O3712007 KENNEDALE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. 371
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II, ROADWAY IMPACT FEES, OF
CHAPTER 20, STREETS AND SIDEWALKS, OF THE KENNEDALE CITY
CODE (1992), AS AMENDED, BY REVISING ROADWAY IMPACT FEES
ON NEW LAND DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY
LIMITS OF THE CITY OF KENNEDALE, TEXAS; UPDATING LAND USE
ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS; PROVIDING
FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF IMPACT FEES;
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL
ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Kennedale currently provides public roadway facilities that
serve land within its City limits; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed
minimum levels of service by utilizing funds
improvements programming processes and
therein; and
to providing public roadway facilities and
allocated in the capital budget and capital
relying upon the funding sources indicated
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that new residential and nonresidential
development causes and imposes increased and excessive demands upon City facilities
and services, including roadway facilities that would not otherwise occur; and
WHEREAS, planning and zoning projections indicate that such development will
continue and will place ever-increasing demands on the City to provide necessary public
facilities; and
WHEREAS, to the extent that such new development places demands upon the
public facility infrastructure, the City Council has determined that those demands should
be satisfied by shifting the responsibility for financing the provision of such facilities from
the public at large to the developments actually creating the demands for them; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with state law, the City Council has previously adopted
impact fees to finance new development demands for roadway facilities; and
WHEREAS, the amount of the impact fees to be imposed is determined by the
projections set forth in Land Use Assumptions and the cost of the additional public facilities
needed to support such development, which public facilities are identified in Capital
Improvement Plans; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the notice, adoption, promulgation and
methodology required by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, the Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee and the City Council have reviewed the Land Use
W:\Kennedale\ORDINANC\Impact Fees.2007 Update-roadway.wpd (06/29/07) Page 1
Assumptions and Capital Improvement Plans previously adopted and have determined that
the these documents and the previously adopted impact fees should be updated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to update and amend the previously
adopted Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans and the roadway impact fees
in accordance with state law.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
KENNEDALE,TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
Exhibit B, "Land Use Assumptions," Exhibit C, "Schedule of Assessed and Collected
Impact Fees," and Exhibit D, "Roadway Improvement Plan" attached hereto are hereby
adopted and shall replace Exhibits B, C, and D, attached to Ordinance No. 235 adopted
May 9, 2002, codified in Article II, Chapter 20 of the Kennedale City Code.
SECTION 2.
Sections 20-28, 20-30, 20-31, 20-32, 20-33, 20-52, and 20-53 of the Kennedale City
Code are hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 20-28. Land use assumptions.
Land use assumptions used in the development of roadway impact fees are hereby
adopted as shown in Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 371. These assumptions may be revised
by the city council according to the procedures set forth in V.T.C.A., Local Government
Code ch. 395.
Sec. 20-30. Service units.
(a) Service units are established in accordance with generally accepted
engineering and planning standards.
(b) Service units utilized for calculation of roadway impact fees shall be as set
forth in Exhibit C attached to Ordinance No. 371.
(c) The city council may revise the calculation of service units according to the
procedures set forth in V.T.C.A., Local Government Code ch. 395.
Sec. 20-31. Impact fees per service unit.
(a) The assessed impact fee per service unit is computed by subtracting fifty (50)
percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvement plans from the
capital construction cost in the capital improvement plans for that category of capital
improvements, and dividing that amount by the total number of projected service units
anticipated within the service area which are necessitated by and attributable to new
development, based on the land use assumptions for that service area. The assessed
roadway impact fees per service unit are set forth in Exhibit C, attached to Ordinance No.
371.
W:\Kennedale\ORDINANC\Impact Fees.2007 Update-roadway.wpd (06/29/07) Page 2
(b) The assessed impact fees in Exhibit C attached to Ordinance No. 371 may
be amended by the City Council according to the procedures set forth in V.T.C.A., Local
Government Code ch. 395.
Sec. 20-32. Assessment of impact fees.
(a) The approval of any subdivision of land for any new development shall
include as a condition the assessment of the impact fees applicable to such development.
