr usrrr.. ,�.,,
0 f t i� w�ata`• A � t 1'�tT t�fJ 9 SX P � � W M a �wi i
w`or r3 IAaei
1. rwaar USE tAOLf § �^+• r a� �.� ,,. tM $ Y .1 ru�c a` K 5 wu a:+
�7 i% X9 bE+MrK a# •..r g i of
war lr mi .s re.rr, rP +c5'I� SVinf$#` n• n
a K
AjN
r r' b,�21�w�,rrr •`; ` , .. alaao' w q�r
Ajm oar ei rov �`ii AMC K .. a
oar o roar _ °' °' a.•. ."Pr Roar
IOrA PaS ,r F! r rr k lo
lar Jr a,uP 1 1 LL
W Jr r4 oar ,t
mr,v v.±m - .'a a ". rrra►FIFP Y 'r1 M - $
oar.0 2%w _
oar 35 ra r "".�J1 d/l• n°...i°�. r 1y� i' u - ,
OF x ee s an _ r.ar ■ oar 'u 1T f 7
tar: ana rffl E - -a7 _ _we'.-a p
oar� a,PY .. M Yr .w ww.w Y wr �� • � �If rt
tar,4r !.l3r
r-an x
ia+.`tr ran _ as
r 1 o
m 311su x n
to-$r I,a.Olr
wr u R„ er. toG° rJ6 r a
tar.fro amp 4d.�. �dg s rP ! !•\ r7
eff
orm
Aar u :Arm
,., v r fi S •dr• I/ a3'avr -
A,
iwN Pr .
EF aatta ar
i$ ,� jw
aM irPe `.
im w ti
«m tAro, o- sbr.r j .rr #.` ^`` "cPSe !'iZ
aw
a 'Y rrR
won xr•Ir./
na. ,>•?. Ni rr �' �L.' aR•P ar ,• h r - f ara. e n
� .,
AM
w.. e rd..�s u.,.,s:.•rrrr7w �ti�� y '� r rr�wrr�9 l�4 Pr ` ar ~ ! r !7 r°
r
iax. JL I
,p9.11A0 5 A
r 8101-1+ 9 LL
Im
DoV
-----------
41
iv
Will
21
Nil
IV sag -ii
j4l
1 g 4j
LIM'
JI
fit ;q
31
ZO!
8j
CIVIL
V9
— � — I �. ! �{'f Pow-�e.e.a°."
VI a
2p 6
1121fig,
Ill lZilpi tiff
11 U — 'I �1. .1 �111 Oivx
91
I'll',wigs; Islilml