(b) Impact fees for any new development shall be based upon the impact fee per
service unit set forth in the Schedule of Assessed and Collected Impact Fees in effect at
the time of assessment, and shall be assessed as follows:
(1) For a new development which was final platted pursuant to the city's
subdivision regulations before adoption of Ordinance No. 235 on May 9,
2002, assessment shall be the maximum impact fee adopted in Ordinance
No. 235.
(2) For a new developmentwhich has received final plat approval pursuant to the
city's subdivision regulations after the adoption of Ordinance No. 235 on May
9, 2002, assessment shall be the maximum impact fee in effect on the date
of final plat recordation.
(c) Following assessment of the impact fees pursuant to subsection (b) of this
section, no additional impact fees or increases thereof shall be assessed against that
development unless the number of service units increases.
(d) Following the lapse or expiration of approval for a plat, a new assessment
must be performed at the time a new plat for such development is filed.
Sec. 20-33. Calculation of impact fees.
(a) Following a request fora building permit or tap purchase for new
development, the city manager shall compute impact fees due for the new development in
the following manner:
(1) The number of service units shall be determined as set forth in Exhibit C,
attached to Ordinance No. 371; and
(2) The total service units shall be multiplied by the appropriate per-unit fee
amount determined as set forth in section 20-31.
(b) The total amount of each impact fee due for a new development shall not
exceed the amounts shown in Exhibit C attached to Ordinance No. 371.
(c) Separate impact fees shall be calculated forwater, wastewater, and roadway
facilities.
W:\Kennedale\ORDINANC\Impact Fees.2007 Update-roadway.wpd (06/29/07) Page 3
Sec. 20-52. Roadway improvement plan.
(a) The roadway improvement plan for the city is hereby adopted as Exhibit D
attached to Ordinance No. 371.
(b) The roadway improvement plan may be amended from time to time, pursuant
to the procedures set forth in V.T.C.A., Local Government Code ch. 395 and its
successors.
Sec. 20-53. Roadway impact fees.
(a) The maximum impact fee values per service unit for roadway facilities are
hereby adopted and incorporated in Exhibit C attached to Ordinance No. 371.
(b) The maximum impact fee values per service unit for roadway facilities may
be amended from time to time, pursuant to the procedures in section 20-30.
SECTION 2.
CUMULATIVE CLAUSE
This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of
Kennedale, Texas, except where the provisions of this Ordinance are indirect conflict with
the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such
ordinances are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 1, as amended by Ordinance Nos. 138
and 159, shall remain applicable to the assessment and collection of impact fees on
properties that are not subject to the assessment and collection of impact fees under this
Ordinance.
SECTION 3.
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses,
sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase,
clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional
by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such
unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,
paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by
the City Council without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional
phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
SECTION 4.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is
so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED ON this the 12th day of July, 2007.
W:\Kennedale\ORDINANC\Impact Fees.2007 Update-roadway.wpd (06/29/07) Page 4
`I\II~II II II IIIf111/~.;
~
.:~ OF KENN
~.
~
.
,.
C
=
•. ~ =T
t°
~ .
•*~
-a :
ATT~
~. #
~a
• ~' ::
,~
..
.
Kathy Turned City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
~t1~LQ~_
Wayne K. Olson, City Attorney
ayor, Bryan Lankhorst
W:\Kennedale\ORDINANC\Impact Fees.2007 Update-roadway.wpd (06/29/07) Page 5
EXHIBIT B
LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS
POPULATION AND LAND USE PROJECTIONS FOR THE CITY OF KENNEDALE
LAND USE 2007
ACRES % 2017
ACRES % Full Buildout
ACRES
Single-Family Residential (Low
Density) 1,368 31.87% 1,982 46.18% 1,982 46.18%
Multi-Family Residential (High
Density) 4 0.09% 5 0.12% 5 0.12%
Other Residential (Moderate Density) 64 1.49% 93 2.17% 93 2.17%
Industrial 567 13.21% 821 19.13% 821 19.13%
Commercial 199 4.64% 288 6.71 % 288 6.71
Institutional 67 1.56% 97 2.26% 97 2.26%
Infrastructure 543 12.65% 786 18.31 % 786 18.31
Parks and Floodplains 102 2.38% 148 3.45% 148 3.45%
Water 24 0.56% 35 0.82% 35 0.82%
Under Construction 25 0.58% 36 0.84% 36 0.84%
Vacant 1, 330 30.99% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
TOTAL ACREAGE 4,292 100.00% 4,292 100.00% 4,292 100.00%
Population 6,776 9,819 9,819
Population per Total Acre 1.58 2.29 2.29
Source: City of Kennedale, Texas Comprehensive Land Use Plan (February 9, 2006).
EXHIBIT C
SCHEDULE OF ASSESSED AND COLLECTED IMPACT FEES
The assessed roadway impact fee per LUE is $1,336.33.
The actual amount of impact fee to be collected per LUE is $1,336.33.
MAXIMUM ROADWAY IMPACT FEES FOR VARIOUS LAND USES
LAND USE UNIT LUE
EQUIVALENCY MAXIMUM
IMPACT FEE
PER UNIT
Low Densit Residential Dwellin Unit 1.00 1 336.33
Medium Densit Residential Dwellin Unit 1.00 1 336.33
Hi h Densit Residential Dwellin Unit 0.61 820.32
Commercial /Retail 1000 S . Ft. 2.07 2 771.10
Office 1000 S . Ft. 1.48 $1 971.42
Industrial 1000 S . Ft. 0.97 $1 296.64
Schools Student 0.11 148.19
EXHIBIT D
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
CAPACITY DEMAND FOR EACH NEW LUE
UTILITY /FACILITY BASIS CAPACITY PER LUE
ROADWAYS
Low-Density Residential ITE, 6`h Edition 3.03 Vehicle-Miles per dwelling unit
Medium-Density Residential ITE, 6`h Edition 3.03 Vehicle-Miles per dwelling unit
High-Density Residential ITE, 6th Edition 1.86 Vehicle-Miles per dwelling unit
Commercial /Retail ITE, 6th Edition 6.28 Vehicle-Miles per 1,000 Sq. Ft.
Office ITE, 6`h Edition 4.47 Vehicle-Miles per 1,000 Sq. Ft.
Industrial ITE, 6`h Edition 2.94 Vehicle-Miles per 1,000 Sq. Ft.
Schools ITE, 6th Edition 0.34 Vehicle-Miles er student
SOURCE: Lee Engineering, 2007.
ROADWAY LUE EQUIVALENCIES FOR VARIOUS LAND USES
LAND USE
UNIT PM PEAK
TRIPS /
UNIT TRIP
LENGTH
(Miles) VEHICLE-
MILES /
UNIT LUE
EQUIVALENCY
Low Densit Residential Dwellin 1.01 3.0 3.03 1.00
Medium Densit Dwellin 1.01 3.0 3.03 1.00
Hi h Densit Residential Dwellin 0.62 3.0 1.86 0.61
Commercial /Retail 1000 S 3.74 2.4 6.28 2.07
Office 1000 S 1.49 3.0 4.47 1.48
Industrial 1000 S 0.98 3.0 2.94 0.97
Schools Student 0.16 2.1 0.34 0.11
Source: Lee Engineering, 2007.
ESTIMATED SERVICE DEMAND AND LUE'S FOR VARIOUS LAND USES
ROADWAYS
LAND USE
2007 DEMAND
2017
ULTIMATE
LOW /MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
Dwelling Units 2,574 3,736 3,736
Vehicle-Miles /Dwelling Unit 3.03 3.03 3.03
Vehicle-Miles of Demand 7,799 11,320 11,320
Vehicle-Miles per LUE 3.03 3.03 3.03
Subtotal LUE's 2,574 3,736 3,736
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
Dwelling Units 32 40 40
Vehicle-Miles /Dwelling Unit 1.86 1.86 1.86
Vehicle-Miles of Demand 60 74 74
Vehicle-Miles per LUE 3.03 3.03 3.03
Subtotal LUE's 20 25 25
COMMERCIAL /RETAIL
1000 sq. ft. 811 1,174 1,174
Vehicle-Miles / 1000 sq. ft. 6.28 6.28 6.28
Vehicle-Miles of Demand 5,093 7,373 7,373
Vehicle-Miles per LUE 3.03 3.03 3.03
Subtofa/ LUE`s 1,681 2,433 2,433
OFFICE
1000 sq. ft. 348 503 503
Vehicle-Miles / 1000 sq. ft. 4.47 4.47 4.47
Vehicle-Miles of Demand 1,556 2,248 2,248
Vehicle-Miles per LUE 3.03 3.03 3.03
Subtotal LUE's 513 742 742
INDUSTRIAL
1000 sq. ft. 1,235 1,788 1,788
Vehicle-Miles / 1000 sq. ft. 2.94 2.94 2.94
Vehicle-Miles of Demand 3,631 5,257 5,257
Vehicle-Miles per LUE 3.03 3.03 3.03
Subtofa) LUE's 1,198 1, 735 i, 735
TOTALS
Vehicle-Miles of Demand 18,138 26,272 26,272
LUES 5,986 8,671 8,671
Source: Lee Engineering, 2007.
ROADWAY CIP INVENTORY AND COSTING
TOTAL FACILITY CAPACITY 2007-2017
FACILITY CONSTRUCT
COST
CURRENT
2007-2017
POST-2017
CAPITAL
COST PER
TYPE NAME TOTAL COST. GROWTH GROWTH COST
TOTAL LUE
BOWMAN SPRINGS ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-Lane Undivided IH2O Frontage Rd. to
Bus. US287 $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 $0 $0.
FUTURE FACILITIES
Realign and build 4 lanes City Limit to
Bus US287 $2,353,150
Subtotal Future Facilities $2,353150 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00'x° $728 547
TOTAL BOWMAN SPR/NGS ROAD $2,353,150 $728,547 $271.39
BUSINESS US287
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-lane Undivided $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.
FUTURE FACILITIES
Subtotal Future Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.0
TOTAL BUSINESS US287 $0 $0 $0.
DICK PRICE ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-Lane Undivided Bus US287 to City
Limit $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.0
FUTURE FACILITIES
Realign and build 4 lanes Bus US287 to
SP RR $1,800,000
Build 2 lanes SP RR to Cit Limit $3,500,000
Subtotal Future Facilities $5 300 000 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $1 640908 $611.2
TOTAL DICK PRICE ROAD $5,300,000 $1,640,908 $611.2
EDEN ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-Lane Undivided Mansfield Cardinal to
Cit Limit $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.0
FUTURE FACILITIES
Subtotal Future Facilities $0 100.00% B9.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.0
TOTAL EDEN ROAD $0 $0 $0.0
ROADWAY CIP INVENTORY AND COSTING
TOTAL FACILITY CAPACITY 2007-2017
FACILITY CONSTRUCT
COST
CURRENT
2007-2017
POST-2017
CAPITAL
COST PER
TYPE NAME TOTAL COST. GROWTH GROWTH COST
TOTAL LUE
HUDSON VILLAGE CREEK ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-Lane Undivided Kennedale New Hope
to Eden Rd S $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.
FUTURE FACILITIES
Subtotal Future Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.
TOTAL HUDSON VILLAGE CREEK RD. $0 $0 $0.
JOPLIN ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-Lane Undivided JR Hawkins to Swiney
Hiett $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.0
FUTURE FACILITIES
Subtotal Future Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.
TOTAL JOPLIN ROAD $0 $0 $p.
KENNEDALE NEW HOPE ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-Lane Undivided Bus US287 to
Hudson Villa a Creek $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96°~ 0.00% $0 $0.
FUTURE FACILITIES
Build 2 lanes Bus US287 to SP RR $750,000
Build 2 lanes SP RR to Hudson Villa a $3,750,000
Subtotal Future Facilities $4,500,000 100.00% 69.04% 30.90% 0.00% $1,393,223 $518.9
TOTAL KENNEDALE NEW HOPE ROAD $4,500,000 $1,393,223 $518.99
KENNEDALE SUBLETT ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-Lane Undivided Bus US287 to
Kennedale-Little School $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
2-Lane Undivided Kennedale-Little
School to Jo lin $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.0
FUTURE FACILITIES
Realign and build 4 lanes Bus US287 to
Kennedale-Little $3,600,000
Build 2 lanes Kennedale-Little to City
Limits $1,849,922
Subtotal Future Facilities $5449 922 100.00% 09.04% 30.90% 0.00% $1087324 $028.54
TOTAL KENNEDALE SUBLETT ROAD $5,449,922 $1,087,324 $028.54
ROADWAY CIP INVENTORY AND COSTING
TOTAL FACILITY CAPACITY 2007-2017
FACILITY CONSTRUCT
COST
CURRENT
2007-2017
POST-2017
CAPITAL
COST PER
TYPE NAME TOTAL CUST. GROWTH GROWTH COST
TOTAL LUE
KENNEDALE LITTLE SCHOOL ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
4-Lane Undivided IH2O to Penns Ivania $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
2-Lane Undivided Pennsylvania to
Mansfield Cardinal $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04°~ 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.
FUTURE FACILITIES
Build new lanes S of Pennsylvania Ave
to Bus US287 $2,362,050
Build new 4 lane roadway Bus US287 to
Kennedale New Ho a Rd. $3,D00,000
Subtotal Future Facilities $5 362 050 100.00% 69.04% 30.98% 0.00% $1 860119 $618.41
TOTAL KENN. LITTLE SCHOOL RD $5,36$050 $1,660,119 $618.41
KENNEDALE-SUBLETT RD AT KENNEDALE-LITTLE SCHOOL RD ROAD
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
$0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 $0 $0.
FUTURE FACILITIES
Install traffic signal Kennedale -Sublett
at Kennedale-Little School $150,000
Subtotal Future Facilities $150 000 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $46441 $17.3
TOTAL KENNEDALE-SUBLETT ROAD $150,000 $46,441 $17.3
ROADWAY CIP INVENTORY AND COSTING
TOTAL FACILITY CAPACITY 2007-2017
FACILITY CONSTRUCT
COST
CURRENT
2007-2017
POST-2017
CAPITAL
COST PER
TYPE NAME TOTAL CUST. GROWTH GROWTH COST
TOTAL LUE
TREEPOINT DRIVE
EXISTING FACILITIES Percent
2-Lane Undivided City Limt to
Kennedale-Little School $0
4-Lane Undivided Median Way to
Vandalia Trail $0
2-Lane Undivided Vandalia Trail to
Kennedale Sublett $0
Subtotal Existing Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00°k $0 $0.
FUTURE FACILITIES
Subtotal Future Facilities $0 100.00% 69.04% 30.96% 0.00% $0 $0.
TOTAL TREEPOINT DRIVE $0 $0 $0.
ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL $23,115,122 $7,15ti,5ti2 $2,665.8
The future facilities in this CIP are representative roads. The City may construct alternative projects to accommodate new growth, which will provide the
same vehicle miles of capacity for new growth.
DERIVATION OF MAXIMUM ROADWAY CAPITAL RECOVERY COSTS
THROUGH 50% REDUCTION OF FEE
ITEM
CONSTRUCTION
COSTS
LESS
50% OF
CONSTRUCTION
COSTS EQUALS
MAXIMUM
IMPACT
FEE PER
LUE
Bowman S rin s Road $271.39 $135.69 $135.69
US Bus 287 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Dick Price Road $611.25 $305.63 $305.63
Eden Road $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Hudson Villa a Creek Road $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Jo lin Road $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Kennedale New Ho a Road $518.99 $259.49 $259.49
Kennedale Sublett Road $628.54 $314.27 $314.27
Kennedale Little School Road $618.41 $309.20 $309.20
Kennedale-Sublett Rd at Kennedale-Little $17.30 $8.65 $8.65
Tree oint Drive $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
CIP/Stud Costs $6.78 $3.39 $3.39
The future facildies in this CIP are representative roads. The City may construct alternative projects to accommodate new growth, which will
provide the same vehicle-miles of capacity for new growth.